Analysis of light regime in continuous light distributions in photobioreactors
Abstract
Maximum photobioreactor (PBR) efficiency is a must in applications such as the obtention of microalgae-derived fuels. Improving PBR performance requires a better understanding of the "light regime", the varying irradiance that microalgal cells moving in a dense culture are exposed to. We propose a definition of light regime that can be used consistently to describe the continuously varying light patterns in PBRs as well as in light/dark cycles. Equivalent continuous and light/dark regimes have been experimentally compared and the results show that continuous variations are not well represented by light/dark cycles, as had been widely accepted. It has been shown that a correct light regime allows obtaining photosynthetic rates higher than the corresponding to continuous light, the so-called "flashing light effect" and that this is possible in commercial PBRs. A correct PBR operation could result in photosynthetic efficiency close to the optimum eight quanta per O(2).
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The light regime is defined by the amplitude, frequency and duty cycle of the light intensity fluctuation.
“The received temporal light signal is termed the 'light regime', which is defined by the amplitude, frequency and duty cycle of the light intensity fluctuation [100,103,104].”
From Modeling and Simulation of Photobioreactors with Computational Fluid Dynamics—A Comprehensive Review (2022) · cites this paper as [104]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 38 · Cited by 64
- Authors
- Brindley, C., Acién Fernández, F. G., & Fernández-Sevilla, J. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Almería (ES)
- Corresponding author
- Fernández-Sevilla, J.M.
- Venue
- Bioresource Technology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-02
- Volume
- 102
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 3138-3148
- ISSN
- 0960-8524 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2075642731
- Cited by
- 64
- References
- 38
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 1.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Bioresource Technology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Algal biology and biofuel production
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Fluid Dynamics and Mixing
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms
- Keywords
- photobioreactors, light regime, microalgae, irradiance, light-dark cycle, photosynthetic efficiency, photosynthetic rate
- MeSH terms
- Computer Simulation, Equipment Design, Light, Models, Theoretical, Scattering, Radiation, Computer-Aided Design, Equipment Failure Analysis, Photobioreactors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review