CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 31

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cost effective dry anaerobic digestion in textile bioreactors: Experimental and economic evaluation

Patinvoh, Regina J., Osadolor, Osagie A., Sárvári Horváth, Ilona, Taherzadeh, Mohammad J.·2017·Bioresource Technology
DOI 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.08.081
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The aim of this work was to study dry anaerobic digestion (dry-AD) of manure bedded with straw using textile-based bioreactor in repeated batches. The 90-L reactor filled with the feedstocks (22-30% total solid) and inoculum without any further treatment, while the biogas produced were collected and analyzed. The digestate residue was also analyzed to check its suitability as bio-fertilizer. Methane yield after acclimatization increased from 183 to 290NmlCH 4 /gVS, degradation time decreased from 136 to 92days and the digestate composition point to suitable bio-fertilizer. The results then used to carry out economical evaluation, which shows dry-AD in textile bioreactors is a profitable method of handling the waste with maximum payback period of 5years, net present value from $7,000 to $9,800,000 (small to large bioreactors) with internal rate of return from 56.6 to 19.3%.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.08.081

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 33

  1. Al Seadi, 2012, Quality management of digestate from biogas plants used as fertiliser, IEA Bioenergy, 4
  2. Angelidaki, 2009, Defining the biomethane potential (BMP) of solid organic wastes and energy crops: a proposed protocol for batch assays, Water Sci. Technol., 59, 927, 10.2166/wst.2009.040 · DOI
  3. Bolzonella, 2003, Semi-dry thermophilic anaerobic digestion of the organic fraction of municipal solid waste: focusing on the start-up phase, Bioresour. Technol., 86, 123, 10.1016/S0960-8524(02)00161-X · DOI
  4. Börjesson, 2007, Environmental systems analysis of biogas systems—Part II: the environmental impact of replacing various reference systems, Biomass Bioenergy, 31, 326, 10.1016/j.biombioe.2007.01.004 · DOI
  5. Chattopadhyay, 2009, Municipal solid waste management in Kolkata, India–a review, Waste Manage., 29, 1449, 10.1016/j.wasman.2008.08.030 · DOI
  6. Chen, 2016, A cost analysis of food waste composting in Taiwan, Sustainability, 8, 1210, 10.3390/su8111210 · DOI
  7. Deng, 2016, Effect of temperature on continuous dry fermentation of swine manure, J. Environ. Manage., 177, 247, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.04.029 · DOI
  8. Fouda, S.E.-S., 2011. Nitrogen availability of biogas residues (PhD Dissertation), Technical University of München.
  9. Gebrezgabher, 2010, Economic analysis of anaerobic digestion—a case of Green power biogas plant in The Netherlands, NJAS-Wagen. J. Life Sci., 57, 109, 10.1016/j.njas.2009.07.006 · DOI
  10. Guendouz, 2010, Dry anaerobic digestion in batch mode: Design and operation of a laboratory-scale, completely mixed reactor, Waste Manage., 30, 1768, 10.1016/j.wasman.2009.12.024 · DOI
  11. Gunaseelan, 2009, Biomass estimates, characteristics, biochemical methane potential, kinetics and energy flow from Jatropha curcus on dry lands, Biomass Bioenergy, 33, 589, 10.1016/j.biombioe.2008.09.002 · DOI
  12. Hicks, 1928, Distribution of carbon/nitrogen ratio in the various organs of the wheat plant at different periods of its life history, New Phytol., 27, 108, 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1928.tb06735.x · DOI
  13. Ho, 2013, Evaluation of water pollution caused by different pig–farming systems in Hungyen province of Vietnam, Kyushu Univ. Int. Reposit, 58, 159
  14. Karak, 2012, Municipal solid waste generation, composition, and management: the world scenario, Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol., 42, 1509, 10.1080/10643389.2011.569871 · DOI
