Cited by 360Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removalCoagulation and Flocculation StudiesEnzyme-mediated dye degradation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 197 of the 199 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 24 of the 93 sources its claims cite were checked for support.

Biomass-Based Adsorbents for Removal of Dyes From Wastewater: A Review

Open access
Aragaw, Tadele Assefa, Bogale, Fekadu Mazengiaw·2021·Frontiers in Environmental Science

Abstract

Dyes, especially azo dyes contained in wastewaters released from textile, pigment, and leather industries, are entering into natural waterbodies. This results in environmental deterioration and serious health damages (for example carcinogenicity and mutagenesis) through food chains. Physiochemical, membrane processes, electrochemical technology, advanced oxidation processes, reverse osmosis, ion exchange, electrodialysis, electrolysis, and adsorption techniques are commonly used conventional treatment technologies. However, the limitations of most of these methods include the generation of toxic sludge, high operational and maintenance costs. Thus, technological advancements are in use to remediate dyes from effluents. Adsorption using the nonconventional biomass-based sorbents is the greatest attractive alternatives because of their low cost, sustainability, availability, and eco-friendly. We present and reviewed up-to-date publications on biomass-based sorbents used for dye removal. Conceptualization and synthesizing their state-of-the-art knowledge on their characteristics, experimental conditions used were also discussed. The merits and limitations of various biosorbents were also reflected. The maximum dye adsorption capacities of various biosorbents were reviewed and synthesized in the order of the biomass type (algae, agricultural, fungal, bacterial, activated carbon, yeast, and others). Surface chemistry, pH, initial dye concentration, temperature, contact time, and adsorbent dose as well as the ways of the preparations of materials affect the biosorption process. Based on the average dye adsorption capacity, those sorbents were arranged and prioritized. The best fit of the adsorption isotherms (for example Freundlich and Langmuir models) and basic operating parameters on the removal dyes were retrieved. Which biomass-based adsorbents have greater potential for dye removal based on their uptake nature, cost-effectiveness, bulk availability, and mono to multilayer adsorption behavior was discussed. The basic limitations including the desorption cycles of biomass-based adsorbent preparation and operation for the implementation of this technology were forwarded.

Overview

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This review synthesizes literature on biomass-based adsorbents (algae, agricultural, fungal, bacterial, activated carbon, yeast, and others) for removing dyes from wastewater, emphasizing adsorption as a low-cost, eco-friendly alternative to conventional treatments. It reports that performance depends on surface chemistry, pH, initial dye concentration, temperature, contact time, adsorbent dose, and preparation/modification, with many biomasses achieving up to 99% removal.

Key findings

  • Dye pollution is large: 0.7–1.6 million tons of dyes are produced yearly, with 10–15% discharged as wastewater; conventional treatments often generate toxic sludge and have high operational/maintenance costs.
  • Biomass-based adsorbents can outperform commercial activated carbon in some cases: *Spirulina platensis* reached 482.2 mg/g for Reactive Red 120 versus 267.2 mg/g for commercial activated carbon at pH 2 and 25°C; other reported capacities include 190.2 mg/g for Reactive Yellow 86 on free *Lentinus concinnus*, 279.14 mg/g for crystal violet on citric acid-functionalized brown algae, 225.2 mg/g for methylene blue on polysulfone–*E. coli* composite, and 212.05 mg/g for methylene blue/malachite green on brewer’s yeast biomass.
  • Adsorption isotherms and kinetics varied, but Langmuir and pseudo-second-order models were most commonly best fits across fungal, algal, bacterial, yeast, and agricultural adsorbents; pH controls whether anionic or cationic dyes are favored.
  • Cost and regeneration are key: biochar from groundnut shell had the least cost (₹0.91/g) and highest capacity (46.3 mg/g) among coconut shell, groundnut shell, and rice husk for Basic Red 09; mandarin peel adsorbent maintained >50% capacity after four cycles, while banana peel removal decreased from 100 to 64% (MG) and 76% (MB) after five uses.

Methods

  • Narrative review and synthesis of up-to-date publications on biomass-based sorbents for dye removal, covering characteristics, experimental conditions, merits/limitations, and adsorption capacities by biomass type.
  • Literature search included PubMed with the query “biosorbents for the removal of dyes” (2002–2020; 209 papers) and Google Scholar; retrieved publications were filtered and prioritized by relevance to the review scope.
  • Data were compiled into tables summarizing adsorbent source/species, modification, dye type, adsorption capacity, fitted isotherm/kinetic models, mixing time, sorbent dose, dye concentration, pH, and removal efficiency.

Limitations

  • The paper states most biomass-based adsorption studies are laboratory-scale and use simulated wastewater, so cost analysis is limited, particularly for microbial biomass; comparison among studies is difficult because each uses different parameters for efficiency determination.
  • The paper states desorption/regeneration, scaling up, cost analysis, and safe disposal of spent adsorbents and eluents remain constraints; more work is needed in mixed/multi-pollutant systems representative of real wastewater.
  • Evident from the text: this is a narrative review without quantitative meta-analysis, and its PubMed search is described as not comprehensive (Google Scholar was added), so synthesized rankings and comparisons depend on the selected literature.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fenvs.2021.764958

Cites

197 of 197 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

24 of 93 cited sources checked · 14 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Premisecitation

    Adsorption has a limitation of sludge generation (spent adsorbents after use) as other removal processes.

