The DOI matches its Crossref record; 197 of the 199 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 24 of the 93 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
Biomass-Based Adsorbents for Removal of Dyes From Wastewater: A Review
Open accessAbstract
Dyes, especially azo dyes contained in wastewaters released from textile, pigment, and leather industries, are entering into natural waterbodies. This results in environmental deterioration and serious health damages (for example carcinogenicity and mutagenesis) through food chains. Physiochemical, membrane processes, electrochemical technology, advanced oxidation processes, reverse osmosis, ion exchange, electrodialysis, electrolysis, and adsorption techniques are commonly used conventional treatment technologies. However, the limitations of most of these methods include the generation of toxic sludge, high operational and maintenance costs. Thus, technological advancements are in use to remediate dyes from effluents. Adsorption using the nonconventional biomass-based sorbents is the greatest attractive alternatives because of their low cost, sustainability, availability, and eco-friendly. We present and reviewed up-to-date publications on biomass-based sorbents used for dye removal. Conceptualization and synthesizing their state-of-the-art knowledge on their characteristics, experimental conditions used were also discussed. The merits and limitations of various biosorbents were also reflected. The maximum dye adsorption capacities of various biosorbents were reviewed and synthesized in the order of the biomass type (algae, agricultural, fungal, bacterial, activated carbon, yeast, and others). Surface chemistry, pH, initial dye concentration, temperature, contact time, and adsorbent dose as well as the ways of the preparations of materials affect the biosorption process. Based on the average dye adsorption capacity, those sorbents were arranged and prioritized. The best fit of the adsorption isotherms (for example Freundlich and Langmuir models) and basic operating parameters on the removal dyes were retrieved. Which biomass-based adsorbents have greater potential for dye removal based on their uptake nature, cost-effectiveness, bulk availability, and mono to multilayer adsorption behavior was discussed. The basic limitations including the desorption cycles of biomass-based adsorbent preparation and operation for the implementation of this technology were forwarded.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This review synthesizes literature on biomass-based adsorbents (algae, agricultural, fungal, bacterial, activated carbon, yeast, and others) for removing dyes from wastewater, emphasizing adsorption as a low-cost, eco-friendly alternative to conventional treatments. It reports that performance depends on surface chemistry, pH, initial dye concentration, temperature, contact time, adsorbent dose, and preparation/modification, with many biomasses achieving up to 99% removal.
Key findings
- Dye pollution is large: 0.7–1.6 million tons of dyes are produced yearly, with 10–15% discharged as wastewater; conventional treatments often generate toxic sludge and have high operational/maintenance costs.
- Biomass-based adsorbents can outperform commercial activated carbon in some cases: *Spirulina platensis* reached 482.2 mg/g for Reactive Red 120 versus 267.2 mg/g for commercial activated carbon at pH 2 and 25°C; other reported capacities include 190.2 mg/g for Reactive Yellow 86 on free *Lentinus concinnus*, 279.14 mg/g for crystal violet on citric acid-functionalized brown algae, 225.2 mg/g for methylene blue on polysulfone–*E. coli* composite, and 212.05 mg/g for methylene blue/malachite green on brewer’s yeast biomass.
- Adsorption isotherms and kinetics varied, but Langmuir and pseudo-second-order models were most commonly best fits across fungal, algal, bacterial, yeast, and agricultural adsorbents; pH controls whether anionic or cationic dyes are favored.
- Cost and regeneration are key: biochar from groundnut shell had the least cost (₹0.91/g) and highest capacity (46.3 mg/g) among coconut shell, groundnut shell, and rice husk for Basic Red 09; mandarin peel adsorbent maintained >50% capacity after four cycles, while banana peel removal decreased from 100 to 64% (MG) and 76% (MB) after five uses.
Methods
- Narrative review and synthesis of up-to-date publications on biomass-based sorbents for dye removal, covering characteristics, experimental conditions, merits/limitations, and adsorption capacities by biomass type.
- Literature search included PubMed with the query “biosorbents for the removal of dyes” (2002–2020; 209 papers) and Google Scholar; retrieved publications were filtered and prioritized by relevance to the review scope.
- Data were compiled into tables summarizing adsorbent source/species, modification, dye type, adsorption capacity, fitted isotherm/kinetic models, mixing time, sorbent dose, dye concentration, pH, and removal efficiency.
Limitations
- The paper states most biomass-based adsorption studies are laboratory-scale and use simulated wastewater, so cost analysis is limited, particularly for microbial biomass; comparison among studies is difficult because each uses different parameters for efficiency determination.
- The paper states desorption/regeneration, scaling up, cost analysis, and safe disposal of spent adsorbents and eluents remain constraints; more work is needed in mixed/multi-pollutant systems representative of real wastewater.
- Evident from the text: this is a narrative review without quantitative meta-analysis, and its PubMed search is described as not comprehensive (Google Scholar was added), so synthesized rankings and comparisons depend on the selected literature.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
24 of 93 cited sources checked · 14 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Adsorption has a limitation of sludge generation (spent adsorbents after use) as other removal processes.
“Comparatively, the adsorption method is considered a better treatment process in wastewater treatment technologies due to ease of operation, convenience, and simplicity of design (Aragaw and Angerasa, 2020;Aragaw, 2020), but it has a limitation of sludge generation (spent adsorbents after use) as other removal processes (Patel, 2021;Vakili et al., 2019).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked - Premisecitation
Adsorption is considered a better treatment process in wastewater treatment technologies due to ease of operation, convenience, and simplicity of design.
“Comparatively, the adsorption method is considered a better treatment process in wastewater treatment technologies due to ease of operation, convenience, and simplicity of design (Aragaw and Angerasa, 2020;Aragaw, 2020), but it has a limitation of sludge generation (spent adsorbents after use) as other removal processes (Patel, 2021;Vakili et al., 2019).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked- cites Aragaw and Angerasa, 2020 source
The Introduction describes adsorption as a potential technology for dye removal from wastewater and says natural adsorbents are widely used owing to their simplicity. It does not establish that adsorption is better than other wastewater treatments because of ease of operation, convenience, or simplicity of design. No page number is available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Aragaw, 2020
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Patel, 2021 source
Patel is cited for the limitation in the second clause, not for the preceding claim about ease of operation and design. The Introduction identifies spent adsorbent as a solid hazardous waste produced after use, but does not describe it as sludge or establish that adsorption generates sludge as other removal processes do. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Debaryomyces hansenii F39A adsorbed 90% of Reactive Red 141 and 50% of Reactive Blue 19 at pH 6.0, initial dye concentration 100 mg/L, and 2 g/L biomass dose.
“They found that 90% of RR 141 and 50% of RB 19 was adsorbed at pH 6.0, initial dye concentration of 100 mg/L, and 2 g/L biomass dose, but when the dosage of biomass was increased to 6 g/L the adsorption of RB 19 increased to 90%.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Ruscasso et al., 2021 source
- Premisecitation
Charcoal, peat, chitin, microbial biomass (fungi, bacteria, yeast), wood bark, and other agricultural and industrial wastes are frequently used bio-adsorbents.
“Charcoal, peat, chitin, microbial biomass (fungi, bacteria, yeast, etc.), wood GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT | bark, and other agricultural and industrial wastes are frequently used bio-adsorbents (Kumar et al., 2021).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Kumar et al., 2021 source
- Premisecitation
Biological methods are the most promising for treating dye-containing wastewater because of environmentally safe treatment capability.
“Among them, biological methods are the most promising due to environmentally safe treatment capability (Przystaś et al., 2018;Batool and Valiyaveettil, 2021).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
- Premisecitation
Increasing the biomass dosage to 6 g/L increased adsorption of Reactive Blue 19 by Debaryomyces hansenii F39A to 90%.
“but when the dosage of biomass was increased to 6 g/L the adsorption of RB 19 increased to 90%.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Ruscasso et al., 2021 source
The Effect of the adsorbent dose section reports that increasing D. hansenii biomass from 1 to 6 g/L raised RB-19 removal from 34.03% to 84.63%. This supports the direction of the claim and the 6 g/L dosage, but the reported result is 84.63%, not 90%. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
A large pore volume allows binding of the highest number of dye molecules to the adsorbent.
“The presence of a large pore volume allows the binding of the highest number of dye molecules to the adsorbent (Hassan and Carr, 2021;Moosavi et al., 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked - Premisecitation
Dye adsorption abilities of agricultural and plant biomasses mainly depend on the types of dyes and the techniques of processing.
“Different studies show that the dye adsorption abilities of those biomasses mainly depend on the types of dyes as well as the techniques of processing (Deniz and Kepekci, 2017); (Kharat, 2015).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked - Premisecitation
The major solution for managing the adsorbent and eluent after dye removal is reuse and regeneration of the adsorbent several times using efficient regenerating agents.
“The major solution for this management is the reuse and regeneration of the adsorbent several times using efficient regenerating agents (Patel, 2021).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Patel, 2021 source
The Introduction and Conclusion describe regeneration as a solution to spent-adsorbent waste, and §2 describes repeated adsorption–desorption cycles using an eluting agent. The paper also discusses eluents for removing dyes, but these passages do not establish regeneration of the adsorbent as a solution for managing spent eluent after dye removal. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
The cost of forest wastes is only associated with transport cost from the storage place to the site where they will be utilized.
“The cost of forest wastes is only associated with the transport cost from the storage place to the site where they will be utilized (Adegoke and Bello, 2015).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Adegoke and Bello, 2015 source
- Findingown data
The publication trends with search query 'biosorbents for the removal of dyes' from PubMed found a total of 209 papers with publication date from 2002 to 2020.
“The publication trends with a search query “biosorbents for the removal of dyes” were conducted from PubMed (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/).The journal article publications were filtered and found a total of 209 papers with a publication date accustomed from 2002 to 2020.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
Cost analyses are neglected in most reported researches on biomass-based adsorption.
“Most of the reported researches are limited to laboratory assessments of adsorption capacity, while the cost analyses are neglected”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
Most reported researches on biomass-based adsorption are limited to laboratory assessments of adsorption capacity.
“Most of the reported researches are limited to laboratory assessments of adsorption capacity, while the cost analyses are neglected”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
Basic dyes, particularly methylene blue (MB) and crystal violet (CV), are among the frequently studied types of dye by most biomass-based adsorbents reviewed.
“Basic dyes (particularly MB and CV) are among frequently studied types of dye by most biomass-based adsorbents reviewed, of which 83-99% removal efficiency is reported.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
Most parts of each biomass reviewed show a remarkable removal efficiency of up to 99%.
“most parts of each biomass reviewed show a remarkable removal efficiency of up to 99%.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
Most biomasses achieved a good removal efficiency.
“Although most biomasses achieved a good removal efficiency, each study reviewed has considered different parameters for efficiency determination.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
For basic dyes, particularly MB and CV, 83-99% removal efficiency is reported by most biomass-based adsorbents reviewed.
“Basic dyes (particularly MB and CV) are among frequently studied types of dye by most biomass-based adsorbents reviewed, of which 83-99% removal efficiency is reported.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisereasoning
The pH dependence of anionic and cationic dye removal is due to involvement of H+ ions in the biomass-pollutant interaction process.
“This is due to the involvement of H + ions in the biomass-pollutant interaction process.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Functional groups such as hydroxyl and carboxyl on the surface of biomass-based adsorbents determine the hydrophobicity or hydrophilicity of biochar and its adsorptive mechanism.
“Functional groups (hydroxyl, carboxyl, etc.) on the surface of biomass-based adsorbents are important properties determining the hydrophobicity or hydrophilicity of biochar as well as their adsorptive mechanism (Law et al., 2021).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Law et al., 2021 source
- Premisecitation
Effective removal of dyes from effluent depends on the unique surface chemistry and presence of different functional groups in the microbial cell wall.
“The effective removal of dyes from the effluent depends on the unique surface chemistry with the presence of different functional groups in the cell wall of microorganisms (Karthik et al., 2016) such as alcohol, aldehydes, ketones, carboxylic, ether, phenolic, which make the bio-sorbents having a high affinity toward dye and attractive material for dye removal (Siddiqui et al., 2018).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Karthik et al., 2016
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Siddiqui et al., 2018 source
- Premisecitation
Combining biosorption with biodegradation by living cells can improve dye removal performance beyond high sorption capacity alone.
“Besides the high sorption capacity toward dye, the dye removal performance can be improved by combining the biosorption process with the biodegradation processes by living cells (Singh and Singh, 2017;Roy et al., 2018).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Interpretationreasoning
Bioadsorbents obtained from fungal, bacterial, algal, agricultural, or forest biomass are promising environmentally friendly adsorbents for dye and heavy metal removal.
“Therefore, bioadsorbents obtained from fungal, bacterial, algal, and agricultural, or forest biomass are promising environmentally friendly adsorbents utilized for dye and heavy metal removal.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Dye-adsorption capacity of some carbonaceous adsorbents derived from biomasses and their composites is noticeably higher than commercial activated carbon adsorbents.
“In contrast to these investigations, Hassan and Carr (2021) reviewed studies that revealed the dye-adsorption capacity of some carbonaceous adsorbents derived from biomasses and their composites is noticeably higher than the commercial activated carbon adsorbents (Hassan and Carr, 2021).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hassan and Carr, 2021 source
- Premisecitation
Bacillus catenulatus JB-022 achieved 58% removal of cationic basic blue dye at an initial concentration of 2000 mg/L.
“The isolate achieved 58% of cationic basic blue dye removal at the initial concentration of 2000 mg/L.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kim et al., 2015 source
- Premisecitation
The role of bacteria in bioremediation can be based on adsorption of contaminants from aqueous media through different mechanisms using dead biomasses.
“The role of bacteria in bioremediation applications can be based on the adsorption of contaminants from aqueous media (Sarvajith et al., 2018) through different mechanisms using dead biomasses (Roy et al., 2018).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Interpretationreasoning
Fungal biomass is a promising substitute for current technologies for dye decoloration and adsorption.
“In general, the use of fungal biomass is a promising substitute to the current technologies for dye decoloration and adsorption.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Many factors affect biomass biosorption capacities, including pH, biosorbent dose, initial dye concentration, temperature, and contact time.
“Many factors affect the biomass biosorption capacities including pH, bio-sorbent dose, initial dye concentration, temperature, contact time (Pearce et al., 2003).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Pearce et al., 2003 source
- Premisecitation
Pseudomonas spp. are relatively more successful than other bacteria for treating reactive dye-containing wastewater.
“As shown in Table 5 the literature revealed that Pseudomonas spp.are relatively more successful to treat reactive dyes-containing wastewater (Mishra and Maiti, 2018;Eslami et al., 2016).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Premisecitation
Haloalkaliphilic bacteria grown from textile wastewater removed 87% of Reactive Black and 85% of Reactive Red dyes.
