Cited by 2,871Biofuel production and bioconversionEnvironmental Impact and SustainabilityBioenergy crop production and management

Environmental, economic, and energetic costs and benefits of biodiesel and ethanol biofuels

Open access
Hill, Jason, Nelson, Erik, Tilman, David, Polasky, Stephen, Tiffany, Douglas·2006·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Negative environmental consequences of fossil fuels and concerns about petroleum supplies have spurred the search for renewable transportation biofuels. To be a viable alternative, a biofuel should provide a net energy gain, have environmental benefits, be economically competitive, and be producible in large quantities without reducing food supplies. We use these criteria to evaluate, through life-cycle accounting, ethanol from corn grain and biodiesel from soybeans. Ethanol yields 25% more energy than the energy invested in its production, whereas biodiesel yields 93% more. Compared with ethanol, biodiesel releases just 1.0%, 8.3%, and 13% of the agricultural nitrogen, phosphorus, and pesticide pollutants, respectively, per net energy gain. Relative to the fossil fuels they displace, greenhouse gas emissions are reduced 12% by the production and combustion of ethanol and 41% by biodiesel. Biodiesel also releases less air pollutants per net energy gain than ethanol. These advantages of biodiesel over ethanol come from lower agricultural inputs and more efficient conversion of feedstocks to fuel. Neither biofuel can replace much petroleum without impacting food supplies. Even dedicating all U.S. corn and soybean production to biofuels would meet only 12% of gasoline demand and 6% of diesel demand. Until recent increases in petroleum prices, high production costs made biofuels unprofitable without subsidies. Biodiesel provides sufficient environmental advantages to merit subsidy. Transportation biofuels such as synfuel hydrocarbons or cellulosic ethanol, if produced from low-input biomass grown on agriculturally marginal land or from waste biomass, could provide much greater supplies and environmental benefits than food-based biofuels.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0604600103

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Industrialized nations with biofuels targets, such as the United States and members of the European Union, are unlikely to have the land base needed to meet their growing demand for current-generation agricultural biofuels.

    “Industrialized nations with biofuels targets, such as the United States and members of the European Union, are unlikely to have the land base needed to meet their growing demand for current-generation agricultural biofuels, which are largely produced from food and feed crops (e.g., maize, oil palm, rapeseed, soy)”

    From Carbon payback times for crop-based biofuel expansion in the tropics: the effects of changing yield and technology (2008) · cites this paper as Hill et al 2006

    The Results section (Potential U.S. Supply; page not provided) finds that even dedicating all U.S. corn and soybean production to biofuels would offset only 12% of gasoline and 6% of diesel demand. The Discussion likewise says food-based biofuels can meet only a small portion of transportation energy needs. The paper does not assess European Union land availability or biofuel targets, and its analysis concerns corn and soybeans rather than all the feedstocks listed in the citing sentence. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Including generalized estimates of upstream emissions to grow, produce and transport would decrease biofuel carbon offsets used here by ∼80% for corn ethanol, ∼20% for cane-ethanol and ∼60% for soy-biodiesel, thereby increasing the carbon payback time.

    “However, including generalized estimates of upstream emissions to grow, produce and transport would decrease biofuel carbon offsets used here by ∼ 80% for cornethanol, ∼ 20% for cane-ethanol and ∼ 60% for soy-biodiesel (Hill et al 2006), thereby increasing the carbon payback time.”

    From Carbon payback times for crop-based biofuel expansion in the tropics: the effects of changing yield and technology (2008) · cites this paper as Hill et al 2006

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Soybean biodiesel yields approximately 93% more energy than is invested in its production.

    “The concept of energy balance, or Net Energy Balance (NEB), evaluates the amount of energy from the biofuel to the fossil energy input necessary for feedstock cultivation and conversion; for instance, soybean biodiesel yields approximately 93% more energy than is invested in its production [103].”
  • Bioethanol is currently produced by fermentation of agricultural crops, mainly sugarcane in Brazil and/or corn in the US.

    “Currently, bioethanol is produced by fermentation of agricultural crops, mainly sugarcane in Brazil (Goldemberg 2007) and/or corn in the US (Hill et al. 2006).”
  • Biodiesel yields 93% more energy than that invested in its production.