    “Comparatively, the adsorption method is considered a better treatment process in wastewater treatment technologies due to ease of operation, convenience, and simplicity of design (Aragaw and Angerasa, 2020;Aragaw, 2020), but it has a limitation of sludge generation (spent adsorbents after use) as other removal processes (Patel, 2021;Vakili et al., 2019).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Patel, 2021 source
    • cites Vakili et al., 2019 source
  • Premisecitation

    Adsorption is considered a better treatment process in wastewater treatment technologies due to ease of operation, convenience, and simplicity of design.

    “Comparatively, the adsorption method is considered a better treatment process in wastewater treatment technologies due to ease of operation, convenience, and simplicity of design (Aragaw and Angerasa, 2020;Aragaw, 2020), but it has a limitation of sludge generation (spent adsorbents after use) as other removal processes (Patel, 2021;Vakili et al., 2019).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Aragaw and Angerasa, 2020 source

      The Introduction describes adsorption as a potential technology for dye removal from wastewater and says natural adsorbents are widely used owing to their simplicity. It does not establish that adsorption is better than other wastewater treatments because of ease of operation, convenience, or simplicity of design. No page number is available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.82)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Aragaw, 2020

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Patel, 2021 source

      Patel is cited for the limitation in the second clause, not for the preceding claim about ease of operation and design. The Introduction identifies spent adsorbent as a solid hazardous waste produced after use, but does not describe it as sludge or establish that adsorption generates sludge as other removal processes do. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation

    Debaryomyces hansenii F39A adsorbed 90% of Reactive Red 141 and 50% of Reactive Blue 19 at pH 6.0, initial dye concentration 100 mg/L, and 2 g/L biomass dose.

    “They found that 90% of RR 141 and 50% of RB 19 was adsorbed at pH 6.0, initial dye concentration of 100 mg/L, and 2 g/L biomass dose, but when the dosage of biomass was increased to 6 g/L the adsorption of RB 19 increased to 90%.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Ruscasso et al., 2021 source
  • Premisecitation

    Charcoal, peat, chitin, microbial biomass (fungi, bacteria, yeast), wood bark, and other agricultural and industrial wastes are frequently used bio-adsorbents.

    “Charcoal, peat, chitin, microbial biomass (fungi, bacteria, yeast, etc.), wood GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT | bark, and other agricultural and industrial wastes are frequently used bio-adsorbents (Kumar et al., 2021).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Kumar et al., 2021 source
  • Premisecitation

    Biological methods are the most promising for treating dye-containing wastewater because of environmentally safe treatment capability.

    “Among them, biological methods are the most promising due to environmentally safe treatment capability (Przystaś et al., 2018;Batool and Valiyaveettil, 2021).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Przystaś et al., 2018 source
    • cites Batool and Valiyaveettil, 2021 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 29
  • It may state two separate claims as one. 59
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 4
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    Coal-derived activated carbon is supposed to be the most efficient type of activated carbon in adsorption; its treatment efficiency is 99.8% and it can treat various types of dyes.

    “Coal-derived activated carbon was supposed to be the most efficient type of activated carbon in adsorption.The efficiency of treatment is 99.8%, and it can treat various types of dyes (Yeow et al., 2021).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Yeow et al., 2021 source
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    Excessive exposure to dye causes skin irritation, respiratory problems, and some dyes increase cancer risk in humans.

    “Excessive exposure to dye causes skin irritation, respiratory problems and some dyes even increase the risk of cancer in humans (Amirza et al., 2017).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Amirza et al., 2017 source

      The Introduction (page not provided) says dyes can cause skin irritation and describes potential carcinogenic effects, including effects on human cells. It does not mention respiratory problems or establish an exposure threshold for these harms; it also frames carcinogenicity as potential rather than a demonstrated increase in human cancer risk. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    0.7-1.6 million tons of dyes are delivered yearly and 10-15% of this volume is disposed of as wastewater, making them major water pollutants.

    “To satisfy the modern need, it is assessed that 0.7-1.6 million tons of dyes are delivered yearly and 10-15% of this volume is disposed of as wastewater, making it major water pollutants (Bhatia et al., 2017;Varghese et al., 2019;Syafiuddin and Fulazzaky, 2020).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Bhatia et al., 2017 source
    • cites Varghese et al., 2019 source
    • cites Syafiuddin and Fulazzaky, 2020 source

      The Introduction (page not supplied) reports approximately 700,000 metric tons of annual dye production and a 10–15% loss of colorants during dyeing. It also describes environmental harm from dyes released into water, but does not give the 1.6-million-ton upper estimate or state that all of the 10–15% loss is disposed of as wastewater. (LLM, conf=0.87)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    Reactive dyes are stable and anionic, and display resistance toward light.

    “Dyes are usually classified based on their chemical structure, such as anionic, cationic, and nonionic; reactive dyes are stable and anionic, and display resistance toward light (Heidari et al., 2019;Dai et al., 2018).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Heidari et al., 2019 source
    • cites Dai et al., 2018 source
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    Biotreatment of dye-containing wastewater effluent by fungal cells is cost-effective, easily applicable, eco-friendly, and has no nutrient needs.