“For example, 87% of Reactive Black and 85% of Reactive Red dyes were removed by haloalkaliphilic bacteria grown from textile wastewater (Seyedi et al., 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Seyedi et al., 2020 source
- Interpretationreasoning
Environmental factors such as temperature, pH, ionic strength, nutrient availability, and photodegradation through natural light, which can arise in seasonal and temporal variations, may affect structural characteristics and chemical constituents of biomass and thereby strongly affect the real adsorption capacity of biomass-based adsorbents.
“However, environmental factors such as temperature, pH, ionic strength, nutrient availability, photodegradation through natural light, which can arise in some seasonal and temporal variations, may affect structural characteristics and chemical constituents of the biomass.Thus, this can strongly affect the real adsorption capacity of biomass-based adsorbents.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Utilization of agricultural wastes and plants for adsorption of organic and inorganic pollutants is treated as an alternative to conventional wastewater treatment methods.
“The utilization of agricultural wastes and plants for the adsorptions of organic pollutants and inorganic pollutants is treated as an alternative to conventional wastewater treatment methods (Mo et al., 2018).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Mo et al., 2018
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Mandarin peel had a maximum adsorption capacity of 464 mg/g for safranin O at 0.4 g/L adsorbent dose, 2 h contact time, and 84.75% removal.
“Mandarin (Citrus reticulata) peel (MP) was utilized in the removal of SO from aqueous solution with the maximum adsorption capacity of 464 mg/g, 0.4 g/L adsorbent dose, 2 h contact time, and 84.75% removal.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Januário et al., 2021 source
- Premisecitation
The adsorption capacity of biosorbent prepared from mandarin peels was maintained more than 50% after four cycles, decreasing from 77.90 to 41.55 mg/g during removal of safranin orange dye.
“In another study, the adsorption capacity of biosorbent prepared from mandarin (Citrus reticulata) peels was maintained more than 50% after four cycles (from 77.90 to 41.55 mg/g) during the removal of Safranin orange (SO) dye.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Januário et al., 2021 source
- Interpretationreasoning
Comparison among biomass adsorbents is difficult because each study reviewed considered different parameters for efficiency determination.
“Thus, making the comparison among them difficult”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Activated carbon prepared from locust bean pod was approximately six times cheaper than conventional activated carbon.
“They concluded that the AC prepared from this plant material was approximately six times cheaper than conventional AC.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bello et al., 2019 source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
- Interpretationreasoning
Bioadsorbents are the most popular for adsorption of dyes and contaminants from wastewater due to their versatility, cost-effectiveness, nonhazardous byproducts, and easy operation.
“Among the adsorbents, bioadsorbents are the most popular for the adsorption of dyes, contaminants in general, from wastewater due to their versatility, cost-effectiveness.Also, their byproducts are not hazardous, and in addition to easy operation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
- Probably not a substantial claim. 29
- It may state two separate claims as one. 59
- The quote only partly states this claim. 4
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationCoal-derived activated carbon is supposed to be the most efficient type of activated carbon in adsorption; its treatment efficiency is 99.8% and it can treat various types of dyes.
“Coal-derived activated carbon was supposed to be the most efficient type of activated carbon in adsorption.The efficiency of treatment is 99.8%, and it can treat various types of dyes (Yeow et al., 2021).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Yeow et al., 2021 source
It may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationExcessive exposure to dye causes skin irritation, respiratory problems, and some dyes increase cancer risk in humans.
“Excessive exposure to dye causes skin irritation, respiratory problems and some dyes even increase the risk of cancer in humans (Amirza et al., 2017).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Amirza et al., 2017 source
The Introduction (page not provided) says dyes can cause skin irritation and describes potential carcinogenic effects, including effects on human cells. It does not mention respiratory problems or establish an exposure threshold for these harms; it also frames carcinogenicity as potential rather than a demonstrated increase in human cancer risk. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
Premisecitation0.7-1.6 million tons of dyes are delivered yearly and 10-15% of this volume is disposed of as wastewater, making them major water pollutants.
“To satisfy the modern need, it is assessed that 0.7-1.6 million tons of dyes are delivered yearly and 10-15% of this volume is disposed of as wastewater, making it major water pollutants (Bhatia et al., 2017;Varghese et al., 2019;Syafiuddin and Fulazzaky, 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked- cites Bhatia et al., 2017 source
- cites Varghese et al., 2019 source
- cites Syafiuddin and Fulazzaky, 2020 source
The Introduction (page not supplied) reports approximately 700,000 metric tons of annual dye production and a 10–15% loss of colorants during dyeing. It also describes environmental harm from dyes released into water, but does not give the 1.6-million-ton upper estimate or state that all of the 10–15% loss is disposed of as wastewater. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationReactive dyes are stable and anionic, and display resistance toward light.
“Dyes are usually classified based on their chemical structure, such as anionic, cationic, and nonionic; reactive dyes are stable and anionic, and display resistance toward light (Heidari et al., 2019;Dai et al., 2018).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checkedIt may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationBiotreatment of dye-containing wastewater effluent by fungal cells is cost-effective, easily applicable, eco-friendly, and has no nutrient needs.
“Biotreatment of dyecontaining wastewater effluent by fungal cell was provided a cost-effective, easily applicable, eco-friendly (Salem et al., 2019;(Argumedo-Delira et al., 2021), and absence of nutrient needs (Ghany et al., 2019).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 3 sources checked- cites Salem et al., 2019 source
- cites Argumedo-Delira et al., 2021 source
The Introduction says biological dye-removal methods, including fungal treatments, are less costly than chemical methods and are eco-friendly. It does not establish that fungal-cell treatment is easily applicable. The separate claim about having no nutrient needs is attributed to Ghany et al., not to this source. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Ghany et al., 2019 source
It may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationAlgae are among the most favorable bio-sorbents because they have high biosorption capacity and are easily available in large amounts.
“Algae are considered one of the sources of the most favorable types of bio-sorbents because they have high biosorption capacity and are easily available in large amounts (Singh and Singh, 2017;Azam et al., 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites Singh and Singh, 2017 source
The Biosorption section describes algae as potent biosorbents, citing their availability in fresh and salt water, relatively high surface area, and high binding affinity. It does not establish that algae are easily available in large amounts; availability across habitats is not evidence of quantity. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Azam et al., 2020 source
It may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationAdsorption is a very effective, cheap, and commonly used method among all available dye removal techniques.
“Adsorption is found to be a very effective, cheap, and commonly used method among all available dye removal techniques (Kandisa and Saibaba KV, 2016).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Kandisa and Saibaba KV, 2016 source
It may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationMajor drawbacks of AOPs for dye removal include sludge production in Fenton reagent, formation of toxic byproduct in photocatalyst, and high cost due to expensive reagents and energy consumption.
“Sludge production in the case of Fenton reagent, formation of toxic byproduct in the case of photocatalyst, and high cost due to the use of expensive reagents (for example, H 2 O 2 ) and energy consumption (generation of O 3 or UV radiation) are the major drawback of AOPs for dye removal (Cuerda-Correa et al., 2020;Moosavi et al., 2020).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites Cuerda-Correa et al., 2020 source
The paper identifies Fenton sludge in its Conclusions and states that expensive reagents such as H₂O₂ and energy for ozone or UV make AOPs costly. It also warns that AOPs can produce toxic byproducts, but does not establish this specifically as a drawback of photocatalysis for dye removal; the review focuses on antibiotics in water. The cited passages have no page numbers in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Moosavi et al., 2020 source
Table 1 in the Introduction identifies sludge production as a disadvantage of Fenton reagents, toxic byproduct formation for photocatalysts, and high operational cost for ozonation. It does not attribute AOP costs to H₂O₂, ozone generation, or UV radiation; it instead lists low-cost reagents for Fenton treatment and low operational cost for photocatalysis. (LLM, conf=0.89)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
It may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationPhosphoric acid stimulates bond cleavage in agricultural waste biomass to increase carbon yield and promotes dye biosorption by grafting phosphate functions onto the biomass and enhancing acid functions involved in dye fixation.
“For example, phosphoric acid stimulates bond cleavage in agricultural waste biomass to increase the carbon yield (Bello et al., 2019).Phosphoric acid promoted dye biosorption by grafting phosphate functions onto the biomass and enhancing the acid functions involved in dye fixation (Benabbas et al., 2021).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim. The authors may not put it forward as true. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationRecovery of powder-activated carbons is very costly, time-consuming, and not very efficient, making them unsuitable for industrial applications, and reusability is almost impossible for low-cost products.
“Some authors stated that the recovery step of powder-activated carbons is very costly, time-consuming, and not very efficient so that they are not suitable for industrial applications (Moosavi et al., 2020), and more particularly reusability is almost impossible for low-cost products (Saha et al., 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checkedIt may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationThe pH of the solution affects both the chemistry of the aqueous solution and the binding sites present on the surface of adsorbents.
“The pH of the solution affects both the chemistry of the aqueous solution and the binding sites present on the surface of adsorbents (Kumar et al., 2021).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Kumar et al., 2021 source
It may state two separate claims as one.
Findingnone givenMost fungal species potentially achieved more than 90% removal of a specific dye, except Pleurotus ostreatus, Aspergillus flavus, and Diaporthe schini, which had removal efficiencies of 53%, 53.62%, and 87%, respectively.
“Most species of fungi potentially achieved more than 90% of a specific type of dye except Pleurotus ostreatus, Aspergillus flavus, and Diaporthe schini which had a removal efficiency of 53%, 53.62, and 87%, respectively.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataLangmuir isotherm was fitted by most biosorption studies, indicating that monolayer coverage adsorption was the dominant process.
“Table 4 revealed that Langmuir isotherm was fitted by most biosorption studies, indicating that the monolayer coverage adsorption was the dominant process.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataSpirulina and Chlorella species are common microalgae studied and achieved up to 99% dye removal efficiency.
“Table 4 revealed that Spirulina and Chlorella species are common types of microalgae studied and achieved up to 99% removal efficiency.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataThe pseudo-2nd-order kinetic model showed the best model fit for most biosorption studies.
“Similarly, the pseudo-2 nd -order kinetic model showed the best model fit.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
Findingnone givenSargassum species of macroalgae are commonly studied and can remove more than 90% of dyes.
“Similarly, Sargassum species of macro algae are commonly studied and can remove more than 90% of dyes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Findingown dataThe retrieved publications were adsorbents prepared from different biomasses activated and/or modified with various chemicals or techniques.
“The retrieved publications were found as adsorbents prepared from different biomasses activated and/or modified with various chemicals or techniques.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
FindingcitationMost yeast biosorption studies showed best fit for Langmuir isotherm and pseudo-second-order kinetic models, suggesting dominance of monolayer chemoadsorption, except some yeast species where Freundlich and Temkin isotherm models fit best.
“Table 6 revealed that most studies showed the best fit for Langmuir isotherm and pseudo-second-order kinetic models, suggesting the dominance of monolayer chemoadsorption except some yeast species in which the Freundlich and Temkin isotherm models showed the best fit model.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim.
Findingnone givenEach study reviewed has considered different parameters for efficiency determination.
“Although most biomasses achieved a good removal efficiency, each study reviewed has considered different parameters for efficiency determination.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Findingnone givenAmong available adsorbents, biomass-based treatments are recent materials employed in various sectors to remove dyes and other pollutants.
“Among different available adsorbents, biomass-based treatments are found to be the recent materials employed at various sectors to remove dyes and other pollutants.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingnone givenConventional dye treatment methods have limitations related to operation efficiency, total cost, energy, and generation of toxic by-products, although they have good performances for a particular pollutant.
“The review reveals that the conventional dye treatment methods have some particular limitations related to operation efficiency, total cost, energy, and generation of toxic by-products, although they have good performances to a particular pollutant.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
FindingreasoningMost studies on biomass-based adsorption have been conducted on the laboratory scale using simulated wastewater, so cost analysis of biomass-based adsorbents is limited, particularly for microbial biomass.
“Unfortunately, most studies on biomassbased adsorption have been conducted on the laboratory scale using simulated wastewater, so that the cost analysis of the biomass-based adsorbents is limited, particularly for microbial biomass.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim.
Findingnone givenThe bio-sorption process is affected by environmental parameters such as pH, initial dye concentration, temperature, contact time, and adsorbent dose, as well as the ways of preparation of materials.
“The bio-sorption process is affected by various environmental parameters such as pH, initial dye concentration, temperature, contact time, and adsorbent dose as well as the ways of the preparations of materials.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Findingnone givenMost studies on biomass-based adsorption concentrated on the removal of a single pollutant.
“Most of the studies on biomass-based adsorption concentrated on the removal of a single pollutant”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Interpretationown dataPublication counts from 2017 to 2020 are highly consistently increased, suggesting that nonconventional adsorbents from biomass are recently attracting attention for dye removal.
“As it can be observed, publication counts from 2017 to 2020 are highly consistently increased suggested that the nonconventional adsorbents from biomass are recently attracting attention for dye removal.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationIn low pH solutions, the removal rate of anionic dyes increases while the removal rate of cationic dyes is lower; conversely, high pH increases cationic dye removal and lowers anionic dye removal.
“It has been observed that (Table 3) in low pH solutions, the removal rate of anionic dyes is increased while the removal rate of cationic dyes is lower.Conversely, a high pH solution increases the removal of the cationic dyes and causes a low removal percentage for anionic dyes (Ahmed and Ebrahim, 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ahmed and Ebrahim, 2020
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
It may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationActivated carbon effectively removes dyes from industrial wastewater effluents, but it has constraints including capital cost, energy consumption, and loss of ability after sorption-desorption cycles.
“Dyes from the industrial wastewater effluents are effectively removed by using activated carbon; however, it has some constraints such as capital cost, energy consumption, and loss of its ability after sorption-desorption cycles.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationYeast has favorable applications in treating dye-containing solutions due to high capacity to adsorb and accumulate pollutants, fast growth, faster decolorization than filamentous fungi, and ability to survive unfavorable environments.
“Yeast is a single-celled organism, a member of the kingdom of fungi that have many favorable applications in the treatment of dye-containing solutions due to their high capacity to adsorb and accumulate pollutants, fast growth, faster decolorization than filamentous fungi, and the ability to survive unfavorable environments (Sen et al., 2016).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Sen et al., 2016 source
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
Premisenone givenBioadsorbents may be activated with acid/base (such as HCl, NaOH) and thermal activation, and some are composited with inorganic and/or organic nanomaterials.
“For example, the bioadsorbents may be activated with acid/base (such as HCl, NaOH) and thermal activation, and also some are composited with inorganic and/or organic nanomaterials.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
PremisecitationDyes block sunlight penetration thereby inhibiting photosynthesis.
“It also blocks sunlight penetration thereby inhibiting photosynthesis (Bello et al., 2015;Dey et al., 2017).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedIt may state two separate claims as one.
Premisenone givenSurface chemistry, pH, initial dye concentration, temperature, contact time, adsorbent dose, and preparation methods affect the biosorption process.