  15. Li, 2013, A pyrosequencing-based metagenomic study of methane-producing microbial community in solid-state biogas reactor, Biotechnol Biofuels, 6, 10.1186/1754-6834-6-3 · DOI
  16. Li, 2011, Solid-state anaerobic digestion for methane production from organic waste, Renew. Sustainable Energy Rev., 15, 821, 10.1016/j.rser.2010.07.042 · DOI
  17. Makádi, 2012, Digestate: a new nutrient source – review
  18. Mata-Alvarez, 2000, Anaerobic digestion of organic solid wastes. An overview of research achievements and perspectives, Bioresour. Technol., 74, 10.1016/S0960-8524(00)00023-7 · DOI
  19. Meissl, 2007, High quality composts by means of cocomposting of residues from anaerobic digestion, Compost Sci. Util., 15, 78, 10.1080/1065657X.2007.10702316 · DOI
  20. Mähnert, 2009, Kinetic study of biogas production from energy crops and animal waste slurry: effect of organic loading rate and reactor size, Environ. Technol., 30, 93, 10.1080/09593330802246640 · DOI
  21. Möller, 2010, Substrate inputs, nutrient flows and nitrogen loss of two centralized biogas plants in southern Germany, Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosys., 87, 307, 10.1007/s10705-009-9340-1 · DOI
  22. Osadolor, 2014, Introducing textiles as material of construction of ethanol bioreactors, Energies, 7, 7555, 10.3390/en7117555 · DOI
  23. Patinvoh, 2017, Dry fermentation of manure with straw in continuous plug flow reactor: reactor development and process stability at different loading rates, Bioresour. Technol., 224, 197, 10.1016/j.biortech.2016.11.011 · DOI
  24. Poggi-Varaldo, 1999, Quality of anaerobic compost from paper mill and municipal solid wastes for soil amendment, Water Sci. Technol., 40, 179, 10.2166/wst.1999.0710 · DOI
  25. Rajendran, 2013, Experimental and economical evaluation of a novel biogas digester, Energy Convers. Manage., 74, 183, 10.1016/j.enconman.2013.05.020 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Ruggieri, 2009, Recovery of organic wastes in the Spanish wine industry. Technical, economic and environmental analyses of the composting process, J. Clean. Prod., 17, 830, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.12.005 · DOI
  27. Strange, 2002, Overview of waste management options: their efficacy and acceptability, Issues Environ. Sci. Technol., 18, 1
  28. Svensson, 2004, The fertilizing effect of compost and biogas residues from source separated household waste, J. Agric. Sci., 142, 461, 10.1017/S0021859604004514 · DOI
  29. Trendewicz, 2013, Techno-economic analysis of solid oxide fuel cell-based combined heat and power systems for biogas utilization at wastewater treatment facilities, J. Power Sources, 233, 380, 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.01.017 · DOI
  30. Wang, 2011, Biohydrogen and methane production by co-digestion of cassava stillage and excess sludge under thermophilic condition, Bioresour. Technol., 102, 3833, 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.12.012 · DOI
  31. Wang, 2013, Enhanced fermentative hydrogen production from cassava stillage by co-digestion: The effects of different co-substrates, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 38, 6980, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.04.004 · DOI
  32. Zhang, 2012, Physical properties of wheat straw varieties cultivated under different climatic and soil conditions in three continents, Am. J. Eng. Appl. Sci., 5, 98, 10.3844/ajeassp.2012.98.106 · DOI
  33. Zhou, 2015, A new strategy for co-composting dairy manure with rice straw: Addition of different inocula at three stages of composting, Waste Manage., 40, 38, 10.1016/j.wasman.2015.03.016 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Patinvoh, R. J., Osadolor, O. A., Sárvári Horváth, I., & Taherzadeh, M. J.
Venue
Bioresource Technology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-12
Volume
245
Pages
549-559
ISSN
0960-8524
DOI
10.1016/j.biortech.2017.08.081
Cited by
31
References
1
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review