    “Biotreatment of dyecontaining wastewater effluent by fungal cell was provided a cost-effective, easily applicable, eco-friendly (Salem et al., 2019;(Argumedo-Delira et al., 2021), and absence of nutrient needs (Ghany et al., 2019).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Salem et al., 2019 source
    • cites Argumedo-Delira et al., 2021 source

      The Introduction says biological dye-removal methods, including fungal treatments, are less costly than chemical methods and are eco-friendly. It does not establish that fungal-cell treatment is easily applicable. The separate claim about having no nutrient needs is attributed to Ghany et al., not to this source. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Ghany et al., 2019 source
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    Algae are among the most favorable bio-sorbents because they have high biosorption capacity and are easily available in large amounts.

    “Algae are considered one of the sources of the most favorable types of bio-sorbents because they have high biosorption capacity and are easily available in large amounts (Singh and Singh, 2017;Azam et al., 2020).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Singh and Singh, 2017 source

      The Biosorption section describes algae as potent biosorbents, citing their availability in fresh and salt water, relatively high surface area, and high binding affinity. It does not establish that algae are easily available in large amounts; availability across habitats is not evidence of quantity. (LLM, conf=0.83)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Azam et al., 2020 source
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    Adsorption is a very effective, cheap, and commonly used method among all available dye removal techniques.

    “Adsorption is found to be a very effective, cheap, and commonly used method among all available dye removal techniques (Kandisa and Saibaba KV, 2016).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Kandisa and Saibaba KV, 2016 source
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    Major drawbacks of AOPs for dye removal include sludge production in Fenton reagent, formation of toxic byproduct in photocatalyst, and high cost due to expensive reagents and energy consumption.

    “Sludge production in the case of Fenton reagent, formation of toxic byproduct in the case of photocatalyst, and high cost due to the use of expensive reagents (for example, H 2 O 2 ) and energy consumption (generation of O 3 or UV radiation) are the major drawback of AOPs for dye removal (Cuerda-Correa et al., 2020;Moosavi et al., 2020).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Cuerda-Correa et al., 2020 source

      The paper identifies Fenton sludge in its Conclusions and states that expensive reagents such as H₂O₂ and energy for ozone or UV make AOPs costly. It also warns that AOPs can produce toxic byproducts, but does not establish this specifically as a drawback of photocatalysis for dye removal; the review focuses on antibiotics in water. The cited passages have no page numbers in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Moosavi et al., 2020 source

      Table 1 in the Introduction identifies sludge production as a disadvantage of Fenton reagents, toxic byproduct formation for photocatalysts, and high operational cost for ozonation. It does not attribute AOP costs to H₂O₂, ozone generation, or UV radiation; it instead lists low-cost reagents for Fenton treatment and low operational cost for photocatalysis. (LLM, conf=0.89)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    Phosphoric acid stimulates bond cleavage in agricultural waste biomass to increase carbon yield and promotes dye biosorption by grafting phosphate functions onto the biomass and enhancing acid functions involved in dye fixation.

    “For example, phosphoric acid stimulates bond cleavage in agricultural waste biomass to increase the carbon yield (Bello et al., 2019).Phosphoric acid promoted dye biosorption by grafting phosphate functions onto the biomass and enhancing the acid functions involved in dye fixation (Benabbas et al., 2021).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Bello et al., 2019 source
    • cites Benabbas et al., 2021 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The authors may not put it forward as true. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    Recovery of powder-activated carbons is very costly, time-consuming, and not very efficient, making them unsuitable for industrial applications, and reusability is almost impossible for low-cost products.

    “Some authors stated that the recovery step of powder-activated carbons is very costly, time-consuming, and not very efficient so that they are not suitable for industrial applications (Moosavi et al., 2020), and more particularly reusability is almost impossible for low-cost products (Saha et al., 2020).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Moosavi et al., 2020 source
    • cites Saha et al., 2020 source
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    The pH of the solution affects both the chemistry of the aqueous solution and the binding sites present on the surface of adsorbents.

    “The pH of the solution affects both the chemistry of the aqueous solution and the binding sites present on the surface of adsorbents (Kumar et al., 2021).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Kumar et al., 2021 source
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingnone given

    Most fungal species potentially achieved more than 90% removal of a specific dye, except Pleurotus ostreatus, Aspergillus flavus, and Diaporthe schini, which had removal efficiencies of 53%, 53.62%, and 87%, respectively.

    “Most species of fungi potentially achieved more than 90% of a specific type of dye except Pleurotus ostreatus, Aspergillus flavus, and Diaporthe schini which had a removal efficiency of 53%, 53.62, and 87%, respectively.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    Langmuir isotherm was fitted by most biosorption studies, indicating that monolayer coverage adsorption was the dominant process.

    “Table 4 revealed that Langmuir isotherm was fitted by most biosorption studies, indicating that the monolayer coverage adsorption was the dominant process.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    Spirulina and Chlorella species are common microalgae studied and achieved up to 99% dye removal efficiency.

    “Table 4 revealed that Spirulina and Chlorella species are common types of microalgae studied and achieved up to 99% removal efficiency.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    The pseudo-2nd-order kinetic model showed the best model fit for most biosorption studies.

    “Similarly, the pseudo-2 nd -order kinetic model showed the best model fit.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingnone given

    Sargassum species of macroalgae are commonly studied and can remove more than 90% of dyes.

    “Similarly, Sargassum species of macro algae are commonly studied and can remove more than 90% of dyes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Findingown data

    The retrieved publications were adsorbents prepared from different biomasses activated and/or modified with various chemicals or techniques.