“Surface chemistry, pH, initial dye concentration, temperature, contact time, and adsorbent dose as well as the ways of the preparations of materials affect the biosorption process.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one. The quote only partly states this claim.
PremisecitationMagnetically responsive brown algae (Sargassum horneri) had maximum sorption capacity for acridine orange of 193.8 mg/g but lower for malachite green at 110.4 mg/g at 2 h contact time.
“The sorbent had maximum sorption capacity for acridine orange (193.8 mg/g) but lower for malachite green (110.4 mg/ g) at 2 h contact time.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Angelova et al., 2016 source
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Interpretationnone givenDye removal from wastewater using bio-based adsorbents is a promising alternative.
“Dye removal from wastewater using bio-based adsorbents is a promising alternative.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationRemoval of color by coagulation is strongly dependent on structure of dye molecules (chromophores and auxochromes), so structural considerations are important when choosing coagulant.
“The removal of color by coagulation is strongly dependent on the structure of dye molecules (chromophores and auxochromes), so structural considerations of dyes are very important when choosing the most appropriate coagulant for dye removal (Mcyotto et al., 2021).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Mcyotto et al., 2021 source
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
PremisecitationAOPs involve generation of oxidizing species such as hydroxyl radicals and sulfate radicals in sufficient quantity to interact with organic compounds.
“Advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) involve the generation of oxidizing species such as hydroxyl radicals and sulfate radicals in sufficient quantity to interact with the organic compounds of the medium (Wang and Wang, 2020;Duan et al., 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedIt may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationMembrane filtration has advantages including appreciable resistance to temperature, good resistance to adverse chemical environment, and excellent performance of color removal.
“It has some advantages such as appreciable resistance to temperature, good resistance to adverse chemical environment, and excellent performance of color removal (Roy et al., 2018).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Roy et al., 2018 source
It may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationFungal biomasses are composed of sugars, proteins, lipids, and functional groups such as alcohols, carboxyl, and alkanes, which give them properties useful for biosorption in wastewater treatment.
“Fungal biomasses are composed of sugars, proteins, and lipids, and different functional groups (alcohols, carboxyl, and alkanes) which provide it certain properties and applications as a biosorption in treatments of wastewater (Isaza-Pérez et al., 2020;Ahmed and Ebrahim, 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Isaza-Pérez et al., 2020 source
- cites Ahmed and Ebrahim, 2020
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
It may state two separate claims as one.
Premisenone givenSludge generation, extra operational cost for sludge disposal, and high maintenance costs are major challenges in applying chemical precipitation.
“Sludge generation, the extra operational cost for sludge disposal, and high maintenance costs are major challenges in applying this process.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Premisenone givenCoagulation-flocculation is among the most widespread physiochemical processes for removal and destruction of coloring substances in wastewater.
“Coagulation-flocculation is among the most widespread physiochemical processes for the removal and distraction of coloring substances in wastewater.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
PremisecitationAn optimum monolayer uptake capacity of 279.14 mg/g was reported for citric acid-functionalized brown algae modified algal adsorbent.
“An optimum monolayer uptake capacity of 279.14 mg/g was reported for the modified algal adsorbent (Essekri et al., 2021).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Essekri et al., 2021 source
It may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationBacteria have small size, ubiquity, and capability to grow under varying environmental conditions, making them good adsorbents.
“Their small size, ubiquity, and capability to grow under varying environmental conditions make them good adsorbents (Singh et al., 2018).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Singh et al., 2018 source
It may state two separate claims as one.
PremisereasoningAnionic dyes are removed in acidic conditions and cationic dyes such as methylene blue in alkaline conditions.
“Anionic dyes are removed in acidic conditions and cationic dyes (e.g.MB) in alkaline conditions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
PremisecitationThe maximum sorption capacity for basic blue dye by Bacillus catenulatus JB-022 was 139.74 mg/g from the Langmuir adsorption isotherm.
“The maximum sorption capacity for basic blue dye was found to be 139.74mg/g from the Langmuir adsorption isotherm.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kim et al., 2015 source
It may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationDyes released from textile, paper, leather, rubber, cosmetic, and printing industries are major pollutants in wastewater effluent and disturb the aquatic environment.
“Various types of dyes and metal ions are the major pollutants encountered in wastewater effluent, which disturb the aquatic environment (Varghese et al., 2019;Saravanan et al., 2021).Dyes are organic compounds that are released from several industrial sources including textile, paper, leather, rubber, cosmetic, and printing industries (Piaskowski et al., 2018;Katheresan et al., 2018).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedIt may state two separate claims as one.
InterpretationreasoningHigher surface area, higher porosity, and low ash content lead to high adsorption capacity.
“Higher surface area, higher porosity, and low ash content lead to high adsorption capacity.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationAmong steam activation, carbon dioxide activation, and chemical activation, steam activation is the best environmentally and economically viable option, while chemical activation results in highest surface area and porosity.
“Among the above three methods, steam activation is the best environmentally and economically viable option, while chemical activation results in the highest surface area and porosity (Rahimian and Zarinabadi, 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Rahimian and Zarinabadi, 2020
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Premisenone givenApplication of waste organic materials and microbial biomasses is gaining increasing interest as effective, low-cost, and ecologically friendly sorbents.
“The application of waste organic materials (e.g., compounds extracted from peels, leaves, barks) and microbial biomasses (fungus bio-sorbent, bacterial, and green algal biomasses) is gaining an increasing interest being effective, low-cost, and ecologically friendly sorbents.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationMembrane technologies have disadvantages including high cost of disposal of concentrated residue, high management costs, inability to deal with high flow rates, and frequent clogging of membrane pores by dye molecules.
“Also worthy of note are disadvantages, among which the one linked to the high cost of disposal of the remaining concentrated residue following the separation, the high management costs and the inability to deal with high flow rates, and frequent clogging of membrane pores by the dye molecules (Collivignarelli et al., 2019).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Collivignarelli et al., 2019 source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Premisenone givenAdvanced oxidation processes have been effectively investigated in removal of a variety of contaminants from water and wastewater.
“Recently, advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) have been effectively investigated in the removal of a variety of contaminants from water and wastewater.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
PremisereasoningCarboxyl groups have a negative charge at higher pH, resulting in electrostatic binding of cationic dyes.
“The carboxyl groups have a negative charge at a higher pH, which results in electrostatic binding of the cationic dyes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationActivated carbon has remarkable interior area, pore structure, high adsorption capacity, surface reactivity, and low cost compared to inorganic adsorbents such as zeolite.
“Activated carbon (AC) is a commonly used adsorbent that refers to a group of carbon materials with high oscillation and high internal surface which are unique because of their remarkable interior area, pore structure, high adsorption capacity, surface reactivity, and low cost compared to inorganic adsorbents such as zeolite (Hasanzadeh et al., 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hasanzadeh et al., 2020 source
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
InterpretationreasoningAdsorption using nonconventional biomass-based sorbents is the greatest attractive alternative for dye removal because of low cost, sustainability, availability, and eco-friendliness.
“Adsorption using the nonconventional biomass-based sorbents is the greatest attractive alternatives because of their low cost, sustainability, availability, and eco-friendly.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Biomass-based adsorbents are eco-friendly, low-cost, and have good surface characteristics.
It may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationMost conventional treatment methods have limitations including generation of toxic sludge, high operational and maintenance costs, and intricate technique.
“However, the limitations of most of these methods include the generation of toxic sludge, high operational and maintenance costs, and the intricate technique involved in the treatment (Yahiaoui et al., 2021).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Yahiaoui et al., 2021 source
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
PremisecitationAdsorption involves valency forces through sharing or exchange of electrons between adsorbent and dye molecules by covalent forces and ion exchange.
“The adsorption involves valency forces through the sharing or exchange of electrons between the adsorbent and dye molecules by covalent forces and ion exchange (Mohd Nasir et al., 2021).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Mohd Nasir et al., 2021 source
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationActivated carbon is a universal adsorbent for effluent treatment and is commonly used for removal of several pollutants.
“Activated carbon is undoubtedly considered a universal adsorbent for effluent treatment and is commonly used for the remo//val of several pollutants (Rahimian and Zarinabadi, 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Rahimian and Zarinabadi, 2020
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
It may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationElectrocoagulation is successful in removal of organic dyes, fine suspended particles, heavy metals, and oil and grease from diverse industrial effluents.
“The EC process is successful in the removal of organic dyes, fine suspended particles, heavy metals, and oil and grease (or other heavier hydrocarbons) from diverse industrial effluents (Mondal et al., 2018).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Mondal et al., 2018 source
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Premisenone givenAlgae, yeast, bacterial, fungal, agro-waste, and plant debris are potential bioadsorbent sources.
“Algae, yeast, bacterial, fungal, agro-waste, and plant debris are potential bioadsorbent sources.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationWhen pH is greater than pHpzc, cationic dye adsorption is favorable due to functional groups such as OH- and COO-, whereas anionic dye adsorption is favorable at pH less than pHpzc because adsorbent surfaces become positively charged.
“When pH is greater than pH pzc , it is favorable for cationic dye adsorption due to the existence of functional groups (OH -, COO -), whereas anionic dye adsorption is favorable at pH less than pH pzc because the surfaces of adsorbents become positively charged (Zhou et al., 2019).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Zhou et al., 2019 source
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
Interpretationown dataBiomass-based adsorbents are attracting attention and are widely studied.
“Owing to eco-friendly, low cost, and good surface characteristics, biomass-based adsorbents are attracting attention and are widely studied.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Biomass-based adsorbents are eco-friendly, low-cost, and have good surface characteristics.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Premisenone givenThe pore volume of bioadsorbents and the functional groups of dyes are deciding factors in achieving high dye adsorption.
“The pore volume of the bioadsorbents and functional groups of dyes are the deciding factors in achieving high dye adsorption.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationCongo red-loaded java citronella bio-adsorbent and commercial activated carbon showed 90.3% and 83.7% desorption, respectively, and the adsorbents were effective up to two adsorption-desorption cycles.
“They found 90.3 and 83.7% desorption for biomass and commercial AC, respectively, from dye-loaded adsorbents (Saha et al., 2020).Moreover, the adsorbents were effective up to two adsorption-desorption cycles.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Saha et al., 2020 source
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationCommon desorption methods include thermal treatment, acid treatment with H2SO4, HNO3, HCl, H3PO4, or NaOH, organic solvents such as methanol and ethanol, biological methods, and vacuum methods.
“The common desorption methods include thermal treatment, acid (H 2 SO 4 , HNO 3 , HCl, H 3 PO 4 , NaOH) treatment, organic solvents (methanol and ethanol), biological methods, and vacuum methods (Hassan and Carr, 2021).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hassan and Carr, 2021 source
It may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationThe estimated cost of 1 g of adsorbent is ₹4.54, ₹0.91, and ₹0.97 for coconut shell, groundnut shell, and rice husk biochars, respectively, considering operational costs including manufacturing, maintenance, feedstock, transportation, labor, and distribution costs.
“It was estimated that the cost of 1 g of adsorbent is ₹4.54, ₹0.91, and ₹0.97 for Coconut shell, Groundnut shell, and Rice husk, respectively, by considering operational costs including manufacturing costs, maintenance costs, feedstock costs, transportation costs, labor costs, and the distribution costs (Praveen et al., 2021).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Praveen et al., 2021 source
It may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationResidual yeast and diatomaceous earth had dye removal capacities of 8.66 mg/g and 7.96 mg/g, respectively, for Reactive Blue 160 at pH 2.
“They found that the two biosorbents had a dye removal capacity of 8.66 mg/g and 7.96 mg/g respectively at a pH of 2 (Semião et al., 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Semião et al., 2020 source
It may state two separate claims as one.
InterpretationcitationThe cost of bioadsorbents prepared from microbes and forest and agricultural waste is low compared with conventional treatment technologies, although the cited studies did not incorporate cost-benefit analysis.
“Several authors reported that the cost of bioadsorbents prepared from microbes and forest and agricultural waste is low as compared with conventional treatment technologies, although they did not incorporate cost-benefit analysis in their study.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Interpretationnone givenBiomass-derived adsorbents can be used on a large scale because of their huge availability.
“One of the important features for the use of biomass-derived adsorbent for removal of dyes is that it can be used on a large scale because of its huge availability.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationPotato peel biochar is a promising adsorbent for removing Cibacron Blue dye, and its sorption ability follows the order calcined > activated > native materials.
“Potato peel biochar was considered a promising adsorbent for removing Cibacron Blue dye.The sorption ability of this waste follows the order: calcined > activated > native materials (Bouhadjra et al., 2021).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bouhadjra et al., 2021 source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
It may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationBiochar prepared from Korean cabbage, rice straw, and wood chip can be used as an alternative to activated carbon to remove congo red and crystal violet, but Korean cabbage had better adsorption performance than the others.
“Sewu et al. (2017) prepared biochar from Korean cabbage (KC), rice straw, and wood chip and can be used as an alternative to activated carbon to remove congo red and CV (Sewu et al., 2017), but KC had better absorption performance than others.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Sewu et al., 2017 source
It may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationTriethylenetetramine-modified pea peel biochar had adsorption capacity enhanced from 78.18 to 523.12 mg/g at equilibrium, and up to 98% of Acid Orange 7 was removed by the modified biochar while 96% was removed by unmodified biochar.
“The adsorption capacity of the modified biochar was significantly enhanced from 78.18 to 523.12 mg/g at equilibrium.Up to 98% of AO7 was removed by triethylenetetramine-modified biochar, while 96% removal was achieved using unmodified biochar (El-Nemr et al., 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites El-Nemr et al., 2020
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
It may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationGroundnut shell-based biochar had maximum adsorption capacity of 46.3 mg/g and the least cost of ₹0.91 per unit gram for Basic Red 09 dye removal.
“Groundnut shellbased biochar had maximum adsorption capacity (46.3 mg/g) as well as the least cost (₹0.91)per unit gram of Basic Red 09 dye removal.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Praveen et al., 2021 source
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
Interpretationnone givenAmong all adsorbents, biomass-derived adsorbent is preferred because it comparatively has the highest surface area, regardless of activation techniques, depending on source types, resulting in increased adsorption of contaminants.
“Among all the adsorbents, the biomassderived adsorbent is preferred comparatively having the highest surface area, regardless of the activation techniques, depending on source types resulted in increasing the adsorption of the contaminants.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationDesorption after adsorption is important to regenerate and reuse used adsorbents, reduce waste generation, and keep process cost down.
“After the adsorption process is accomplished, the desorption process is of great importance to regenerate and reuse those used adsorbents and to reduce the generation of waste as well as to keep the process price down (Zhou et al., 2019).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Zhou et al., 2019 source
It may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationWatermelon peel biochars had adsorption capacities ranging from 76.94 to 462.18 mg/g at pH 1.0, 3 h contact time, and room temperature, and achieved more than 96% removal of Acid Yellow 11.