    “biodiesel yields 93% more [99]”

    From The potential of biofuels from first to fourth generation (2023) · cites this paper as [99]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 27 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. [4]Shapouri H., Duffield J., McAloon A., Wang M. The 2001 Net Energy Balance of Corn-Ethanol. Washington, DC: U.S. Dept. of Agriculture; 2004. [Google Scholar]
  2. [6]Pimentel D. Nat. Resources Res. 2003;12:127–134. [Google Scholar]
  3. [7]Patzek T. W. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 2004;23:519–567. [Google Scholar]
  4. [8]Pimentel D., Patzek T. W. Nat. Resources Res. 2005;14:65–76. [Google Scholar]
  5. [9]Vitousek P. M., Aber J. D., Howarth R. W., Likens G. E., Matson P. A., Schindler D. W., Schlesinger W. H., Tilman D. G. Ecol. Appl. 1997;7:737–750. [Google Scholar]
  6. [10]Carpenter S. R., Caraco N. F., Correll D. L., Howarth R. W., Sharpley A. N., Smith V. H. Ecol. Appl. 1998;8:559–568. [Google Scholar]
  7. [14]U.S. Department of Agriculture: National Agricultural Statistics Service. Feed Grains Database. Washington, DC: Dept. of Agriculture; 2005. [Google Scholar]
  8. [15]Tiffany D. G., Eidman V. R. In: Agriculture as a Producer and Consumer of Agriculture. Outlaw J., Collins K. J., Duffield J. A., editors. Cambridge, MA: CABI; 2005. [Google Scholar]
  9. [16]U.S. Department of Energy, Energy Information Administration. Natural Gas Monthly. Washington, DC: Dept. of Energy; 2006. DOE Publ. No. EIA-0130(2006/04) [Google Scholar]
  10. [17]U.S. Department of Energy, Energy Information Administration. Petroleum Marketing Monthly. Washington, DC: Dept. of Energy; 2006. DOE Publ. No. EIA-0380(2005/06) [Google Scholar]
  11. [20]Interagency Agricultural Projections Committee. USDA Agricultural Baseline Projections to 2015. Washington, DC: Dept. of Agriculture; 2006. DOE Publ. No. OCE-2006-1. [Google Scholar]
  12. [21]Renewable Fuels Association. Industry Statistics. Washington, DC: Renewable Fuels Assoc; 2006. [Google Scholar]
  13. [22]U.S. Department of Energy, Energy Information Administration. Annual Energy Outlook 2006 With Projections to 2030. Washington, DC: Dept. of Energy; 2006. DOE Publ. No. EIA-0383(2006) [Google Scholar]
  14. [23]National Biodiesel Board. How Much Biodiesel Has Been Sold in the U.S.? Jefferson City, MO: Natl. Biodiesel Board; 2005. [Google Scholar]
  15. [26]Sheehan J., Aden A., Paustian K., Killian K., Brenner J., Walsh M., Nelson R. J. Ind. Ecol. 2004;7:117–146. [Google Scholar]
  16. [29]Tiffany D. G., Eidman V. R. In: Food, Agriculture, and the Environment: Economic Issues. Defrancesco E., Galletto L., Thiene M., editors. Milan: FrancoAngeli; 2005. pp. 325–340. [Google Scholar]
  17. [32]U.S. Department of Energy, Energy Information Administration. International Energy Outlook. Washington, DC: Dept. of Energy; 2006. DOE Publ. No. EIA-0484 (2006) [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hill, J., Nelson, E., Tilman, D., Polasky, S., & Tiffany, D.
Affiliations
University of Minnesota (US)
Corresponding author
Tilman, David
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2006-07-25
Volume
103
Issue
30
Pages
11206-11210
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2164449327
Cited by
2,871
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 36 · 2025: 57 · 2024: 60 · 2023: 86 · 2022: 89 · 2021: 138 · 2020: 103 · 2019: 126 · 2018: 147 · 2017: 155 · 2016: 149 · 2015: 171 · 2014: 175 · 2013: 242 · 2012: 228
FWCI
117.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Bowdoin - Digital Commons (Bowdoin College) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (0080382)
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  • Bush Foundation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Biofuel production and bioconversion
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Bioenergy crop production and management
Keywords
biodiesel, ethanol, corn ethanol, soybean biodiesel, net energy analysis, life cycle assessment, greenhouse gas emissions, air pollutants, pesticide use, biofuel subsidies, oil displacement, biofuel economics, cellulosic ethanol, biomass waste
MeSH terms
Agriculture, Air Pollutants, Air Pollution, Ethanol, Vehicle Emissions, Energy-Generating Resources, Environment, Fossil Fuels, Gasoline, Humans, Petroleum, Glycine max, Biomass

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review