    “The retrieved publications were found as adsorbents prepared from different biomasses activated and/or modified with various chemicals or techniques.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingcitation

    Most yeast biosorption studies showed best fit for Langmuir isotherm and pseudo-second-order kinetic models, suggesting dominance of monolayer chemoadsorption, except some yeast species where Freundlich and Temkin isotherm models fit best.

    “Table 6 revealed that most studies showed the best fit for Langmuir isotherm and pseudo-second-order kinetic models, suggesting the dominance of monolayer chemoadsorption except some yeast species in which the Freundlich and Temkin isotherm models showed the best fit model.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim.

    Findingnone given

    Each study reviewed has considered different parameters for efficiency determination.

    “Although most biomasses achieved a good removal efficiency, each study reviewed has considered different parameters for efficiency determination.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Findingnone given

    Among available adsorbents, biomass-based treatments are recent materials employed in various sectors to remove dyes and other pollutants.

    “Among different available adsorbents, biomass-based treatments are found to be the recent materials employed at various sectors to remove dyes and other pollutants.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingnone given

    Conventional dye treatment methods have limitations related to operation efficiency, total cost, energy, and generation of toxic by-products, although they have good performances for a particular pollutant.

    “The review reveals that the conventional dye treatment methods have some particular limitations related to operation efficiency, total cost, energy, and generation of toxic by-products, although they have good performances to a particular pollutant.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingreasoning

    Most studies on biomass-based adsorption have been conducted on the laboratory scale using simulated wastewater, so cost analysis of biomass-based adsorbents is limited, particularly for microbial biomass.

    “Unfortunately, most studies on biomassbased adsorption have been conducted on the laboratory scale using simulated wastewater, so that the cost analysis of the biomass-based adsorbents is limited, particularly for microbial biomass.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim.

    Findingnone given

    The bio-sorption process is affected by environmental parameters such as pH, initial dye concentration, temperature, contact time, and adsorbent dose, as well as the ways of preparation of materials.

    “The bio-sorption process is affected by various environmental parameters such as pH, initial dye concentration, temperature, contact time, and adsorbent dose as well as the ways of the preparations of materials.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Findingnone given

    Most studies on biomass-based adsorption concentrated on the removal of a single pollutant.

    “Most of the studies on biomass-based adsorption concentrated on the removal of a single pollutant”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationown data

    Publication counts from 2017 to 2020 are highly consistently increased, suggesting that nonconventional adsorbents from biomass are recently attracting attention for dye removal.

    “As it can be observed, publication counts from 2017 to 2020 are highly consistently increased suggested that the nonconventional adsorbents from biomass are recently attracting attention for dye removal.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    In low pH solutions, the removal rate of anionic dyes increases while the removal rate of cationic dyes is lower; conversely, high pH increases cationic dye removal and lowers anionic dye removal.

    “It has been observed that (Table 3) in low pH solutions, the removal rate of anionic dyes is increased while the removal rate of cationic dyes is lower.Conversely, a high pH solution increases the removal of the cationic dyes and causes a low removal percentage for anionic dyes (Ahmed and Ebrahim, 2020).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Ahmed and Ebrahim, 2020

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    Activated carbon effectively removes dyes from industrial wastewater effluents, but it has constraints including capital cost, energy consumption, and loss of ability after sorption-desorption cycles.

    “Dyes from the industrial wastewater effluents are effectively removed by using activated carbon; however, it has some constraints such as capital cost, energy consumption, and loss of its ability after sorption-desorption cycles.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    Yeast has favorable applications in treating dye-containing solutions due to high capacity to adsorb and accumulate pollutants, fast growth, faster decolorization than filamentous fungi, and ability to survive unfavorable environments.

    “Yeast is a single-celled organism, a member of the kingdom of fungi that have many favorable applications in the treatment of dye-containing solutions due to their high capacity to adsorb and accumulate pollutants, fast growth, faster decolorization than filamentous fungi, and the ability to survive unfavorable environments (Sen et al., 2016).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Sen et al., 2016 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisenone given

    Bioadsorbents may be activated with acid/base (such as HCl, NaOH) and thermal activation, and some are composited with inorganic and/or organic nanomaterials.

    “For example, the bioadsorbents may be activated with acid/base (such as HCl, NaOH) and thermal activation, and also some are composited with inorganic and/or organic nanomaterials.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation

    Dyes block sunlight penetration thereby inhibiting photosynthesis.

    “It also blocks sunlight penetration thereby inhibiting photosynthesis (Bello et al., 2015;Dey et al., 2017).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Bello et al., 2015 source
    • cites Dey et al., 2017 source
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisenone given

    Surface chemistry, pH, initial dye concentration, temperature, contact time, adsorbent dose, and preparation methods affect the biosorption process.

    “Surface chemistry, pH, initial dye concentration, temperature, contact time, and adsorbent dose as well as the ways of the preparations of materials affect the biosorption process.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one. The quote only partly states this claim.

    Premisecitation

    Magnetically responsive brown algae (Sargassum horneri) had maximum sorption capacity for acridine orange of 193.8 mg/g but lower for malachite green at 110.4 mg/g at 2 h contact time.