“The sorption study revealed that the capacity of prepared watermelon biochars was ranged between 76.94 and 462.18 mg/g at pH of 1.0, contact time of 3 h, and room temperature, and more than 96% removal of AY11 was achieved.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites El Nemr et al., 2020
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
PremisecitationPotential solutions for safely disposing of the final effluent include stabilization and immobilization, for example, using a cement-based system as a binding agent.
“The potential solutions for safely disposing of the final effluent include stabilization and immobilization, for example, using a cement-based system as a binding agent (Dey et al., 2017).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Dey et al., 2017 source
Probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningDifficulties are faced in comparing dye removal techniques.
“Consequently, difficulties are faced in the comparison among them.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationAgricultural and forestry wastes are generally rich in cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin, and their surfaces comprise active groups including hydroxyl, carboxyl, amino, methyl, and others.
“Agricultural and forestry wastes are generally rich in cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin.Its surface comprises several active groups including hydroxyl, carboxyl, amino, carboxyl, methyl, and so on (Zhou et al., 2019).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Zhou et al., 2019 source
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
Interpretationnone givenDistinctive surface chemistry with incorporated functional groups (alcohol, ketones, aldehydes, carboxylic, ether, phenol) gives bio-sorbents high attraction toward dye and makes biomass-based adsorbents effective for dye removal.
“Distinctive surface chemistry with the incorporation of several functional groups (alcohol, ketones, aldehydes, carboxylic, ether, phenol) makes those bio-sorbents with a high attraction toward dye and makes the biomass-based adsorbents effective material for dye removal.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationThe maximum monolayer adsorption capacities of brewer's yeast biomass for methylene blue, malachite green, and safranin O were 212.05, 212.05, and 76.77 mg/g, respectively.
“The maximum monolayer adsorption capacities of BYB for MB, MG, and SO were 212.05, 212.05, and 76.77 mg/g, respectively.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Lin et al., 2019 source
It may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationBiomass-derived adsorbents are commonly cellulose-based structures and can produce good porous carbon that can adsorb various types of contaminants in the natural environment.
“Moreover, the biomass-derived adsorbents are commonly cellulose-based structures and can produce a good porous carbon that can adsorb various types of contaminants in the natural environment.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Sherugar et al., 2022 source
It may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationActivated carbon from Persea Americana achieved 98% removal of basic yellow dye from wastewater and can substitute commercially available adsorbents.
“Activated carbon provided from Persea Americana was suggested for basic yellow dye removal from wastewater with 98% removal.This activated carbon can substitute the commercially available adsorbents (Regti et al., 2017).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Regti et al., 2017 source
The paper relies on this without support.
Biomass-based adsorbents are eco-friendly, low-cost, and have good surface characteristics.
“Owing to eco-friendly, low cost, and good surface characteristics, biomass-based adsorbents are attracting attention and are widely studied.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Commercial activated carbon cost is high for industrial applications.
“Although the removal of dye using CAC is efficient, its cost is high for industrial applications.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Some biomass-based activated carbons prepared at laboratory scale have superior adsorption capacity to commercial activated carbon, but limited information exists on industrial application.
“And some studies reported that the adsorption capacities of some biomass-based activated carbons prepared in the laboratory scale showed superior adsorption capacity than CAC; however, limited information is available on the application of biomass-based activated carbon at the industrial level.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Scaling up and cost analysis is a significant constraint for utilizing biomass-derived adsorbents for dye removal.
“The other most significant constraint for utilizing biomassderived adsorbents for dye removal is the scaling up and cost analysis.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Recovery or regeneration procedures may require a significant amount of energy and solvents depending on the activation processes used.
“In addition, the recovery or regeneration procedure may also need a significant amount of energy and solvents depending on the activation processes used.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Real dye-containing wastewater, such as textile industry wastewater, usually comprises a mixture of many dyes.
“in real dye-containing wastewater, like textile industries that usually comprise a mixture of many dyes.”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Groundnut biochar cost is assigned to two different units
MinorThe paper first gives ₹0.91 as the cost per gram of groundnut-shell adsorbent, then calls it the cost per gram of dye removed. Those cannot be the same unit when one gram of adsorbent has a stated dye-adsorption capacity of only 46.3 mg.
“Groundnut shellbased biochar had maximum adsorption capacity (46.3 mg/g) as well as the least cost (₹0.91)per unit gram of Basic Red 09 dye removal.”
“It was estimated that the cost of 1 g of adsorbent is ₹4.54, ₹0.91, and ₹0.97 for Coconut shell, Groundnut shell, and Rice husk, respectively”
Fungal-removal summary omits Trametes below 90%
MinorThe text lists three fungi as exceptions to its claim of more than 90% removal, but Table 3 also reports 89.47% for Trametes sp. SC-10.
“Most species of fungi potentially achieved more than 90% of a specific type of dye except Pleurotus ostreatus, Aspergillus flavus, and Diaporthe schini which had a removal efficiency of 53%, 53.62, and 87%, respectively.”
“| Trametes sp. | heat-treated | Acid Blue 161 | 221.6 | Langmuir | Avrami | 6 | | 600 | | 89.47 | Puchana-Rosero |”
Citations
Cites
Evaluation of advanced oxidation processes for water and wastewater treatment – A critical review
Miklos, D. B., Remy, C., Jekel, M. R., Linden, K. G., Drewes, J. E., & Hübner, U. (2018) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2018.03.042 · Cited by 3,169
Removal of synthetic dyes from wastewaters: a review
Forgacs, E., Cserháti, T., & Oros, G. (2004) · Environment International · doi:10.1016/j.envint.2004.02.001 · Cited by 3,008
Efficiency of various recent wastewater dye removal methods: A review
Katheresan, V., Kansedo, J., & Lau, S. Y. (2018) · Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.jece.2018.06.060 · Cited by 2,752
Reactive Species in Advanced Oxidation Processes: Formation, Identification and Reaction Mechanism
Wang, J., & Wang, S. (2020) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2020.126158 · Cited by 1,585
Methods for preparation and activation of activated carbon: a review
Heidarinejad, Z., Dehghani, M. H., Heidari, M., Javedan, G., Ali, I., & Sillanpää, M. E. T. (2020) · Environmental Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1007/s10311-019-00955-0 · Cited by 1,480
An overview on engineering the surface area and porosity of biochar
Leng, L., Xiong, Q., Yang, L., Li, H., Zhou, Y., Zhang, W., Jiang, S., Li, H., & Huang, H. (2020) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144204 · Cited by 1,410
Recent advances for dyes removal using novel adsorbents: A review
Zhou, Y., Lu, J., Zhou, Y., & Liu, Y. (2019) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2019.05.072 · Cited by 1,355
The Removal of Colour from Textile Wastewater Using Whole Bacterial Cells: A Review
Pearce, C. (2003) · Dyes and Pigments · doi:10.1016/s0143-7208(03)00064-0 · Cited by 1,297
Ahmad, A., Mohd-Setapar, S. H., Chuong, C. S., Khatoon, A., Wani, W. A., Kumar, R., & Rafatullah, M. (2015) · RSC Advances · doi:10.1039/c4ra16959j · Cited by 1,112
Removal of methylene blue by adsorption onto activated carbon developed from Ficus carica bast
Pathania, D., Sharma, S., & Singh, P. (2017) · Arabian Journal of Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.arabjc.2013.04.021 · Cited by 1,028
Electrodialysis desalination for water and wastewater: A review
Al-Amshawee, S., Yunus, M. Y. B. M., Azoddein, A. A. M., Hassell, D. G., Dakhil, I. H., & Hasan, H. A. (2020) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2019.122231 · Cited by 964
Water Purification by Using Adsorbents: A Review
Singh, N. B., Nagpal, G., Agrawal, S., & Rachna (2018) · Environmental Technology & Innovation · doi:10.1016/j.eti.2018.05.006 · Cited by 962
Biological Methods for Textile Dye Removal from Wastewater: A Review
Bhatia, D., Sharma, N. R., Singh, J., & Kanwar, R. S. (2017) · Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology · doi:10.1080/10643389.2017.1393263 · Cited by 816
Shindhal, T., Rakholiya, P., Varjani, S., Pandey, A., Ngo, H. H., Guo, W., Ng, H. Y., & Taherzadeh, M. J. (2020) · Bioengineered · doi:10.1080/21655979.2020.1863034 · Cited by 733
Singh, K., & Arora, S. (2011) · Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology · doi:10.1080/10643380903218376 · Cited by 689
Advanced Oxidation Processes for the Removal of Antibiotics from Water. An Overview
Cuerda-Correa, E. M., Alexandre-Franco, M. F., & Fernández-González, C. (2019) · Water · doi:10.3390/w12010102 · Cited by 671
Peng, H., & Guo, J. (2020) · Environmental Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1007/s10311-020-01058-x · Cited by 617
Rice husk as a potentially low-cost biosorbent for heavy metal and dye removal: an overview
Chuah, T. G., Jumasiah, A., Azni, I., Katayon, S., & Choong, S. Y. T. (2005) · Desalination · doi:10.1016/j.desal.2004.10.014 · Cited by 607
A Review on Heavy Metal Ions and Dye Adsorption from Water by Agricultural Solid Waste Adsorbents
Afroze, S., & Sen, T. K. (2018) · Water, Air, & Soil Pollution · doi:10.1007/s11270-018-3869-z · Cited by 587
Utilizations of agricultural waste as adsorbent for the removal of contaminants: A review
Dai, Y., Sun, Q., Wang, W., Lu, L., Liu, M., Li, J., Yang, S., Sun, Y., Zhang, K., Xu, J., et al. (2018) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.06.179 · Cited by 549
Dye Sequestration Using Agricultural Wastes as Adsorbents
Adegoke, K. A., & Bello, O. S. (2015) · Water Resources and Industry · doi:10.1016/j.wri.2015.09.002 · Cited by 533
The utilization of leaf-based adsorbents for dyes removal: A review
Bulgariu, L., Escudero, L. B., Bello, O. S., Iqbal, M., Nisar, J., Adegoke, K. A., Alakhras, F., Kornaros, M. E., & Anastopoulos, I. P. (2018) · Journal of Molecular Liquids · doi:10.1016/j.molliq.2018.12.001 · Cited by 481
Application of Efficient Magnetic Particles and Activated Carbon for Dye Removal from Wastewater
Moosavi, S., Lai, C. W., Gan, S., Zamiri, G., Akbarzadeh Pivehzhani, O., & Johan, M. R. (2020) · ACS Omega · doi:10.1021/acsomega.0c01905 · Cited by 458
A review on agro-industrial waste (AIW) derived adsorbents for water and wastewater treatment
Mo, J., Yang, Q., Zhang, N., Zhang, W., Zheng, Y., & Zhang, Z. (2018) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.08.069 · Cited by 457
Enhanced toxic dye removal from wastewater using biodegradable polymeric natural adsorbent
Kubra, K. T., Salman, M. S., & Hasan, M. N. (2021) · Journal of Molecular Liquids · doi:10.1016/j.molliq.2021.115468 · Cited by 441
Water depollution using metal-organic frameworks-catalyzed advanced oxidation processes: A review
Sharma, V. K., & Feng, M. (2017) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.09.043 · Cited by 431
Dye removal by immobilised fungi
Rodríguez Couto, S. (2009) · Biotechnology Advances · doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2008.12.001 · Cited by 395
Dye Removal from Water and Wastewater Using Various Physical, Chemical, and Biological Processes
Piaskowski, K., Świderska-Dąbrowska, R., & Zarzycki, P. K. (2018) · Journal of AOAC INTERNATIONAL · doi:10.5740/jaoacint.18-0051 · Cited by 377
Catalytic Oxidation Process for the Degradation of Synthetic Dyes: An Overview
Javaid, R., & Qazi, U. Y. (2019) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph16112066 · Cited by 371
Effect of Dye Structure on Color Removal Efficiency by Coagulation
Mcyotto, F., Wei, Q., Macharia, D. K., Huang, M., Shen, C., & Chow, C. W. K. (2021) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2020.126674 · Cited by 370
Fungal Decolouration and Degradation of Azo Dyes: A Review
Sen, S. K., Raut, S., Bandyopadhyay, P., & Raut, S. (2016) · Fungal Biology Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.fbr.2016.06.003 · Cited by 361
Detoxification of water and wastewater by advanced oxidation processes
Babu, D. S., Srivastava, V., Nidheesh, P. V., & Kumar, M. (2019) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.133961 · Cited by 352
Abid, M. F., Zablouk, M. A., & Abid-Alameer, A. M. (2012) · Journal of Environmental Health Science and Engineering · doi:10.1186/1735-2746-9-17 · Cited by 351
Application of polyaniline-based adsorbents for dye removal from water and wastewater—a review
Nasar, A., & Mashkoor, F. (2019) · Environmental Science and Pollution Research · doi:10.1007/s11356-018-3990-y · Cited by 341
Treatments for Color Removal from Wastewater: State of the Art
Collivignarelli, M. C., Abbà, A., Carnevale Miino, M., & Damiani, S. (2019) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.11.094 · Cited by 324
Yu, K. L., Lee, X. J., Ong, H. C., Chen, W., Chang, J., Lin, C.-S., Show, P. L., & Ling, T. C. (2020) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115986 · Cited by 313
Alventosa–deLara, E., Barredo-Damas, S., Alcaina–Miranda, M. I., & Iborra–Clar, M. I. (2012) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.01.065 · Cited by 308
Ion-exchange mediated removal of cationic dye-stuffs from water using ammonium phosphomolybdate
Joseph, J., Radhakrishnan, R. C., Johnson, J. K., Joy, S. P., & Thomas, J. (2019) · Materials Chemistry and Physics · doi:10.1016/j.matchemphys.2019.122488 · Cited by 296
Current advancement and future prospect of biosorbents for bioremediation
