Cited by 96Biofuel production and bioconversionThermochemical Biomass Conversion ProcessesAnaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A kinetic model for hydrothermal pretreatment of sugarcane straw

Open access
dos Santos Rocha, Martha Suzana Rodrigues, Pratto, Bruna, de Sousa, Ruy, Almeida, Renata Maria Rosas Garcia, Cruz, Antonio José Gonçalves da·2017·Bioresource Technology

Abstract

This work presents kinetic models of cellulose and hemicellulose extraction during hydrothermal pretreatment of sugarcane straw. Biomass was treated under conditions of 180, 195, and 210°C, using a solid/liquid ratio of 1:10 (w/v). In this study, cellobiose, glucose, formic acid and hydroxymethylfurfural (from cellulosic fraction) and xylose, arabinose, acetic acid, glucuronic acid and furfural (from hemicellulosic fraction) were taken into account in the kinetic parameters determination. The global search algorithm Simulated Annealing was used to fit the models. At 195°C/15min, 85% of hemicellulose and 21% of cellulose removal was reached. For the confidence regions, it was observed that it can be broad, which is coherent with the fact that the parameters are highly correlated. Kinetic models proposed for both cellulosic and hemicellulosic fractions degradation fitted well to the experimental data.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biortech.2016.12.087

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 46 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
dos Santos Rocha, M. S. R., Pratto, B., de Sousa, R., Almeida, R. M. R. G., & Cruz, A. J. G. D.
Affiliations
  • Universidade Federal de São Carlos (BR)
  • Universidade Federal de Alagoas (BR)
Corresponding author
Cruz, Antonio José Gonçalves da
Venue
Bioresource Technology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-03
Volume
228
Pages
176-185
ISSN
0960-8524 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2567293112
Cited by
96
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 11
FWCI
4.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Bioresource Technology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
  • Ministério da Educação
  • Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
  • Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia e Inovação
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Biofuel production and bioconversion
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Fuel Technology › Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
Keywords
hydrothermal pretreatment, sugarcane straw, cellulose degradation, hemicellulose degradation, simulated annealing, kinetic parameter estimation, 5-hydroxymethylfurfural, furfural, cellobiose, xylose, arabinose, glucuronic acid, acetic acid, formic acid
MeSH terms
Cellulose, Hydrolysis, Kinetics, Polysaccharides, Refuse Disposal, Biomass, Saccharum

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review