    “The sorbent had maximum sorption capacity for acridine orange (193.8 mg/g) but lower for malachite green (110.4 mg/ g) at 2 h contact time.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Angelova et al., 2016 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Interpretationnone given

    Dye removal from wastewater using bio-based adsorbents is a promising alternative.

    “Dye removal from wastewater using bio-based adsorbents is a promising alternative.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    Removal of color by coagulation is strongly dependent on structure of dye molecules (chromophores and auxochromes), so structural considerations are important when choosing coagulant.

    “The removal of color by coagulation is strongly dependent on the structure of dye molecules (chromophores and auxochromes), so structural considerations of dyes are very important when choosing the most appropriate coagulant for dye removal (Mcyotto et al., 2021).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Mcyotto et al., 2021 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation

    AOPs involve generation of oxidizing species such as hydroxyl radicals and sulfate radicals in sufficient quantity to interact with organic compounds.

    “Advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) involve the generation of oxidizing species such as hydroxyl radicals and sulfate radicals in sufficient quantity to interact with the organic compounds of the medium (Wang and Wang, 2020;Duan et al., 2020).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Wang and Wang, 2020 source
    • cites Duan et al., 2020 source
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    Membrane filtration has advantages including appreciable resistance to temperature, good resistance to adverse chemical environment, and excellent performance of color removal.

    “It has some advantages such as appreciable resistance to temperature, good resistance to adverse chemical environment, and excellent performance of color removal (Roy et al., 2018).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Roy et al., 2018 source
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    Fungal biomasses are composed of sugars, proteins, lipids, and functional groups such as alcohols, carboxyl, and alkanes, which give them properties useful for biosorption in wastewater treatment.

    “Fungal biomasses are composed of sugars, proteins, and lipids, and different functional groups (alcohols, carboxyl, and alkanes) which provide it certain properties and applications as a biosorption in treatments of wastewater (Isaza-Pérez et al., 2020;Ahmed and Ebrahim, 2020).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Isaza-Pérez et al., 2020 source
    • cites Ahmed and Ebrahim, 2020

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisenone given

    Sludge generation, extra operational cost for sludge disposal, and high maintenance costs are major challenges in applying chemical precipitation.

    “Sludge generation, the extra operational cost for sludge disposal, and high maintenance costs are major challenges in applying this process.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisenone given

    Coagulation-flocculation is among the most widespread physiochemical processes for removal and destruction of coloring substances in wastewater.

    “Coagulation-flocculation is among the most widespread physiochemical processes for the removal and distraction of coloring substances in wastewater.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Premisecitation

    An optimum monolayer uptake capacity of 279.14 mg/g was reported for citric acid-functionalized brown algae modified algal adsorbent.

    “An optimum monolayer uptake capacity of 279.14 mg/g was reported for the modified algal adsorbent (Essekri et al., 2021).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Essekri et al., 2021 source
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    Bacteria have small size, ubiquity, and capability to grow under varying environmental conditions, making them good adsorbents.

    “Their small size, ubiquity, and capability to grow under varying environmental conditions make them good adsorbents (Singh et al., 2018).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Singh et al., 2018 source
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisereasoning

    Anionic dyes are removed in acidic conditions and cationic dyes such as methylene blue in alkaline conditions.

    “Anionic dyes are removed in acidic conditions and cationic dyes (e.g.MB) in alkaline conditions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Premisecitation

    The maximum sorption capacity for basic blue dye by Bacillus catenulatus JB-022 was 139.74 mg/g from the Langmuir adsorption isotherm.

    “The maximum sorption capacity for basic blue dye was found to be 139.74mg/g from the Langmuir adsorption isotherm.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Kim et al., 2015 source
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    Dyes released from textile, paper, leather, rubber, cosmetic, and printing industries are major pollutants in wastewater effluent and disturb the aquatic environment.

    “Various types of dyes and metal ions are the major pollutants encountered in wastewater effluent, which disturb the aquatic environment (Varghese et al., 2019;Saravanan et al., 2021).Dyes are organic compounds that are released from several industrial sources including textile, paper, leather, rubber, cosmetic, and printing industries (Piaskowski et al., 2018;Katheresan et al., 2018).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Varghese et al., 2019 source
    • cites Saravanan et al., 2021 source
    • cites Piaskowski et al., 2018 source
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Higher surface area, higher porosity, and low ash content lead to high adsorption capacity.

    “Higher surface area, higher porosity, and low ash content lead to high adsorption capacity.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    Among steam activation, carbon dioxide activation, and chemical activation, steam activation is the best environmentally and economically viable option, while chemical activation results in highest surface area and porosity.

    “Among the above three methods, steam activation is the best environmentally and economically viable option, while chemical activation results in the highest surface area and porosity (Rahimian and Zarinabadi, 2020).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Rahimian and Zarinabadi, 2020

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisenone given

    Application of waste organic materials and microbial biomasses is gaining increasing interest as effective, low-cost, and ecologically friendly sorbents.

    “The application of waste organic materials (e.g., compounds extracted from peels, leaves, barks) and microbial biomasses (fungus bio-sorbent, bacterial, and green algal biomasses) is gaining an increasing interest being effective, low-cost, and ecologically friendly sorbents.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    Membrane technologies have disadvantages including high cost of disposal of concentrated residue, high management costs, inability to deal with high flow rates, and frequent clogging of membrane pores by dye molecules.

