CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 48

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Production of algal biomass for its biochemical profile using slaughterhouse wastewater for treatment under axenic conditions

Azam, Rifat, Kothari, Richa, Singh, Har Mohan, Ahmad, Shamshad, Ashokkumar, Veeramuthu, Tyagi, V.V.·2020·Bioresource Technology
DOI 10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123116
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Slaughterhouse produce large amount of wastewater, containing high pollutant load in terms of protein, fats and meat pieces, might lead to source of non-point contamination. Various concentrations (25%, 50%, 75%, and 100%) of slaughterhouse wastewater were used to increase the algal biomass production, pollutants removal and biochemical profile analysis under controlled conditions of C. pyrenoidosa. Results showed that the maximum biomass yield 430 mg L -1 was achieved at 50% concentration of wastewater to other concentration of wastewater. Direct relation was observed in between pollution load and nutrient load of SHWW with biochemical profile of C. pyrenoidosa. The COD/BOD ratio (1.9) was found to be significant on the scale of degradability by algal biomass. Sufficient nutrient removal efficiencies (23-42%, 18-48%) and pollutant load efficiencies (17-31%, 7-29%) were observed. Findings showed that slaughterhouse wastewater is rich in nutrients, which can be utilized for algal biomass production and wastewater remediation for future endeavors.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123116

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Algae are among the most favorable bio-sorbents because they have high biosorption capacity and are easily available in large amounts.

    “Algae are considered one of the sources of the most favorable types of bio-sorbents because they have high biosorption capacity and are easily available in large amounts (Singh and Singh, 2017;Azam et al., 2020).”

    From Biomass-Based Adsorbents for Removal of Dyes From Wastewater: A Review (2021) · cites this paper as Azam et al., 2020