Singh, S., Kumar, V., Datta, S., Dhanjal, D. S., Sharma, K., Samuel, J., & Singh, J. (2019) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135895 · Cited by 294
Cardoso, N. F., Lima, E. C., Royer, B., Bach, M. V., Dotto, G. L., Pinto, L. A. D. A., & Calvete, T. (2012) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.09.026 · Cited by 278
Highly Efficient Adsorption of Cationic Dye by Biochar Produced with Korean Cabbage Waste
Sewu, D. D., Boakye, P., & Woo, S. H. (2017) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2016.11.009 · Cited by 277
Advanced oxidation processes based on zero-valent aluminium for treating textile wastewater
Khatri, J., Nidheesh, P. V., Anantha Singh, T. S., & Suresh Kumar, M. (2018) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2018.04.074 · Cited by 260
Hasanzadeh, M., Simchi, A., & Shahriyari Far, H. (2020) · Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.jiec.2019.09.031 · Cited by 244
Remediation of Heavy Metals and Dyes from Wastewater Using Cellulose-Based Adsorbents
Varghese, A. G., Paul, S. A., & Latha, M. S. (2019) · Environmental Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1007/s10311-018-00843-z · Cited by 231
Yadav, S., Yadav, A. Y., Bagotia, N., Sharma, A. K., & Kumar, S. (2021) · Journal of Water Process Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.jwpe.2021.102148 · Cited by 222
Treatment of textile wastewater by a hybrid ultrafiltration/electrodialysis process
Lafi, R., Gzara, L., Lajimi, R. H., & Hafiane, A. (2018) · Chemical Engineering and Processing - Process Intensification · doi:10.1016/j.cep.2018.08.010 · Cited by 218
Review on Solvent Desorption Study from Exhausted Adsorbent
Patel, H. (2021) · Journal of Saudi Chemical Society · doi:10.1016/j.jscs.2021.101302 · Cited by 218
Asses, N., Ayed, L., Hkiri, N., & Hamdi, M. (2018) · BioMed Research International · doi:10.1155/2018/3049686 · Cited by 211
Hassan, M. M., & Carr, C. M. (2021) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.129087 · Cited by 208
Limitations and Prospects of Sulfate-Radical Based Advanced Oxidation Processes
Duan, X., Yang, S., Wacławek, S., Fang, G., Xiao, R., & Dionysiou, D. D. (2020) · Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.jece.2020.103849 · Cited by 206
Treatment of tannery wastewater by a hybrid electrocoagulation/electrodialysis process
Deghles, A., & Kurt, U. (2016) · Chemical Engineering and Processing - Process Intensification · doi:10.1016/j.cep.2016.02.009 · Cited by 196
Flotation in Water and Wastewater Treatment
Kyzas, G. Z., & Matis, K. A. (2018) · Processes · doi:10.3390/pr6080116 · Cited by 189
Dye Removal by Adsorption: A Review
Kandisa, R. V., & Saibaba KV, N. (2016) · Journal of Bioremediation & Biodegradation · doi:10.4172/2155-6199.1000371 · Cited by 187
Ribas, M. C., Adebayo, M. A., Prola, L. D. T., Lima, E. C., Cataluña, R., Féris, L. A., Puchana-Rosero, M. J., Machado, F. M., Pavan, F. A., & Calvete, T. (2014) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2014.03.054 · Cited by 183
Bio-removal of Azo Dyes: A Review
Singh, P. K., & Singh, R. L. (2017) · International Journal of Applied Sciences and Biotechnology · doi:10.3126/ijasbt.v5i2.16881 · Cited by 173
Microalgal-based biochar in wastewater remediation: Its synthesis, characterization and applications
Law, X. N., Cheah, W. Y., Chew, K. W., Ibrahim, M. F., Park, Y.-K., Ho, S.-H., & Show, P. L. (2022) · Environmental Research · doi:10.1016/j.envres.2021.111966 · Cited by 168
Tan, L., He, M., Song, L., Fu, X., & Shi, S. (2015) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2015.12.058 · Cited by 165
da Rosa, A. L. D., Carissimi, É., Dotto, G. L., Sander, H., & Féris, L. A. (2018) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.128 · Cited by 163
Techno-economic feasibility of biochar as biosorbent for basic dye sequestration
Praveen, S., Gokulan, R., Pushpa, T. B., & Jegan, J. (2021) · Journal of the Indian Chemical Society · doi:10.1016/j.jics.2021.100107 · Cited by 163
Mishra, S., & Maiti, A. (2018) · Environmental Science and Pollution Research · doi:10.1007/s11356-018-1273-2 · Cited by 162
Streit, A. F. M., Côrtes, L. N., Druzian, S. P., Godinho, M., Collazzo, G. C., Perondi, D., & Dotto, G. L. (2019) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.027 · Cited by 159
Sen, T. K. (2013) · Journal of Chemical and Process Engineering · doi:10.17303/jce.2014.105 · Cited by 158
Copper loaded on activated carbon as an efficient adsorbent for removal of methylene blue
Shu, J., Cheng, S., Xia, H., Zhang, L., Peng, J., Li, C., & Zhang, S. (2017) · RSC Advances · doi:10.1039/c7ra00287d · Cited by 158
Various flotation techniques for metal ions removal
Deliyanni, E. A., Kyzas, G. Z., & Matis, K. A. (2016) · Journal of Molecular Liquids · doi:10.1016/j.molliq.2016.11.069 · Cited by 152
Chen, X., Cui, J., Xu, X., Sun, B., Zhang, L., Dong, W., Chen, C., & Sun, D. (2019) · Carbohydrate Polymers · doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.115512 · Cited by 152
Shokry, H., Elkady, M. F., & Hamad, H. A. F. (2019) · Journal of Materials Research and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.jmrt.2019.07.061 · Cited by 140
Thermal conversion of pineapple crown leaf waste to magnetized activated carbon for dye removal
Astuti, W., Sulistyaningsih, T., Kusumastuti, E., Thomas, G. Y. R. S., & Kusnadi, R. Y. (2019) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2019.121426 · Cited by 138
Sarvajith, M., Reddy, G. K. K., & Nancharaiah, Y. V. (2018) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.08.064 · Cited by 131
Jia, Y., Ding, L., Ren, P., Zhong, M., Ma, J., & Fan, X. (2020) · Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data · doi:10.1021/acs.jced.9b00951 · Cited by 131
Dyes and their removal technologies from wastewater: A critical review
Roy, M., & Saha, R. (2021) · Intelligent Environmental Data Monitoring for Pollution Management · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-819671-7.00006-3 · Cited by 129
Jawad, A. H., Hum, N. N. M. F., Abdulhameed, A. S., & Ishak, M. A. M. (2020) · International Journal of Environmental & Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1080/03067319.2020.1807529 · Cited by 128
Saravanan, A., Kumar, P. S., Govarthanan, M., George, C. S., Vaishnavi, S., Moulishwaran, B., Kumar, S. P., Jeevanantham, S., & Yaashikaa, P. R. (2021) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.129226 · Cited by 128
Sherugar, P., Padaki, M., Naik, N. S., George, S. D., & Murthy, D. H. K. (2022) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.132085 · Cited by 128
Oil Palm Biomass–Based Adsorbents for the Removal of Water Pollutants—A Review
Ahmad, T., Rafatullah, M., Ghazali, A., Sulaiman, O., & Hashim, R. (2011) · Journal of Environmental Science and Health Part C · doi:10.1080/10590501.2011.601847 · Cited by 118
Multi-parametric adsorption effects of the reactive dye removal with commercial activated carbons
Giannakoudakis, D. A., Kyzas, G. Z., Avranas, A., & Lazaridis, N. K. (2015) · Journal of Molecular Liquids · doi:10.1016/j.molliq.2015.07.010 · Cited by 117
Microwave-accelerated sorption of cationic dyes onto green marine algal biomass
Elgarahy, A. M., Elwakeel, K. Z., El-Shoubaky, G. A., & Mohammad, S. H. (2019) · Environmental Science and Pollution Research · doi:10.1007/s11356-019-05417-2 · Cited by 117
Functionalized Locust Bean Pod (Parkia Biglobosa) Activated Carbon for Rhodamine B Dye Removal
Bello, O. S., Adegoke, K. A., Sarumi, O. O., & Lameed, O. S. (2019) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02323 · Cited by 117
Azo dye decolorization by a halotolerant consortium under microaerophilic conditions
Guo, G., Li, X., Tian, F., Liu, T., Yang, F., Ding, K., Liu, C., Chen, J., & Wang, C. (2019) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.125510 · Cited by 110
Decolorization and removal of toxicity of textile azo dyes using fungal biomass pelletized
de Almeida, É. J. R., & Corso, C. R. (2018) · International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology · doi:10.1007/s13762-018-1728-5 · Cited by 109
Mahmoud, M. S., Mostafa, M. K., Mohamed, S. A., Sobhy, N. A., & Nasr, M. (2016) · Journal of environmental chemical engineering · doi:10.1016/j.jece.2016.12.030 · Cited by 105
Biological decolourisation of simulated azo dye in aqueous phase by algae Spirogyra species
Mohan, S. V., Bhaskar, Y. V., & Karthikeyan, J. (2004) · International Journal of Environment and Pollution · doi:10.1504/ijep.2004.004190 · Cited by 104
Bacteria encapsulated electrospun nanofibrous webs for remediation of methylene blue dye in water
Sarıoğlu, Ö. F., Keskin, N. O. S., Çelebioğlu, A., Tekinay, T., & Uyar, T. (2017) · Colloids and Surfaces B Biointerfaces · doi:10.1016/j.colsurfb.2017.01.034 · Cited by 103
Shen, C., Pan, Y., Wu, D., Liu, Y., Ma, C., Li, F., Ma, H., & Zhang, Y. (2019) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2019.05.203 · Cited by 102
Mahmoud, M. S. (2014) · HBRC Journal · doi:10.1016/j.hbrcj.2014.07.005 · Cited by 99
Magnetically Modified Sargassum Horneri Biomass as an Adsorbent for Organic Dye Removal
Angelova, R., Baldikova, E., Pospiskova, K., Maderova, Z., Safarikova, M., & Safarik, I. (2016) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.068 · Cited by 99
Przystaś, W., Zabłocka-Godlewska, E., & Grabińska-Sota, E. (2018) · Brazilian Journal of Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.bjm.2017.06.010 · Cited by 99
Regeneration of Chitosan-Based Adsorbents for Eliminating Dyes from Aqueous Solutions
Vakili, M., Deng, S., Shen, L., Shan, D., Liu, D., & Yu, G. (2019) · Separation & Purification Reviews · doi:10.1080/15422119.2017.1406860 · Cited by 97
Essekri, A., Hsini, A., Naciri, Y., Laabd, M., Ajmal, Z., El Ouardi, M., Ait Addi, A., & Albourine, A. (2021) · International Journal of Phytoremediation · doi:10.1080/15226514.2020.1813686 · Cited by 94
Removal of BB9 textile dye by biological, physical, chemical, and electrochemical treatments
Terrones, Y. A. B., Hermosillo-Nevárez, J. J., Ramírez‐Pereda, B., Vaca, M., Rangel‐Peraza, J. G., Terrones, V. B., & Rojas-Valencia, M. N. (2021) · Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers · doi:10.1016/j.jtice.2021.03.041 · Cited by 92
Uğurlu, M., Gürses, A., & Açıkyıldız, M. (2007) · Microporous and Mesoporous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.micromeso.2007.07.034 · Cited by 91
Bayramoğlu, G., & Arica, M. Y. (2018) · Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering · doi:10.1007/s11814-018-0033-9 · Cited by 91
Central composite design optimization of Acid Blue 25 dye biosorption using shrimp shell biomass
Kousha, M., Tavakoli, S., Daneshvar, E., Vazirzadeh, A., & Bhatnagar, A. (2015) · Journal of Molecular Liquids · doi:10.1016/j.molliq.2015.03.046 · Cited by 90
Biodecolorization of Textile Dye Effluent by Biosorption on Fungal Biomass Materials
Kabbout, R., & Taha, S. (2014) · Physics Procedia · doi:10.1016/j.phpro.2014.07.063 · Cited by 88
Insight into removal kinetic and mechanisms of anionic dye by calcined clay materials and lime
Vimonses, V., Jin, B., & Chow, C. W. K. (2009) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.12.049 · Cited by 87
Dye Adsorption Using Biomass Wastes and Natural Adsorbents: Overview and Future Prospects
Bello, O. S., Adegoke, K. A., Olaniyan, A. A., & Abdulazeez, H. (2015) · Desalination and Water Treatment · doi:10.1080/19443994.2013.862028 · Cited by 86
Batool, A., & Valiyaveettil, S. (2021) · Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.jece.2020.104902 · Cited by 85
Nanofiltration process on dye removal from simulated textile wastewater
Hassani, A. H., Mirzayee, R., Nasseri, S., Borghei, M., Gholami, M., & Torabifar, B. (2008) · International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology · doi:10.1007/bf03326035 · Cited by 82
Al‐Zoubi, H., Ibrahim, K. A., & Abu-Sbeih, K. A. (2015) · Journal of Water Process Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.jwpe.2015.08.002 · Cited by 81
Removal of Synthetic Dye by Chlorella Vulgaris Microalgae as Natural Adsorbent
Chin, J. Y., Chng, L. M., Leong, S. S., Yeap, S. P., Yasin, N. H. M., & Toh, P. Y. (2020) · Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering · doi:10.1007/s13369-020-04557-9 · Cited by 80
Aragaw, T. A., & Angerasa, F. T. (2020) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04975 · Cited by 80
Self-citationOptimization and mechanisms analysis of indigo dye removal using continuous electrocoagulation
Hendaoui, K., Trabelsi‐Ayadi, M., & Ayari, F. (2020) · Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.cjche.2020.07.065 · Cited by 78
Bioremoval of Malachite green from Water Sample by Forestry Waste Mixture as Potential Biosorbent
Deniz, F., & Kepekci, R. A. (2017) · Microchemical Journal · doi:10.1016/j.microc.2017.01.015 · Cited by 69
Kim, S. Y., Jin, M. R., Chung, C. H., Yun, Y.-S., Jahng, K. Y., & Yu, K.-Y. (2015) · Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering · doi:10.1016/j.jbiosc.2014.09.022 · Cited by 68
Removal of the Acid Orange 10 by ion exchange and microbiological methods
Marin, N. M., Pascu, L. F., Demba, A., Lazar, M. N., Badea, I. A., & Aboul‐Enein, H. Y. (2018) · International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology · doi:10.1007/s13762-018-2164-2 · Cited by 68
Ahmad, M. A., Afandi, N. S., & Bello, O. S. (2015) · Applied Water Science · doi:10.1007/s13201-015-0284-0 · Cited by 67
Nguyen, T. A., Fu, C., & Juang, R. (2016) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.07.083 · Cited by 67
Titchou, F. E., Zazou, H., Afanga, H., Gaayda, J. E., Akbour, R. A., Hamdani, M., & Oturan, M. A. (2021) · Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.jelechem.2021.115560 · Cited by 67
Bankole, P. O., Adekunle, A. A., Obidi, O. F., Olukanni, O. D., & Govindwar, S. P. (2017) · Journal of environmental chemical engineering · doi:10.1016/j.jece.2017.08.050 · Cited by 65
Guarín, J. R., Moreno‐Piraján, J. C., & Giraldo, L. (2018) · Journal of Chemistry · doi:10.1155/2018/2124845 · Cited by 64
Heidari, M. R., Varma, R. S., Ahmadian, M., Pourkhosravani, M., Asadzadeh, S. N., Karimi, P., & Khatami, M. (2019) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app9050963 · Cited by 63
Bacterial cellulose derived paper-like purifier with multifunctionality for water decontamination
Hu, Y. C., Liu, F., Sun, Y., Xu, X., Chen, X. D., Pan, B., Sun, D., & Qian, J. (2019) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2019.04.091 · Cited by 63
Removal of Neutral Red Dye via Electro-Fenton Process: A Response Surface Methodology Modeling
Ebratkhahan, M., Naghash‐Hamed, S., Zarei, M., Jafarizad, A., & Rostamizadeh, M. (2021) · Electrocatalysis · doi:10.1007/s12678-021-00640-3 · Cited by 61
Aragaw, T. A. (2020) · Surfaces and Interfaces · doi:10.1016/j.surfin.2020.100439 · Cited by 60
Self-citationFungal biomass as biosorbent for the removal of Acid Blue 161 dye in aqueous solution