    “Also worthy of note are disadvantages, among which the one linked to the high cost of disposal of the remaining concentrated residue following the separation, the high management costs and the inability to deal with high flow rates, and frequent clogging of membrane pores by the dye molecules (Collivignarelli et al., 2019).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Collivignarelli et al., 2019 source

      Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.

  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisenone given

    Advanced oxidation processes have been effectively investigated in removal of a variety of contaminants from water and wastewater.

    “Recently, advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) have been effectively investigated in the removal of a variety of contaminants from water and wastewater.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisereasoning

    Carboxyl groups have a negative charge at higher pH, resulting in electrostatic binding of cationic dyes.

    “The carboxyl groups have a negative charge at a higher pH, which results in electrostatic binding of the cationic dyes.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    Activated carbon has remarkable interior area, pore structure, high adsorption capacity, surface reactivity, and low cost compared to inorganic adsorbents such as zeolite.

    “Activated carbon (AC) is a commonly used adsorbent that refers to a group of carbon materials with high oscillation and high internal surface which are unique because of their remarkable interior area, pore structure, high adsorption capacity, surface reactivity, and low cost compared to inorganic adsorbents such as zeolite (Hasanzadeh et al., 2020).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Hasanzadeh et al., 2020 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Adsorption using nonconventional biomass-based sorbents is the greatest attractive alternative for dye removal because of low cost, sustainability, availability, and eco-friendliness.

    “Adsorption using the nonconventional biomass-based sorbents is the greatest attractive alternatives because of their low cost, sustainability, availability, and eco-friendly.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Biomass-based adsorbents are eco-friendly, low-cost, and have good surface characteristics.
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    Most conventional treatment methods have limitations including generation of toxic sludge, high operational and maintenance costs, and intricate technique.

    “However, the limitations of most of these methods include the generation of toxic sludge, high operational and maintenance costs, and the intricate technique involved in the treatment (Yahiaoui et al., 2021).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Yahiaoui et al., 2021 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation

    Adsorption involves valency forces through sharing or exchange of electrons between adsorbent and dye molecules by covalent forces and ion exchange.

    “The adsorption involves valency forces through the sharing or exchange of electrons between the adsorbent and dye molecules by covalent forces and ion exchange (Mohd Nasir et al., 2021).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Mohd Nasir et al., 2021 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    Activated carbon is a universal adsorbent for effluent treatment and is commonly used for removal of several pollutants.

    “Activated carbon is undoubtedly considered a universal adsorbent for effluent treatment and is commonly used for the remo//val of several pollutants (Rahimian and Zarinabadi, 2020).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Rahimian and Zarinabadi, 2020

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    Electrocoagulation is successful in removal of organic dyes, fine suspended particles, heavy metals, and oil and grease from diverse industrial effluents.

    “The EC process is successful in the removal of organic dyes, fine suspended particles, heavy metals, and oil and grease (or other heavier hydrocarbons) from diverse industrial effluents (Mondal et al., 2018).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Mondal et al., 2018 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Premisenone given

    Algae, yeast, bacterial, fungal, agro-waste, and plant debris are potential bioadsorbent sources.

    “Algae, yeast, bacterial, fungal, agro-waste, and plant debris are potential bioadsorbent sources.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    When pH is greater than pHpzc, cationic dye adsorption is favorable due to functional groups such as OH- and COO-, whereas anionic dye adsorption is favorable at pH less than pHpzc because adsorbent surfaces become positively charged.

    “When pH is greater than pH pzc , it is favorable for cationic dye adsorption due to the existence of functional groups (OH -, COO -), whereas anionic dye adsorption is favorable at pH less than pH pzc because the surfaces of adsorbents become positively charged (Zhou et al., 2019).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Zhou et al., 2019 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationown data

    Biomass-based adsorbents are attracting attention and are widely studied.

    “Owing to eco-friendly, low cost, and good surface characteristics, biomass-based adsorbents are attracting attention and are widely studied.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Biomass-based adsorbents are eco-friendly, low-cost, and have good surface characteristics.
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Premisenone given

    The pore volume of bioadsorbents and the functional groups of dyes are deciding factors in achieving high dye adsorption.

    “The pore volume of the bioadsorbents and functional groups of dyes are the deciding factors in achieving high dye adsorption.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    Congo red-loaded java citronella bio-adsorbent and commercial activated carbon showed 90.3% and 83.7% desorption, respectively, and the adsorbents were effective up to two adsorption-desorption cycles.

    “They found 90.3 and 83.7% desorption for biomass and commercial AC, respectively, from dye-loaded adsorbents (Saha et al., 2020).Moreover, the adsorbents were effective up to two adsorption-desorption cycles.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Saha et al., 2020 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    Common desorption methods include thermal treatment, acid treatment with H2SO4, HNO3, HCl, H3PO4, or NaOH, organic solvents such as methanol and ethanol, biological methods, and vacuum methods.

    “The common desorption methods include thermal treatment, acid (H 2 SO 4 , HNO 3 , HCl, H 3 PO 4 , NaOH) treatment, organic solvents (methanol and ethanol), biological methods, and vacuum methods (Hassan and Carr, 2021).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Hassan and Carr, 2021 source
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    The estimated cost of 1 g of adsorbent is ₹4.54, ₹0.91, and ₹0.97 for coconut shell, groundnut shell, and rice husk biochars, respectively, considering operational costs including manufacturing, maintenance, feedstock, transportation, labor, and distribution costs.