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 42

  1. Ahmad, 2013, The potential of Chlorella vulgaris for wastewater treatment and biodiesel production, Pak. J. Bot., 1, 461
  2. Ahmad, 2019, Optimization of nutrients from wastewater using RSM for augmentation of Chlorella pyrenoidosa with enhanced lipid productivity, FAME content, and its quality assessment using fuel quality index, Biomass Convers. Biorefin., 1
  3. Ahmad, 2018, Optimization of nutrient stress using C. pyrenoidosa for lipid and biodiesel production in integration with remediation in dairy industry wastewater using response surface methodology, 3 Biotech, 8, 326, 10.1007/s13205-018-1342-8 · DOI
  4. Al-Gheethi, 2016, Treatment of wastewater from car washes using natural coagulation and filtration system, Mate. Sci. Eng., 136, 12
  5. Bustillo-Lecompte, C., Mehrvar, M. 2017. Slaughterhouse wastewater: treatment, management and resource recovery. In: Robina Farooq, Zaki Ahmad (Eds.). Physico-chemical Wastewater Treatment and Resource Recovery. pp. 153–174. · DOI
  6. Bustillo-Lecompte, 2016, Slaughterhouse wastewater characterization and treatment: an economic and public health necessity of the meat processing industry in Ontario, Canada, J. Geosci. Environ Protect., 04, 175, 10.4236/gep.2016.44021 · DOI
  7. Cataldo, 1975, Rapid colorimetric determination of nitrate in plant tissue by nitration of salicylic acid, Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal., 1, 71, 10.1080/00103627509366547 · DOI
  8. Dreywood, R. 1946. Qualitative test for carbohydrate material. Ind. Eng. Chem. 8, 499–499. · DOI
  9. Emparan, 2019, Role of phycoremediation for nutrient removal from wastewaters, Appl. Ecol. Environ. Res., 1, 889, 10.15666/aeer/1701_889915 · DOI
  10. Gao, 2016, Continuous microalgae cultivation in aquaculture wastewater by a membrane photobioreactor for biomass production and nutrients removal, Ecolo. Engine., 92, 55, 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2016.03.046 · DOI
  11. Jais, 2017, The dual roles of phycoremediation of wet market wastewater for nutrients and heavy metals removal and microalgae biomass production, Clean. Technol. Environ., 1, 37, 10.1007/s10098-016-1235-7 · DOI
  12. Jais, 2015, Removal of nutrients removal of nutrients and selected heavy metals in wet market wastewater by using microalgae Scenedesmus sp, Mech. Mater, 773, 1210
  13. Kitrungloadjanaporn, 2017, Nutrient removal from the effluent of swine slaughterhouse wastewater by Chlorella vulgaris TISTR 8580, Int. J. Adv. Agric. Environ. Eng., 4, 28
  14. Kothari, 2017, Microalgal cultivation for value-added products: a critical enviro-economical assessment, 3 Biotech, 7, 243, 10.1007/s13205-017-0812-8 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Kothari, 2012, Experimental study for growth potential of unicellular alga Chlorella pyrenoidosa on dairy waste water: an integrated approach for treatment and biofuel production, Bioresour. Technol., 116, 466, 10.1016/j.biortech.2012.03.121 · DOI
  16. Kothari, 2013, Production of biodiesel from microalgae Chlamydomonas polypyrenoideum grown on dairy industry wastewater, Bioresour. Technol., 144, 499, 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.06.116 · DOI
  17. Kothari, 2010, Waste-to-energy: A way from renewable energy sources to sustainable development, Rene. and Sust. Ener. Revi., 14, 3164, 10.1016/j.rser.2010.05.005 · DOI
  18. Kumar, 2018, Production of biodiesel and bioethanol using algal biomass harvested from fresh water river, Renew. Energ., 116, 606, 10.1016/j.renene.2017.10.016 · DOI
  19. Kundu, P., Debsarkar, A., Mukherjee, S. 2013. Treatment of slaughter house wastewater in a sequencing batch reactor: performance evaluation and biodegradation kinetics. BioMed. Res. Int. 2013. · DOI
  20. Liu, 2020, Application of effluent from WWTP in cultivation of four microalgae for nutrients removal and lipid production under the supply of CO2, Rene. Ener., 149, 708, 10.1016/j.renene.2019.12.092 · DOI
  21. Lowry, 1951, Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent, J. Biol. Chem., 193, 265, 10.1016/S0021-9258(19)52451-6 · DOI
  22. Lu, 2015, Growing Chlorella sp. on meat processing wastewater for nutrient removal and biomass production, Bioresour. Technol., 198, 189, 10.1016/j.biortech.2015.08.133 · DOI
  23. Mackinney, 1941, Absorption of light by chlorophyll solutions, J. Biol. Chem., 2, 315, 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)51320-X · DOI
  24. Maizatul, 2017, An overview of the utilisation of microalgae biomass derived from nutrient recycling of wet market wastewater and slaughterhouse wastewater, Int Aq. Res., 9, 177, 10.1007/s40071-017-0168-z · DOI
  25. Murugesan, 2010, Phycoremediation of poultry wastewater by micro alga, Biosci. Biotech. Res. Comm., 2, 14
  26. Myra, 2015, Biological treatment of meat processing wastewater using anaerobic sequencing batch reactor (ASBR), Int. Res. J. Biol. Sci., 3, 66
  27. Pathak, 2015, Experimental and kinetic studies for phycoremediation and dye removal by Chlorella pyrenoidosa from textile wastewater, J. Environ. Manag., 163, 270, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.08.041 · DOI
  28. Pathak, 2014, Phycoremediation of textile wastewater by unicellular microalga Chlorella pyrenoidosa, Cell. Mol. Biol., 60, 35
  29. Rasoul-Amini, 2014, Removal of nitrogen and phosphorus from wastewater using microalgae free cells in bath culture system, Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol., 2, 126, 10.1016/j.bcab.2013.09.003 · DOI
  30. Rath, 2012, Microalgal bioremediation: current practices and perspectives, J. Biochem. Technol., 3, 299
  31. Safafar, 2016, Enhancement of protein and pigment content in two Chlorella species cultivated on industrial process water, J. Mar. Sci Eng., 4, 84, 10.3390/jmse4040084 · DOI
  32. Salama, 2017, Recent progress in microalgal biomass production coupled with wastewater treatment for biofuel generation, Renew. Sustain. Energ. Rev., 79, 1189, 10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.091 · DOI
  33. Singh, 2019, Bio-fixation of flue gas from thermal power plants with algal biomass: overview and research perspectives, J. Environ. Manage., 245, 519, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.01.043 · DOI
  34. Sletten, 1961, Modified stannous chloride reagent for orthophosphate determination, JAM. Water. Works. Ass., 8, 1031, 10.1002/j.1551-8833.1961.tb00742.x · DOI
  35. Tan, 2019, Strategies for enhanced biomass and lipid production by Chlorella pyrenoidosa culture in starch processing wastewater, J. Clean. Prod., 236, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117671 · DOI
  36. Taşkan, 2016, Performance of mixed algae for treatment of slaughterhouse wastewater and microbial community analysis, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 23, 20474, 10.1007/s11356-016-7241-9 · DOI
  37. Van Duong, 2015, Growth and lipid accumulation of microalgae from fluctuating brackish and sea water locations in South East Queensland—Australia, Front. Plant. Sci.
  38. Venckus, 2017, Green algae Chlorella vulgaris cultivation in municipal wastewater and biomass composition, J. Environ. Eng. Landsc. Manag., 1, 56, 10.3846/16486897.2016.1245661 · DOI
  39. Wang, 2010, Cultivation of green algae Chlorella sp. in different wastewaters from municipal wastewater treatment plant, Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol., 4, 1174, 10.1007/s12010-009-8866-7 · DOI
  40. Xu, 2017, Attached microalgae cultivation and nutrients removal in a novel capillary-driven photo-biofilm reactor, Alga. Rese., 27, 198, 10.1016/j.algal.2017.08.028 · DOI
  41. Yaakob, 2018, Characteristics of chicken slaughterhouse wastewater, Chem. Eng. Transac., 63, 637
  42. Zhao, 2019, Cultivation of Chlorella pyrenoidosa in anaerobic wastewater: the coupled effects of ammonium, temperature and pH conditions on lipids compositions, Bioresour. Technol., 284, 90, 10.1016/j.biortech.2019.03.117 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Azam, R., Kothari, R., Singh, H. M., Ahmad, S., Ashokkumar, V., & Tyagi, V. V.
ORCID
Azam, Rifat
Venue
Bioresource Technology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-06
Volume
306
Pages
123116
ISSN
0960-8524
DOI
10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123116
Cited by
48
References
0
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review