Puchana-Rosero, M. J., Lima, E. C., Ortiz-Monsalve, S., Mella, B., da Costa, D., Poll, E. R., & Gutterres, M. (2016) · Environmental Science and Pollution Research · doi:10.1007/s11356-016-8153-4 · Cited by 59
Brackish water recovery from reactive dyeing wastewater via ultrafiltration
Erkanlı, M., Yılmaz, L., Çulfaz-Emecen, P. Z., & Yetış, Ü. (2017) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.195 · Cited by 59
Malachite green adsorption onto modified pine cone: Isotherms, kinetics and thermodynamics mechanism
KAVCI, E. (2020) · Chemical Engineering Communications · doi:10.1080/00986445.2020.1715961 · Cited by 59
Bioaugmentation of floating treatment wetlands for the remediation of textile effluent
Tara, N., Iqbal, M., Khan, Q. M., & Afzal, M. (2018) · Water and Environment Journal · doi:10.1111/wej.12383 · Cited by 57
El-Nemr, M. A., Abdelmonem, N., Ismail, I., Ragab, S., & Nemr, A. E. (2020) · Desalination and Water Treatment · doi:10.5004/dwt.2020.26190 · Cited by 55
Corncob-derived Activated Carbon for Efficiently Adsorption Dye in Sewage
Sun, Z., Qu, K., Yang, C., You, Y., Huang, Z., Umar, A., Ibrahim, Y., Algadi, H., Castañeda, L., Sección de Estudios de Posgrado e Investigación de la Escuela Superior dEMedicina, I. P. N., et al. (2021) · ES Food & Agroforestry · doi:10.30919/esfaf473 · Cited by 55
Seyedi, Z. S., Zahraei, Z., & Jookar Kashi, F. (2020) · Current Microbiology · doi:10.1007/s00284-020-02039-7 · Cited by 54
Dil, E. A., Ghaedi, M., Ghezelbash, G. R., & Asfaram, A. (2017) · Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety · doi:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2017.01.030 · Cited by 53
Biosorption of anionic textile dyes from aqueous solution by yeast slurry from brewery
de Castro, K. C., Cossolin, A. S., dos Reis, H. C. O., & de Morais, E. B. (2017) · Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology · doi:10.1590/1678-4324-2017160101 · Cited by 52
Biopolymers for dye removal via foam separation
Groß, M., Lima, M. T., Uhlig, M., Ebraheme, A., Roeber, O., Olschewski, B., von Klitzing, R., Schomäcker, R., & Schwarze, M. (2017) · Separation and Purification Technology · doi:10.1016/j.seppur.2017.07.025 · Cited by 51
Nasuha, N., Hameed, B. H., & Okoye, P. U. (2020) · Journal of environmental chemical engineering · doi:10.1016/j.jece.2020.104831 · Cited by 51
Syafiuddin, A., & Fulazzaky, M. A. (2021) · Biotechnology Reports · doi:10.1016/j.btre.2020.e00573 · Cited by 51
Moghazy, R. M., Labena, A., Husien, S., Mansor, E. S., & Abdelhamid, A. E.-S. (2020) · International Journal of Biological Macromolecules · doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.04.165 · Cited by 50
Trichoderma Biomass as an Alternative for Removal of congo Red and Malachite green Industrial Dyes
Argumedo-Delira, R., Gómez-Martínez, M. J., & Uribe-Kaffure, R. (2021) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app11010448 · Cited by 50
Hannachi, Y., & Hafidh, A. (2020) · International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology · doi:10.1007/s13762-020-02742-9 · Cited by 49
Enhancing Removal Efficiency of Anionic Dye (Cibacron Blue) Using Waste Potato Peels Powder
Bouhadjra, K., Lemlikchi, W., Ferhati, A., & Mignard, S. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-79069-5 · Cited by 49
Efficient removal of Indigo Carmine dye by a separation process
Căprărescu, S., Miron, A. R., Purcar, V., Radu, A., Sârbu, A., Ion‐Ebrasu, D., Atanase, L. I., & Ghiurea, M. (2016) · Water Science & Technology · doi:10.2166/wst.2016.388 · Cited by 48
Sarıoğlu, Ö. F., Keskin, N. O. S., Çelebioğlu, A., Tekinay, T., & Uyar, T. (2017) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.06.020 · Cited by 48
Azam, R., Kothari, R., Singh, H. M., Ahmad, S., Ashokkumar, V., & Tyagi, V. V. (2020) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123116 · Cited by 48
Advances in Dye Removal Technologies
Mondal, S., Purkait, M. K., & De, S. (2018) · Green Chemistry and Sustainable Technology · doi:10.1007/978-981-10-6293-3 · Cited by 46
Cationic Dyes Removal Using Low-Cost Banana Peel BiosorbentPreprint
Dahiru, M., Zango, Z. U., & Haruna, M. A. (2018) · SSRN Electronic Journal · Cited by 46
Rahimiyan, R., & Zarinabadi, S. (2020) · Progress in Chemical and Biochemical Research · doi:10.33945/sami/pcbr.2020.3.8 · Cited by 46
Acid blue 9 desalting using electrodialysis
Xue, C., Chen, Q., Liu, Y.-Y., Yang, Y., Xu, D., Xue, L., & Zhang, W. (2015) · Journal of Membrane Science · doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2015.06.027 · Cited by 45
Semião, M. A., Haminiuk, C. W. I., & Maciel, G. M. (2020) · Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.jece.2019.103617 · Cited by 45
Feasibility of naphthol green-B dye adsorption using microalgae: thermodynamic and kinetic analysis
Gunasundari, E., Kumar, P. S., Rajamohan, N., & Parthasarathy, V. (2020) · Desalination and Water Treatment · doi:10.5004/dwt.2020.25777 · Cited by 45
Schimmel, D., Fagnani, K. C., Santos, J. B. O., de Barros, M. A. S. D., & da Silva, E. A. (2010) · Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering · doi:10.1590/s0104-66322010000200007 · Cited by 44
Januário, E. F. D., Vidovix, T. B., Araújo, L. A. D., Bergamasco Beltran, L., Bergamasco, R., & Vieira, A. M. S. (2022) · Environmental Technology · doi:10.1080/09593330.2021.1946601 · Cited by 44
Removal of Azo and Anthraquinone Dye by Plant Biomass as Adsorbent - A Review
(2020) · Biointerface Research in Applied Chemistry · doi:10.33263/briac111.82188232 · Cited by 44
Hu, N., Zhang, K., Zhao, Y., Zhang, Z., & Li, H. (2020) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122121 · Cited by 43
Removal of Acid Yellow 11 dye using a novel modified biochar derived from watermelon peels
El-Nemr, M. A., Abdelmonem, N., Ismail, I., Ragab, S., & Nemr, A. E. (2020) · Desalination and Water Treatment · doi:10.5004/dwt.2020.26207 · Cited by 42
Complexation of an Azo Dye by Cyclodextrins: A Potential Strategy for Water Purification
Saifi, A., Joseph, J. P., Singh, A. P., Pal, A., & Kumar, K. (2021) · ACS Omega · doi:10.1021/acsomega.0c05684 · Cited by 41
Keskin, N. O. S., Çelebioğlu, A., Sarıoğlu, Ö. F., Özkan, A. D., Uyar, T., & Tekinay, T. (2015) · RSC Advances · doi:10.1039/c5ra15601g · Cited by 40
Hisada, M., Tomizawa, Y., & Kawase, Y. (2019) · Journal of environmental chemical engineering · doi:10.1016/j.jece.2019.103157 · Cited by 38
Potential of Residual Fungal Biomass: a Review
Isaza-Pérez, F., Ramírez-Carmona, M., Rendón-Castrillón, L., & Ocampo-López, C. (2020) · Environmental Science and Pollution Research · doi:10.1007/s11356-020-08193-6 · Cited by 38
Preparing Agricultural Residue Based Adsorbents for Removal of Dyes from Effluents - A Review
Kharat, D. S. (2015) · Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering · doi:10.1590/0104-6632.20150321s00003020 · Cited by 37
Nouri, H., Azin, E., Kamyabi, A., & Moghimi, H. (2020) · International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology · doi:10.1007/s13762-020-03011-5 · Cited by 37
Bayramoğlu, G., & Yılmaz, M. (2018) · Fibers and Polymers · doi:10.1007/s12221-018-7875-y · Cited by 36
Biosorption of crystal violet dye using inactive biomass of the fungus Diaporthe schini
Grassi, P., dos Reis, C. M., Drumm, F. C., Georgin, J., Tonato, D., Escudero, L. B., Kuhn, R. C., Jahn, S. L., & Dotto, G. L. (2019) · Water Science & Technology · doi:10.2166/wst.2019.091 · Cited by 36
Gül, Ü. D. (2013) · Water SA · doi:10.4314/wsa.v39i5.2 · Cited by 35
Physicochemical study of dye removal using electro-coagulation-flotation process
El-Hosiny, F. I., Abdel‐Khalek, N. A., Selim, K. A., & Osama, I. (2018) · Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu · doi:10.5277/ppmp1825 · Cited by 35
Saha, A., Basak, B. B., & Ponnuchamy, M. (2020) · Separation Science and Technology · doi:10.1080/01496395.2019.1620277 · Cited by 35
Sindelar, F. W., Silva, L. F. O., Machado, V. R., dos Santos, L. C. M., & Stülp, S. (2014) · Separation Science and Technology · doi:10.1080/01496395.2014.947519 · Cited by 34
Yang, Z., Hou, J., Miao, L., & Wu, J. F. (2020) · Environmental Science and Pollution Research · doi:10.1007/s11356-020-11470-z · Cited by 34
Elbatea, A. A., Nosier, S. A., Zatout, A. A., Hassan, I., Sedahmed, G. H., Abdel-Aziz, M. H., & El-Naggar, M. A. (2021) · Journal of Water Process Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.jwpe.2021.102042 · Cited by 34
Dey, M. D., Das, S., Kumar, R., Doley, R., Bhattacharya, S. S., & Mukhopadhyay, R. (2017) · Ecological Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.ecoleng.2017.05.034 · Cited by 33
Zabłocka-Godlewska, E., Przystaś, W., & Grabińska-Sota, E. (2018) · Water Air & Soil Pollution · doi:10.1007/s11270-018-3829-7 · Cited by 32
Öztürk, A., Bayol, E., & Abdullah, M. I. (2020) · Electronic Journal of Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.ejbt.2020.05.002 · Cited by 31
Application of Agricultural Wastes Activated Carbon for Dye Removal - an Overview
Amirza, M. A. R., Adib, M. M. R., & Hamdan, R. (2017) · MATEC Web of Conferences · doi:10.1051/matecconf/201710306013 · Cited by 29
Gül, Ü. D., Taştan, B. E., & Bayazıt, G. (2019) · South African Journal of Botany · doi:10.1016/j.sajb.2019.08.047 · Cited by 28
Drumm, F. C., Grassi, P., Georgin, J., Tonato, D., Franco, D. S. P., Neto, J. R. C., Mazutti, M. A., Jahn, S. L., & Dotto, G. L. (2019) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.06.169 · Cited by 27
Yahiaoui, C., Kameche, M., Innocent, C., & Khenifi, A. (2021) · Chemical Engineering Communications · doi:10.1080/00986445.2020.1721479 · Cited by 26
Biosorption of reactive dyes from aqueous media using the Bacillus sp. residual biomass
Horciu, I.-L., Blaga, A. C., Rusu, L., Zaharia, C., & Șuteu, D. (2020) · Desalination and Water Treatment · doi:10.5004/dwt.2020.25901 · Cited by 26
Regti, A., Laamari, M. R., Stiriba, S.-E., & El Haddad, M. (2017) · Journal of the Association of Arab Universities for Basic and Applied Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.jaubas.2017.01.003 · Cited by 25
Comparison of efficiency for monoazo dye removal by different species of white-rot fungi
Pecková, V., Legerská, B., Chmelová, D., Horník, M., & Ondrejovič, M. (2020) · International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology · doi:10.1007/s13762-020-02806-w · Cited by 24
Hasyimah, N., Furusawa, G., & Amirul, A. A. (2020) · International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology · doi:10.1007/s13762-020-02918-3 · Cited by 24
Dye Removal Using Microbial Biosorbents
Roy, U., Manna, S., Sengupta, S., Das, P., Datta, S., Mukhopadhyay, A., & Bhowal, A. (2018) · Environmental Chemistry for a Sustainable World · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-92162-4_8 · Cited by 23
Siddiqui, S. I., Fatima, B., Tara, N., Rathi, G., & Chaudhry, S. A. (2019) · The Impact and Prospects of Green Chemistry for Textile Technology · doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-102491-1.00015-0 · Cited by 23
Sulyman, M. O., & Gierak, A. (2020) · Acta Scientific Agriculture · doi:10.31080/asag.2020.04.green-environmental-approach-for-adsorption-of-hazardous-dye-from-water-using-tree-and-sea-plant-leaves-dead-l · Cited by 23
Mahmoudi, N., Farhadian, M., Nazar, A. R. S., Eskandari, P., & Esfahani, K. N. (2021) · International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology · doi:10.1007/s13762-021-03296-0 · Cited by 23
BIOREMEDIATION OF XENOBIOTICS: USE OF DEAD FUNGAL BIOMASS AS BIOSORBENT
., M. T. (2014) · International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology · doi:10.15623/ijret.2014.0301094 · Cited by 22
BIOSORPTION, ISOTHERM AND KINETIC PROPERTIES OF COMMON TEXTILE DYE BY PHORMIDIUM ANIMALE
Bayazit, G., Tastan, B. E., & Gul, U. D. (2019) · Global NEST Journal · doi:10.30955/gnj.002984 · Cited by 22
Chen, S. H., Cheow, Y. L., Ng, S. L., & Ting, A. S. Y. (2019) · Separation Science and Technology · doi:10.1080/01496395.2019.1626422 · Cited by 21
Removal Methods of Synthetic Dyes from Industrial Wastewater: A review
Mokif, L. A. (2019) · Mesopotamia Environmental Journal · Cited by 21
Biosorption: the Removal of Toxic Dyes from Industrial Effluent Using Phytobiomass- a Review
Kumar, A., Singh, R., Kumar Upadhyay Sanjay Kumar, S., & Charaya, M. U. (2021) · PLANT ARCHIVES · doi:10.51470/plantarchives.2021.v21.s1.207 · Cited by 21
Removal of methylene blue dye using immobilized bacillus subtilis in batch & column reactor
Upendar, G., Dutta, S., Chakraborty, J., & Bhattacharyya, P. (2016) · Materials Today Proceedings · doi:10.1016/j.matpr.2016.10.029 · Cited by 20
Canizo, B. V., Agostini, E., Oller, A. L. W., Dotto, G. L., Vega, I. A., & Escudero, L. B. (2019) · Water Air & Soil Pollution · doi:10.1007/s11270-019-4235-5 · Cited by 20
Karthik, V., Kumar, P. S., Vardhan, K. H., Saravanan, K., & Nithyakala, N. (2020) · International Journal of Environmental & Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1080/03067319.2020.1787400 · Cited by 20
Mohd Nasir, M. Z., Indiran, G., & Ahmad Zaini, M. A. (2021) · Particulate Science and Technology · doi:10.1080/02726351.2020.1775738 · Cited by 19
Debaryomyces Hansenii F39A as Biosorbent for Textile Dye Removal
Ruscasso, F., Bezus, B., Garmendia, G., Vero, S., Curutchet, G., Cavello, I., & Cavalitto, S. (2021) · Revista Argentina de Microbiología · doi:10.1016/j.ram.2020.10.004 · Cited by 18
Ghariani, B., Hadrich, B., Louati, I., Mtibaà, R., Daâssi, D., Rodríguez‐Couto, S., Nasri, M., & Mechichi, T. (2019) · Journal of Porous Materials · doi:10.1007/s10934-019-00746-6 · Cited by 15
Biological Decolorization of Azo Dyes from Textile Wastewater Effluent by Aspergillus niger
Salem, S., Fouda, A., Mohamed, A., El-Gamal, M., & Talat, M. (2019) · Egyptian Journal of Chemistry · doi:10.21608/ejchem.2019.11720.1747 · Cited by 15
Removal of Remazol Black B dye using bacterial cellulose as an adsorbent
Leal, A. N. R., de Lima, A. D. C. A., Azevedo, M. G. F. D. A., Santos, D. K. D. D. N., Zaidan, L. E. M. C., de Lima, V. F., & Filho, I. J. D. C. (2021) · Scientia Plena · doi:10.14808/sci.plena.2021.034201 · Cited by 15
The action of yeast as an adsorbent in wastewater treatment: A Brief Review
Al-Najar, J. A., Lutfee, T., & Alwan, N. (2021) · IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science · doi:10.1088/1755-1315/779/1/012054 · Cited by 15
Removal of Methylene blue from saline solutions by adsorption and electrodialysis
Lafi, R., Mabrouk, W., & Hafiane, A. (2019) · Membrane Water Treatment · doi:10.12989/mwt.2019.10.2.139 · Cited by 14
Methylene Blue Adsorption Isotherm on Spirulina sp. Microalgae Biomass Coated by Silica-Magnetite
Kausar, R. A., Buhani, B., & Suharso, S. (2020) · IOP Conference Series Materials Science and Engineering · doi:10.1088/1757-899x/857/1/012019 · Cited by 14
Removal of methylene blue dye using low cost adsorbent.