    “It was estimated that the cost of 1 g of adsorbent is ₹4.54, ₹0.91, and ₹0.97 for Coconut shell, Groundnut shell, and Rice husk, respectively, by considering operational costs including manufacturing costs, maintenance costs, feedstock costs, transportation costs, labor costs, and the distribution costs (Praveen et al., 2021).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Praveen et al., 2021 source
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    Residual yeast and diatomaceous earth had dye removal capacities of 8.66 mg/g and 7.96 mg/g, respectively, for Reactive Blue 160 at pH 2.

    “They found that the two biosorbents had a dye removal capacity of 8.66 mg/g and 7.96 mg/g respectively at a pH of 2 (Semião et al., 2020).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Semião et al., 2020 source
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationcitation

    The cost of bioadsorbents prepared from microbes and forest and agricultural waste is low compared with conventional treatment technologies, although the cited studies did not incorporate cost-benefit analysis.

    “Several authors reported that the cost of bioadsorbents prepared from microbes and forest and agricultural waste is low as compared with conventional treatment technologies, although they did not incorporate cost-benefit analysis in their study.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Interpretationnone given

    Biomass-derived adsorbents can be used on a large scale because of their huge availability.

    “One of the important features for the use of biomass-derived adsorbent for removal of dyes is that it can be used on a large scale because of its huge availability.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    Potato peel biochar is a promising adsorbent for removing Cibacron Blue dye, and its sorption ability follows the order calcined > activated > native materials.

    “Potato peel biochar was considered a promising adsorbent for removing Cibacron Blue dye.The sorption ability of this waste follows the order: calcined > activated > native materials (Bouhadjra et al., 2021).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Bouhadjra et al., 2021 source

      Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    Biochar prepared from Korean cabbage, rice straw, and wood chip can be used as an alternative to activated carbon to remove congo red and crystal violet, but Korean cabbage had better adsorption performance than the others.

    “Sewu et al. (2017) prepared biochar from Korean cabbage (KC), rice straw, and wood chip and can be used as an alternative to activated carbon to remove congo red and CV (Sewu et al., 2017), but KC had better absorption performance than others.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Sewu et al., 2017 source
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    Triethylenetetramine-modified pea peel biochar had adsorption capacity enhanced from 78.18 to 523.12 mg/g at equilibrium, and up to 98% of Acid Orange 7 was removed by the modified biochar while 96% was removed by unmodified biochar.

    “The adsorption capacity of the modified biochar was significantly enhanced from 78.18 to 523.12 mg/g at equilibrium.Up to 98% of AO7 was removed by triethylenetetramine-modified biochar, while 96% removal was achieved using unmodified biochar (El-Nemr et al., 2020).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites El-Nemr et al., 2020

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    Groundnut shell-based biochar had maximum adsorption capacity of 46.3 mg/g and the least cost of ₹0.91 per unit gram for Basic Red 09 dye removal.

    “Groundnut shellbased biochar had maximum adsorption capacity (46.3 mg/g) as well as the least cost (₹0.91)per unit gram of Basic Red 09 dye removal.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Praveen et al., 2021 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationnone given

    Among all adsorbents, biomass-derived adsorbent is preferred because it comparatively has the highest surface area, regardless of activation techniques, depending on source types, resulting in increased adsorption of contaminants.

    “Among all the adsorbents, the biomassderived adsorbent is preferred comparatively having the highest surface area, regardless of the activation techniques, depending on source types resulted in increasing the adsorption of the contaminants.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    Desorption after adsorption is important to regenerate and reuse used adsorbents, reduce waste generation, and keep process cost down.

    “After the adsorption process is accomplished, the desorption process is of great importance to regenerate and reuse those used adsorbents and to reduce the generation of waste as well as to keep the process price down (Zhou et al., 2019).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Zhou et al., 2019 source
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    Watermelon peel biochars had adsorption capacities ranging from 76.94 to 462.18 mg/g at pH 1.0, 3 h contact time, and room temperature, and achieved more than 96% removal of Acid Yellow 11.

    “The sorption study revealed that the capacity of prepared watermelon biochars was ranged between 76.94 and 462.18 mg/g at pH of 1.0, contact time of 3 h, and room temperature, and more than 96% removal of AY11 was achieved.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites El Nemr et al., 2020

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation

    Potential solutions for safely disposing of the final effluent include stabilization and immobilization, for example, using a cement-based system as a binding agent.

    “The potential solutions for safely disposing of the final effluent include stabilization and immobilization, for example, using a cement-based system as a binding agent (Dey et al., 2017).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Dey et al., 2017 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Difficulties are faced in comparing dye removal techniques.

    “Consequently, difficulties are faced in the comparison among them.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    Agricultural and forestry wastes are generally rich in cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin, and their surfaces comprise active groups including hydroxyl, carboxyl, amino, methyl, and others.

    “Agricultural and forestry wastes are generally rich in cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin.Its surface comprises several active groups including hydroxyl, carboxyl, amino, carboxyl, methyl, and so on (Zhou et al., 2019).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Zhou et al., 2019 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationnone given

    Distinctive surface chemistry with incorporated functional groups (alcohol, ketones, aldehydes, carboxylic, ether, phenol) gives bio-sorbents high attraction toward dye and makes biomass-based adsorbents effective for dye removal.

