Cited by 13Turfgrass Adaptation and ManagementSoil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsPlant Micronutrient Interactions and Effects

Seasonal dynamics of soil micronutrients in compost-amended bermudagrass turf

Provin, Tony L., Wright, Alan L., Hons, Frank M., Zuberer, David A., White, Richard H.·2008·Bioresource Technology

Abstract

Compost application to turfgrasses can increase plant-available nutrient concentrations in soil and improve growth, but may alter micronutrient dynamics and increase leaching and runoff losses. The objectives of this study were to investigate the influence of compost on the seasonal dynamics of plant-available Mn, Fe, Cu, and Zn in soil after a single application to bermudagrass [Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers.] turf. Extractable Mn increased from 270 to 670 mg kg(-1) and Cu from 0.36 to 9.89 mg kg(-1) from 0 to 29 months. In contrast, extractable Fe and Zn decreased by 52% and 57% during the same time period. Seasonal trends in extractable Mn and Cu were closely related to dissolved organic C (DOC), and appeared influenced by bermudagrass growth and dormancy patterns and subsequent impacts on DOC. Losses of Mn and Cu from the soil surface occurred after high levels of precipitation during winter dormancy but not during the growing season, while Fe and Zn exhibited an opposite pattern. Thus, seasonal variation of soil micronutrients was likely related to seasonal patterns of bermudagrass growth and dormancy and their effects on DOC, and precipitation events which probably leached DOC and complexed nutrients from surface soil. Composts only influenced the magnitude of changes in micronutrient concentrations, as similar seasonal trends occurred for both compost-amended and unamended soils.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biortech.2007.03.066

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • It cannot be ruled out that the biochar delivered more micro-nutrients, but considering that urine and compost both contain all essential micro-nutrients, it is unlikely that the extra micro-nutrients delivered by the biochar would explain the high increase in pumpkin yield compared with the urine-only treatment.

    “It cannot be ruled out that the biochar delivered more micro-nutrients, but considering that urine and compost both contain all essential micro-nutrients [68], it is unlikely that the extra micro-nutrients delivered by the biochar would explain the high increase in pumpkin yield compared with the urine-only treatment.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Provin, T. L., Wright, A. L., Hons, F. M., Zuberer, D. A., & White, R. H.
Affiliations
  • Texas A&M University (US)
  • University of Florida (US)
Corresponding author
Wright, Alan L.
Venue
Bioresource Technology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-05
Volume
99
Issue
7
Pages
2672-2679
ISSN
0960-8524 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2063594064
Cited by
13
References
26
Citations by year
2021: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2015: 2
FWCI
0.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Bioresource Technology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Turfgrass Adaptation and Management
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Micronutrient Interactions and Effects
Keywords
compost application, Cynodon dactylon, soil micronutrients, seasonal dynamics, manganese, iron, copper, zinc, dissolved organic carbon, turfgrass, nutrient leaching, precipitation, winter dormancy, plant-available nutrients
MeSH terms
Poaceae, Metals, Seasons, Soil

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review