Validation of a simple model accounting for light and temperature effect on microalgal growth
Abstract
A new model is set up to represent the effect of temperature and light on microalgae growth, and predict the productivity of outdoor microalgae based processes. This model includes three cardinal temperatures (T(min), T(opt), and T(max)) and three parameters associated to the light response (μ(max), I(opt) and α). These six parameters have a clear biological meaning which makes model calibration straightforward. An algorithm to estimate both the model parameters and their associated confidence regions is developed. Results show that this model can successfully represent experimental data sets from 15 species cultivated in different experimental conditions. The model predictions, when compared to realistic temperatures recorded in outdoor photobioreactors or raceways, point out a strong decrease of productivity due to over-warming for most commercial species.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The most recommended temperature model is the cardinal temperature one with inflection.
“The most recommended model is the cardinal temperature one with inflection [186].”
From Modeling and Simulation of Photobioreactors with Computational Fluid Dynamics—A Comprehensive Review (2022) · cites this paper as [186]
The cardinal temperature model with inflection is suitable to capture the temperature-dependency of growth for many microalgae species.
“It was shown that this model is suitable to capture the temperature-dependency of growth for many microalgae species [186]”
From Modeling and Simulation of Photobioreactors with Computational Fluid Dynamics—A Comprehensive Review (2022) · cites this paper as [186]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 36 · Cited by 349
- Authors
- Bernard, O., & Rémond, B.
- Venue
- Bioresource Technology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-11
- Volume
- 123
- Pages
- 520-527
- ISSN
- 0960-8524 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1988340685
- Cited by
- 349
- References
- 36
- Citations by year
- 2026: 20 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 47 · 2020: 41 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 10
- FWCI
- 4.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Bioresource Technology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Agence Nationale de la Recherche
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Algal biology and biofuel production
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Aquaculture Nutrition and Growth
- Keywords
- microalgae growth, temperature effects, light response, growth models, cardinal temperatures, model parameter estimation, photobioreactors, raceways, microalgae productivity, open-field cultivation
- MeSH terms
- Calibration, Light, Models, Biological, Temperature, Reproducibility of Results, Microalgae
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review