Cited by 349Algal biology and biofuel productionAquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton DynamicsInnovations in Aquaponics and Hydroponics Systems

Reduction of water and energy requirement of algae cultivation using an algae biofilm photobioreactor

Ozkan, Altan, Kinney, Kerry, Katz, Lynn, Berberoglu, Halil·2012·Bioresource Technology

Abstract

This paper reports the construction and performance of an algae biofilm photobioreactor that offers a significant reduction of the energy and water requirements of cultivation. The green alga Botryococcus braunii was cultivated as a biofilm. The system achieved a direct biomass harvest concentration of 96.4 kg/m(3) with a total lipid content 26.8% by dry weight and a productivity of 0.71 g/m(2) day, representing a light to biomass energy conversion efficiency of 2.02%. Moreover, it reduced the volume of water required to cultivate a kilogram of algal biomass by 45% and reduced the dewatering energy requirement by 99.7% compared to open ponds. Finally, the net energy ratio of the cultivation was 6.00 including dewatering. The current issues of this novel photobioreactor are also identified to further improve the system productivity and scaleup.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biortech.2012.03.055

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The water footprints of microalgae biomass production are 2857 L kg-1 for open raceway pond and 1618 L kg-1 for biofilm photobioreactor.

    “The water footprints of microalgae biomass production are 2857 L kg -1 , and 1618 L kg -1 for open raceway pond, and biofilm photobioreactor, respectively (Ozkan et al., 2012).”

    From Potential of microalgae as a sustainable feed ingredient for aquaculture (2021) · cites this paper as Ozkan et al., 2012

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 35 · Cited by 349

Authors
Ozkan, A., Kinney, K., Katz, L., & Berberoglu, H.
Affiliations
The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Venue
Bioresource Technology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-06
Volume
114
Pages
542-548
ISSN
0960-8524 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2117306018
Cited by
349
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 37 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 3
FWCI
8.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Bioresource Technology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Algal biology and biofuel production
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Innovations in Aquaponics and Hydroponics Systems
Keywords
Botryococcus braunii, algae cultivation, lipid content, biomass productivity, net energy ratio, scale-up
MeSH terms
Chlorophyta, Energy Metabolism, Equipment Design, Water, Biofilms, Equipment Failure Analysis, Photobioreactors, Batch Cell Culture Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review