Simi, A., & Azeeza, V. (2010) · Asian Journal of Chemistry · Cited by 13
Dead Biomass of Thermophilic Aspergillus fumigatus for Congo Red Biosorption
Ghany, T., Abboud, M., Alawlaqi, M., & Shater, A. (2019) · THE EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BIOLOGY (Botany) · doi:10.5455/egyjebb.20181206084342 · Cited by 13
Ahmed, H. A. B., & Ebrahim, S. E. (2024) · Journal of Advanced Research in Fluid Mechanics and Thermal Sciences · Cited by 12
Benabbas, K., Zabat, N., & Hocini, I. (2021) · Euro-Mediterranean Journal for Environmental Integration · doi:10.1007/s41207-021-00265-4 · Cited by 11
A Designed Electro-flotation Cell for Dye Removal from Wastewater
El-Hosiny, F. I., AbdelKhalek, M. A., Selim, K. A., & Osama, I. (2017) · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · doi:10.22105/jarie.2017.100801.1021 · Cited by 8
Removal Potential of Basic Dyes and Lead from Water by Brewer's Yeast Biomass
Lin, H.-H., Stephen Inbaraj, B., & Kao, T.-H. (2019) · Journal of the American Society of Brewing Chemists · doi:10.1080/03610470.2018.1561794 · Cited by 5
Treatment of textile wastewater using biochar produced from agricultural waste
Sivaranjanee, R., & Kumar, P. S. (2021) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-323-85829-8.00004-3 · Cited by 5
Adsorption Characteristics of Methylene Blue on PAA-PSBF Adsorbent
Kang, S. B., Wang, Z., & Won, S. W. (2020) · Chemical engineering transactions · doi:10.3303/cet2078035 · Cited by 2
Eslami (2016) · doi:10.22102/jaehr.2017.46690
Flagged first, then by citations
2 of the 199 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- Ahmad, Oil Palm Biomass-Based Adsorbents for the Removal of Water Pollutants-A Review, J. Environ. Sci. Health Part C, 29, 177, 10.1080/10590501.2011.601847 · DOI
- Amreen, 2020, Fast and Efficient Elimination of Malachite Green Dye by Activated Carbon Derived from Fresh Water Micro Algae : Kinetics and Thermodynamic Studies, 2581
- Gnanadoss, 2013, Bioremediation of Textile Dye Using White Rot Fungi: a Review, Rev. Int. J. Cur Res. Rev., 5, 1
- Gowtham, 2021, Experimental Study on Performance Assessment of Fenton and Photo- Fenton Oxidation Process for Methylene Blue, Proc. Int. Acad. Ecol. Environ. Sci., 11, 43
- Karthik, 2016, Bioremediation of Dye Bearing Effluents Using Microbial Biomass, Ecol. Environ. Conserv, 22, S423
- Mahmoudi, Investigation and Optimization of the Performance of Sono-Photo-Electro-Fenton Process for Removal of Acid Black 172 and Disperse Blue 56 from Polluted Water: Comparison of the Degradation Activity with electro-Fenton-based Processes, Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol., 1, 10.1007/s13762-021-03296-0 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Textile effluent treatment methods and eco-friendly resolution of textile wastewater
Azanaw, A., Kassie, B. B., Teshome, B., & Getahun, M. J. (2022) · Case Studies in Chemical and Environmental Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.cscee.2022.100230 · Cited by 435
Alegbe, E. O., & Uthman, T. O. (2024) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33646 · Cited by 435
RetractedKhan, M. Z., Singh, A., Khan, M. Z., Tabraiz, S., & Sheikh, J. N. (2023) · Journal of Water Process Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.jwpe.2023.103579 · Cited by 409
Recent advances in the removal of dyes from wastewater using low-cost adsorbents
Bilal, M., Ihsanullah, I., Shah, M. U. H., Reddy, A. V. B., & Aminabhavi, T. M. (2022) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115981 · Cited by 240
Waste to catalyst: Role of agricultural waste in water and wastewater treatment
Kumar, M., Selvaraj, A., Hassani, A., & Nidheesh, P. V. (2022) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.159762 · Cited by 184
Oladoye, P. O., Kadhom, M. A., Khan, I., Aziz, K. H. H., & Alli, Y. A. (2023) · Green Chemical Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.gce.2023.12.004 · Cited by 177
Aragaw, T. A., & Alene, A. N. (2022) · Emerging contaminants · doi:10.1016/j.emcon.2022.01.002 · Cited by 157
Self-citationRemoval of food dyes using biological materials via adsorption: A review
Şenol, Z. M., Messaoudi, N. E., Ciğeroğlu, Z., Miyah, Y., Arslanoğlu, H., Bağlam, N., Kazan-Kaya, E. S., Kaur, P., & Georgin, J. (2024) · Food Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2024.139398 · Cited by 156
Sheraz, N., Shah, A., Haleem, A., & Iftikhar, F. J. (2024) · RSC Advances · doi:10.1039/d4ra00976b · Cited by 150
Molecular simulation-based insights into dye pollutant adsorption: A perspective review
Salahshoori, I., Wang, Q., Nobre, M. A. L., Mohammadi, A. H., Dawi, E. A., & Khonakdar, H. A. (2024) · Advances in Colloid and Interface Science · doi:10.1016/j.cis.2024.103281 · Cited by 137
Aragaw, T. A., & Bogale, F. M. (2023) · Frontiers in Environmental Science · doi:10.3389/fenvs.2023.1142227 · Cited by 127
Self-citationDiao, Z., Zhang, L., Li, Q., Gao, X., Gao, X., Seliem, M. K., Dhaoudi, F., Sellaoui, L., Deng, S., Bonilla‐Petriciolet, A., et al. (2024) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2024.148982 · Cited by 115
Munir, H., Yaqoob, S., Awan, K. A., Imtiaz, A., Naveed, H., Ahmad, N., Naeem, M. S., Sultan, W., & Ma, Y. (2024) · Foods · doi:10.3390/foods13111681 · Cited by 107
Aragaw, T. A. (2024) · Journal of Hazardous Materials Advances · doi:10.1016/j.hazadv.2024.100493 · Cited by 106
Self-citationBorrero‐López, A. M., Valencia, C., & Franco, J. M. (2022) · Polymers · doi:10.3390/polym14050881 · Cited by 102
Márquez, P., Benítez, A., Chica, A. F., Martı́n, M. A., & Caballero, Á. (2022) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132685 · Cited by 96
Gbair, G. A., & Alshamsi, H. A. (2022) · Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery · doi:10.1007/s13399-022-03408-x · Cited by 96
Role of nanocomposites and nano adsorbents for heavy metals removal and dyes. An overview
Naseer, A. (2024) · Desalination and Water Treatment · doi:10.1016/j.dwt.2024.100662 · Cited by 89
El-Sheekh, M. M., El-Kassas, H. Y., & Ali, S. S. (2025) · Microbial Cell Factories · doi:10.1186/s12934-024-02638-0 · Cited by 86
Ferreira, D. C. M., Santos, T. C. D., Coimbra, J. S. D. R., & de Oliveira, E. B. (2023) · Carbohydrate Polymers · doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2023.120977 · Cited by 84
Adebayo, M. A., Jabar, J. M., Amoko, J. S., Openiyi, E. O., & Shodiya, O. O. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-18763-y · Cited by 80
A comprehensive review of coconut-based porous materials for wastewater treatment and CO2 capture
Khan, M. M. H., Akash, N. M., Akter, S., Rukh, M., Nzediegwu, C., & Islam, M. S. (2023) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117825 · Cited by 78
Al-Askar, A. A., Hashem, A. H., Elhussieny, N. I., & Saied, E. (2023) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules28124679 · Cited by 69
Lignin: A valuable and promising bio-based absorbent for dye removal applications
Fattahi, N., Fattahi, T., Kashif, M., Ramazani, A., & Jung, W. (2024) · International Journal of Biological Macromolecules · doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.133763 · Cited by 68
Eco-friendly adsorbents for industrial dye removal: A comprehensive review of low-cost alternatives
Kassa, A., Engida, A., & Endaye, M. (2025) · Desalination and Water Treatment · doi:10.1016/j.dwt.2025.101362 · Cited by 66
Al-Ghouti, M. A., Ashfaq, M. Y., Khan, M., Disi, Z. A. A., Da’na, D. A., & Shoshaa, R. (2023) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.164854 · Cited by 60
Carrascal-Hernández, D. C., Orozco-Beltrán, E. J., Insuasty, D., Márquez, E., & Grande‐Tovar, C. D. (2025) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms26167973 · Cited by 58
Chahar, M., Khaturia, S., Singh, H. L., Solanki, V. S., Agarwal, N., Sahoo, D. K., Yadav, V. K., & Patel, A. (2023) · Frontiers in Environmental Science · doi:10.3389/fenvs.2023.1226101 · Cited by 56
A Review of the Removal of Dyestuffs from Effluents onto Biochar
Parthasarathy, P., Sajjad, S., Saleem, J., Alherbawi, M., & McKay, G. (2022) · Separations · doi:10.3390/separations9060139 · Cited by 55
Mozhiarasi, V., & Natarajan, T. S. (2022) · Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery · doi:10.1007/s13399-022-03211-8 · Cited by 55
Ahamad, Z., & Nasar, A. (2023) · Sustainable Chemistry · doi:10.3390/suschem4010009 · Cited by 53
Rathore, C., Yadav, V. K., Amari, A., Meena, A., Egbosiuba, T. C., Verma, R. K., Mahdhi, N., Choudhary, N., Sahoo, D. K., Chundawat, R. S., et al. (2024) · Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology · doi:10.3389/fbioe.2023.1323249 · Cited by 53
RetractedMeziani, S. E., Agnaou, H., Haddaj, H. E., Boumya, W., Barka, N., & Elhalil, A. (2025) · Cleaner Chemical Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.clce.2025.100210 · Cited by 52
Haque, M. M., Haque, M. A., Mosharaf, M. K., Islam, M. S., Islam, M. M., Hasan, M., Molla, A. H., & Haque, M. A. (2022) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2022.120237 · Cited by 50
Aragaw, T. A., Bogale, F. M., & Gessesse, A. (2022) · Frontiers in Physiology · doi:10.3389/fphys.2022.908370 · Cited by 49
Self-citationAlouani, M. E., Aouan, B., Rachdi, Y., Alehyen, S., Herradi, E. H. E., Saufi, H., Mabrouki, J., & Barka, N. (2022) · International Journal of Environmental & Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1080/03067319.2022.2115891 · Cited by 46
Biosorption of acid brown 14 dye to mandarin-CO-TETA derived from mandarin peels
Eldeeb, T. M., Aigbe, U. O., Ukhurebor, K. E., Onyancha, R. B., El-Nemr, M. A., Hassaan, M. A., Osibote, O. A., Ragab, S., Okundaye, B., Balogun, V. A., et al. (2022) · Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery · doi:10.1007/s13399-022-02664-1 · Cited by 46
A Review of the Biomass Valorization Hierarchy
Cansado, I. P. D. P., Mourão, P. A. M., Castanheiro, J. E. F., Geraldo, P. F., Suhas, S., Román, S., & Ledesma, B. (2025) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su17010335 · Cited by 44
A review of adsorbents for removal of yellow tartrazine dye from water and wastewater
Micheletti, D. H., Andrade, J. G. D. S., Porto, C. E., MICHELETTI, B. H., de Carvalho, F. R., Sakai, O. A., & Batistela, V. R. (2023) · Bioresource Technology Reports · doi:10.1016/j.biteb.2023.101598 · Cited by 41
Adeoye, J. B., Lau, S. Y., Tan, Y. H., Tan, Y. Y., Chiong, T., Mubarak, N. M., Anbuchezhiyan, G., Khalid, M., & Ng, J. T. W. (2025) · Discover Applied Sciences · doi:10.1007/s42452-025-07250-4 · Cited by 41
Solanki, S., Sinha, S., Bisaria, K., Singh, R., & Saxena, R. (2022) · Environmental Research · doi:10.1016/j.envres.2022.113844 · Cited by 40
Norfarhana, A. S., Khoo, P. S., Ilyas, R. A., Hamid, N. H. A., Aisyah, H. A., Norrrahim, M. N. F., Knight, V. F., Rani, M. S. A., Septevani, A. A., Syafri, E., et al. (2024) · Journal of Polymers and the Environment · doi:10.1007/s10924-024-03227-3 · Cited by 38
Aniagor, C. O., Aly, A., Mohamed, L. A., & Hashem, A. (2024) · Waste Management Bulletin · doi:10.1016/j.wmb.2024.05.003 · Cited by 38
Yadav, S. K., Rajput, P., Balasubramanian, P., Liu, C., Li, F., & Zhang, P. (2025) · Carbon Research · doi:10.1007/s44246-024-00168-3 · Cited by 38
Hashemi, E., Norouzi, M.-M., & Sadeghi‐Kiakhani, M. (2024) · Environmental Research · doi:10.1016/j.envres.2024.119548 · Cited by 36
Effect of Ethiopian kaolin treatment on the performance of adsorptive removal of methylene blue dye
