Cited by 385Thermochemical Biomass Conversion ProcessesThermal and Kinetic AnalysisBiofuel production and bioconversion

Effects of cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin on thermochemical conversion characteristics of the selected biomass

Pasangulapati, Vamsee, Ramachandriya, Karthikeyan D., Kumar, Ajay, Wilkins, Mark R., Jones, Carol L., Huhnke, Raymond L.·2012·Bioresource Technology

Abstract

The objective of this study was to investigate effects of biomass constituents (cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin) on biomass thermal decomposition and gas evolution profiles of four biomass materials. Switchgrass, wheat straw, eastern redcedar and dry distilled grains with solubles (DDGS) were selected as the biomass materials. No significant difference was observed in the weight loss profiles of switchgrass, wheat straw and eastern redcedar even though their cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin contents were considerably different. The weight loss kinetic parameters were also not significantly different except for activation energy of the eastern redcedar. However, biomass composition did significantly affect gas evolution profiles. The higher contents of cellulose and hemicellulose in switchgrass and wheat straw may have resulted in their higher CO and CO(2) concentrations as compared to eastern redcedar. On the other hand, higher lignin content in eastern redcedar may have resulted in significantly its high CH(4) concentration.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biortech.2012.03.036

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Lignin has more carbon than cellulose and hemicellulose.

    “The lignin that has more carbon than the other two polymeric constituents of biomass (Table 4) is thermally more stable and takes a larger share in the final solid product.”

    From A Comprehensive Review on Biomass Torrefaction (2014) · cites this paper as Pasangulapati et al. (2012)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pasangulapati, V., Ramachandriya, K. D., Kumar, A., Wilkins, M. R., Jones, C. L., & Huhnke, R. L.
Affiliations
Oklahoma State University (US)
Venue
Bioresource Technology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-06
Volume
114
Pages
663-669
ISSN
0960-8524 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1964596848
Cited by
385
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 43 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 44 · 2021: 50 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 1
FWCI
9.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Bioresource Technology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation (EPS-0814361)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Thermal and Kinetic Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Biofuel production and bioconversion
Keywords
biomass composition, cellulose, hemicellulose, lignin, thermochemical conversion, thermal decomposition, gas evolution, weight loss kinetics, activation energy, switchgrass, wheat straw, Juniperus virginiana, distillers grains with solubles, carbon dioxide, methane, carbon monoxide
MeSH terms
Cellulose, Hot Temperature, Lignin, Methane, Polysaccharides, Biomass, Plant Components, Aerial

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review