    “Distinctive surface chemistry with the incorporation of several functional groups (alcohol, ketones, aldehydes, carboxylic, ether, phenol) makes those bio-sorbents with a high attraction toward dye and makes the biomass-based adsorbents effective material for dye removal.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    The maximum monolayer adsorption capacities of brewer's yeast biomass for methylene blue, malachite green, and safranin O were 212.05, 212.05, and 76.77 mg/g, respectively.

    “The maximum monolayer adsorption capacities of BYB for MB, MG, and SO were 212.05, 212.05, and 76.77 mg/g, respectively.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Lin et al., 2019 source
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    Biomass-derived adsorbents are commonly cellulose-based structures and can produce good porous carbon that can adsorb various types of contaminants in the natural environment.

    “Moreover, the biomass-derived adsorbents are commonly cellulose-based structures and can produce a good porous carbon that can adsorb various types of contaminants in the natural environment.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Sherugar et al., 2022 source
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    Activated carbon from Persea Americana achieved 98% removal of basic yellow dye from wastewater and can substitute commercially available adsorbents.

    “Activated carbon provided from Persea Americana was suggested for basic yellow dye removal from wastewater with 98% removal.This activated carbon can substitute the commercially available adsorbents (Regti et al., 2017).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Regti et al., 2017 source
80 of 80
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Biomass-based adsorbents are eco-friendly, low-cost, and have good surface characteristics.

    “Owing to eco-friendly, low cost, and good surface characteristics, biomass-based adsorbents are attracting attention and are widely studied.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Commercial activated carbon cost is high for industrial applications.

    “Although the removal of dye using CAC is efficient, its cost is high for industrial applications.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Some biomass-based activated carbons prepared at laboratory scale have superior adsorption capacity to commercial activated carbon, but limited information exists on industrial application.

    “And some studies reported that the adsorption capacities of some biomass-based activated carbons prepared in the laboratory scale showed superior adsorption capacity than CAC; however, limited information is available on the application of biomass-based activated carbon at the industrial level.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Scaling up and cost analysis is a significant constraint for utilizing biomass-derived adsorbents for dye removal.

    “The other most significant constraint for utilizing biomassderived adsorbents for dye removal is the scaling up and cost analysis.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Recovery or regeneration procedures may require a significant amount of energy and solvents depending on the activation processes used.

    “In addition, the recovery or regeneration procedure may also need a significant amount of energy and solvents depending on the activation processes used.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Real dye-containing wastewater, such as textile industry wastewater, usually comprises a mixture of many dyes.

    “in real dye-containing wastewater, like textile industries that usually comprise a mixture of many dyes.”
6 of 6

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Groundnut biochar cost is assigned to two different units

    Minor

    The paper first gives ₹0.91 as the cost per gram of groundnut-shell adsorbent, then calls it the cost per gram of dye removed. Those cannot be the same unit when one gram of adsorbent has a stated dye-adsorption capacity of only 46.3 mg.

  • Fungal-removal summary omits Trametes below 90%

    Minor

    The text lists three fungi as exceptions to its claim of more than 90% removal, but Table 3 also reports 89.47% for Trametes sp. SC-10.

2 of 2

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 199 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Ahmad, Oil Palm Biomass-Based Adsorbents for the Removal of Water Pollutants-A Review, J. Environ. Sci. Health Part C, 29, 177, 10.1080/10590501.2011.601847 · DOI
  2. Amreen, 2020, Fast and Efficient Elimination of Malachite Green Dye by Activated Carbon Derived from Fresh Water Micro Algae : Kinetics and Thermodynamic Studies, 2581
  3. Gnanadoss, 2013, Bioremediation of Textile Dye Using White Rot Fungi: a Review, Rev. Int. J. Cur Res. Rev., 5, 1
  4. Gowtham, 2021, Experimental Study on Performance Assessment of Fenton and Photo- Fenton Oxidation Process for Methylene Blue, Proc. Int. Acad. Ecol. Environ. Sci., 11, 43
  5. Karthik, 2016, Bioremediation of Dye Bearing Effluents Using Microbial Biomass, Ecol. Environ. Conserv, 22, S423
  6. Mahmoudi, Investigation and Optimization of the Performance of Sono-Photo-Electro-Fenton Process for Removal of Acid Black 172 and Disperse Blue 56 from Polluted Water: Comparison of the Degradation Activity with electro-Fenton-based Processes, Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol., 1, 10.1007/s13762-021-03296-0 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Aragaw, T. A., & Bogale, F. M.
Affiliations
Bahir Dar University (ET)
Corresponding author
Aragaw, Tadele Assefa
Venue
Frontiers in Environmental Science
Published
2021-12-09
Volume
9
ISSN
2296-665X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4200145837
Cited by
360
References
199
Citations by year
2026: 102 · 2025: 83 · 2024: 84 · 2023: 58 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 2
FWCI
13.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Environmental Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Coagulation and Flocculation Studies
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology › Enzyme-mediated dye degradation
Keywords
dye removal, azo dyes, biomass-derived adsorbents, biosorption, textile wastewater, adsorption isotherms, Langmuir isotherm, Freundlich isotherm, multilayer adsorption, agricultural waste adsorbent, activated carbon, yeast, desorption, low-cost wastewater treatment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-11-08, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-08 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review