Sibhat, W. T., Ayele, H. S., Atlabachew, M., Mohammed, K. S., Aragaw, B. A., Abebaw, B., & Tibebe, D. (2025) · Results in Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.rechem.2025.102027 · Cited by 35
Kassahun, E., Fito, J., Tibebu, S., Nkambule, T. T. I., Nadew, T. T., Sime, T., & Kloos, H. (2022) · Journal of Chemistry · doi:10.1155/2022/4874502 · Cited by 35
Bogale, F. M., Teffera, B., & Aragaw, T. A. (2024) · Journal of Hazardous Materials Advances · doi:10.1016/j.hazadv.2024.100438 · Cited by 34
Self-citationRecent progress on the remediation of dyes in wastewater using cellulose-based adsorbents
Samuel, M. S., John. J, A., Ravikumar, M., Raizada, P., Wan Azelee, N. I., Selvarajan, E., & Selvasembian, R. (2023) · Industrial Crops and Products · doi:10.1016/j.indcrop.2023.117590 · Cited by 34
Younes, M. K., Algburi, S. S., Omari, R. H. A., & Abdulhameed, A. S. (2024) · Desalination and Water Treatment · doi:10.1016/j.dwt.2024.100795 · Cited by 32
Mosisa, M. T., Zhang, P., Su, Z., Wu, B., Chen, L., Liao, Y., Farooq, A., Lu, D., Abdeta, A. B., Kuo, D., et al. (2024) · Journal of environmental chemical engineering · doi:10.1016/j.jece.2024.112111 · Cited by 31
Xue, X., Zhang, J., Li, M., Ao, C., Wang, Q., Zhao, J., Zhang, W., & Lu, C. (2022) · Carbohydrate Polymers · doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2022.120455 · Cited by 30
Green Synthesis of MgO Nano Particle Loaded Onto Carbon for Effective Rhodamine B Dye Removal
Senthilkumar, P., Aravind, M., Janakiraman, K., Kamalesh, M., Saruhasan, M., Kumar, J. A., Prasad, B. S. N., & Торсыкбаева, Б. Б. (2024) · Environmental Quality Management · doi:10.1002/tqem.22298 · Cited by 28
Wang, Y., Zhang, T., Huang, M.-Z., Zhang, M., & He, Y.-C. (2024) · International Journal of Biological Macromolecules · doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.136512 · Cited by 28
Samaraweera, H., Alam, S. S., Nawalage, S., Parashar, D., Khan, A. H., Chui, I., Perez, F. A., & Mlsna, T. (2023) · Journal of Water Process Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.jwpe.2023.104377 · Cited by 28
Bakhtaoui, Y., Ali, M. B., Ouakki, M., Khattabi, O. E., Azzouzi, N. E., & Srhir, B. (2025) · Next Materials · doi:10.1016/j.nxmate.2025.101072 · Cited by 27
Zarghmapour, S., Khodadadi, A., Rahimpoor, R., Mengelīzadeh, N., & Balarak, D. (2025) · Results in Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.rineng.2025.104426 · Cited by 27
Exploring the Utilisation of Natural Biosorbents for Effective Methylene Blue Removal
Güleç, F., Williams, O. S. A., Samson, A., Kostas, E. T., Stevens, L. A., & Lester, E. H. (2023) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app14010081 · Cited by 26
Wasilewska, M., Deryło‐Marczewska, A., & Marczewski, A. W. (2024) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules29092038 · Cited by 26
Hemicelluloses hydrogel: Synthesis, characterization, and application in dye removal
Rodríguez-Ramírez, C. A., Tasqué, J. E., García, N. L., & D’Accorso, N. B. (2023) · International Journal of Biological Macromolecules · doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.127010 · Cited by 26
Efficient water purification: CuO-enhanced biochar from banana peels for removing Congo red dye
Essa, R. A., Amin, S., Sedky, A., Zeid, E. F. A., & El–Aal, M. A. (2024) · Environmental Science and Pollution Research · doi:10.1007/s11356-024-34929-9 · Cited by 26
Almaraz-Vega, E., Morales-Vargas, A. I., Delgado, G. G., Castellanos-Arteaga, L., Gómez, O. I., & Salcedo, C. C. F. (2026) · Nanomaterials · doi:10.3390/nano16010075 · Cited by 25
Removal of wood dyes from aqueous solutions by sorption on untreated pine (Pinus radiata) sawdust
Pimentel, C. H., Freire, M. S., Gómez-Dı́az, D., & González‐Álvarez, J. (2023) · Cellulose · doi:10.1007/s10570-023-05145-4 · Cited by 25
Biomass‐Derived Carbon Materials for the Adsorption of Organic Pollutants
Qiu, S., Li, Q., Li, X., Ma, J., Wu, L., Xie, X., Wu, L., Askari, S., Dewangan, N., Ashok, J., et al. (2023) · Advanced Sustainable Systems · doi:10.1002/adsu.202300340 · Cited by 25
Saravanan, A., Yaashikaa, P. R., Kumar, P. S., Dinakarkumar, Y., Karishma, S., Muthu, C. M. M., Nasrin, M. R. T., Sree, G. A., Karthik, V., Natrayan, L., et al. (2023) · Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery · doi:10.1007/s13399-023-05067-y · Cited by 24
Abdullah, N. H., Borhan, A., & Saadon, S. Z. A. H. (2023) · Bioresource Technology Reports · doi:10.1016/j.biteb.2023.101705 · Cited by 24
Anastopoulos, I. P., Giannakoudakis, D. A., Frontistis, Z., Zorpas, A. A., Pashalidis, I., & Triantafyllidis, K. S. (2024) · Current Opinion in Green and Sustainable Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.cogsc.2024.100902 · Cited by 24
Shao, Z., Zhao, Y., Wang, S., Xie, L., Zhang, L., Xu, K., & Chai, X. (2024) · Colloids and Surfaces A Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects · doi:10.1016/j.colsurfa.2024.135505 · Cited by 23
Şimşek, V., Yarbay, R. Z., Marttin, V., & Gül, Ü. D. (2023) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138448 · Cited by 23
Kumari, B., Seedat, N., Moothi, K., & Roopchund, R. (2025) · Results in Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.rineng.2025.107147 · Cited by 22
Krishnappa, B., Bhat, V. S., Ancy, V., Joshi, J. C., Jyothi, M. S., Naik, M., & Hegde, G. (2022) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules27207017 · Cited by 22
El-Nemr, M. A., Hassaan, M. A., & Ashour, I. A. (2023) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-023-33075-5 · Cited by 22
A review on decontamination of aqueous systems using chitosan-derived adsorbents
Kowanga, D. K., & Nyairo, W. N. (2025) · Discover Environment · doi:10.1007/s44274-025-00435-z · Cited by 21
Aslaheh, H. S., Marjani, A. P., & Balkanloo, P. G. (2023) · Journal of Polymers and the Environment · doi:10.1007/s10924-023-02794-1 · Cited by 21
Pine needles, a forest waste biomass, driven biosorbent for malachite green dye
Ranote, S., Chauhan, S., Kumar, K., Kowalczuk, M. M., & Chauhan, G. S. (2023) · Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery · doi:10.1007/s13399-023-04611-0 · Cited by 21
Şenol, Z. M., Keskin, Z. S., Dinçer, E., & Ayed, A. B. (2024) · Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery · doi:10.1007/s13399-024-05584-4 · Cited by 21
Devi, M. S., Thangadurai, T. D., Shanmugaraju, S., Selvan, C. P., & Lee, Y. (2024) · Adsorption · doi:10.1007/s10450-024-00458-7 · Cited by 21
Hu, H., Zhao, L., Yao, L., He, M., Lv, Y., & Li, R. (2024) · Journal of Chromatography A · doi:10.1016/j.chroma.2024.464781 · Cited by 20
Alanazi, A. A. (2023) · Desalination and Water Treatment · doi:10.5004/dwt.2023.29519 · Cited by 19
Bazargan, M., Taheri, S. E. H., Vosough, P. R., Sadeghian, A., Zarch, M. B., & Mirzaei, M. (2024) · International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology · doi:10.1007/s13762-024-06199-y · Cited by 18
Nandal, K., & Jindal, R. (2025) · International Journal of Biological Macromolecules · doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2025.145557 · Cited by 18
Lignocellulosic Biomass as Sorbent for Fluoride Removal in Drinking Water
Robledo-Peralta, A., Torres-Castañón, L. A., Rodríguez-Beltrán, R. I., & Reynoso-Cuevas, L. (2022) · Polymers · doi:10.3390/polym14235219 · Cited by 18
Chee, D. N. A., Aziz, F., Ismail, A. F., Kueh, A. B. H., Amin, M. A. M., & Amran, M. (2023) · Chemical Engineering Science · doi:10.1016/j.ces.2023.118775 · Cited by 18
Vithalkar, S. H., Jugade, R., & Saravanan, D. (2022) · AQUA - Water Infrastructure Ecosystems and Society · doi:10.2166/aqua.2022.076 · Cited by 17
Bimetallic Organic Gel for Effective Methyl Orange Dye Adsorption
Jin, H., Xu, X., Yu, X., Yu, S., Wang, S., & Qu, X. (2024) · Gels · doi:10.3390/gels10030208 · Cited by 17
Verma, P., Sirotiya, V., Rathore, R., Kumar, A., Rai, A., Soni, U., Khalid, M., Yadav, K. K., & Vinayak, V. (2024) · Process Safety and Environmental Protection · doi:10.1016/j.psep.2024.08.009 · Cited by 17
ZnO/TiO 2 photocatalytic nanocomposite for dye and bacteria removal in wastewater
Hạnh, T. T., Truong, H. B., & Nguyen, T. C. (2024) · Materials Research Express · doi:10.1088/2053-1591/ad6bf2 · Cited by 17
Emerging antibiotic pollution and its remedy by waste based biochar adsorbents: a review
Hamid, I., Ahmadipour, M., Ahmed, M. J., Rizvi, M. A., Shalla, A. H., & Khanday, W. A. (2025) · Environmental Science and Pollution Research · doi:10.1007/s11356-025-36253-2 · Cited by 17
Tochetto, G. A., da Silva, T. C., Bampi, J., Moreira, R. D. F. P. M., da Luz, C., Pasquali, G. D. L., & Dervanoski, A. (2022) · Water Air & Soil Pollution · doi:10.1007/s11270-022-05737-z · Cited by 17
Azmi, N., Lock, S. S. M., Berghuis, N. T., Sarwono, A., Zahra, N. L., Rahman, A., Waqas, S., & Farooqi, A. S. (2024) · Results in Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.rineng.2024.102401 · Cited by 16
Nankawa, T., Sugita, A., Fukakusa, C., Yamada, T., & Sekine, Y. (2025) · Separation and Purification Technology · doi:10.1016/j.seppur.2025.134780 · Cited by 15
Vashchynskyi, V., Okhay, O., & Boichuk, T. (2023) · C – Journal of Carbon Research · doi:10.3390/c9040093 · Cited by 15
Van, H. T., Hoang, V. H., Luu, T. C., Linh, T. K., Nga, L. T. Q., Marcaida, G. S. I. J., & Tho, P. T. (2023) · RSC Advances · doi:10.1039/d3ra04553f · Cited by 15
Borham, A., Haroun, M., Saleh, I. A., Zomot, N., Okla, M. K., Askar, M., Elmasry, M., Elshahat, A., Liu, L., Zhao, C., et al. (2024) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34972 · Cited by 15
Kim, D., Kim, D., Cha, J. E., Park, S., & Lee, S. H. (2025) · Gels · doi:10.3390/gels11080596 · Cited by 15
Kassahun, E., Tibebu, S., Tadesse, Y., & Awish, N. (2022) · Advances in Materials Science and Engineering · doi:10.1155/2022/2325213 · Cited by 15
Dodoo, D., Appiah, G., Acquaah, G., & Dodoo, T. (2023) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14310 · Cited by 15
Hassan, J., Talib, K. M., Ammar, G. G., & Qin, C. (2024) · Advanced Powder Technology · doi:10.1016/j.apt.2024.104394 · Cited by 15
El-Nemr, M. A., Hassaan, M. A., & Ashour, I. A. (2022) · Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery · doi:10.1007/s13399-022-03655-y · Cited by 14
Ahmed, M., & Nasar, A. (2023) · Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering · doi:10.1007/s13369-023-07673-4 · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Aragaw, T. A., & Bogale, F. M.
- Affiliations
- Bahir Dar University (ET)
- Corresponding author
- Aragaw, Tadele Assefa
- Venue
- Frontiers in Environmental Science
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2021-12-09
- Volume
- 9
- ISSN
- 2296-665X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4200145837
- Cited by
- 360
- References
- 199
- Citations by year
- 2026: 102 · 2025: 83 · 2024: 84 · 2023: 58 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 2
- FWCI
- 13.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Frontiers in Environmental Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Coagulation and Flocculation Studies
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology › Enzyme-mediated dye degradation
- Keywords
- dye removal, azo dyes, biomass-derived adsorbents, biosorption, textile wastewater, adsorption isotherms, Langmuir isotherm, Freundlich isotherm, multilayer adsorption, agricultural waste adsorbent, activated carbon, yeast, desorption, low-cost wastewater treatment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-11-08, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-08 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review