The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Insight into understanding the performance of deep eutectic solvent pretreatment on improving enzymatic digestibility of bamboo residues
Abstract
Deep eutectic solvent (DES) is a promising pretreatment for improving enzymatic digestibility of lignocellulosic material by altering the physicochemical properties. However, few work has been done to quantitatively analysis the physicochemical properties changes of lignocellulosic material with enzymatic digestibility. In this work, DES pretreatment with different molar ratios of choline chloride/lactic acid was carried out on bamboo residues and respective enzymatic digestibility was investigated and linearly fitted with corresponding physicochemical features changes of the pretreated bamboo residues. Results showed that enzymatic digestibility of DES-pretreated bamboo residues was enhanced with the increasing molar ratio of choline chloride/lactic acid, which was due to DES pretreatment's ability to remove lignin and xylan, reduce the degree of polymerization of cellulose, enhance the crystallite size of cellulose, and improve cellulose accessibility. Several compelling linear correlations (R2 = 0.6-0.9) were observable between enzymatic digestibility and these changes of physicochemical properties, demonstrating how DES pretreatment improve the enzymatic digestibility.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kumar, A. K., Parikh, B. S., & Pravakar, M. (2016) · Environmental Science and Pollution Research · doi:10.1007/s11356-015-4780-4 · Cited by 571
Shen, X.-J., Chen, T., Wang, H.-M., Mei, Q., Yue, F., Sun, S., Wen, J.-L., Yuan, T.-Q., & Sun, R.-C. (2020) · ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering · doi:10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b05106 · Cited by 266
Cited by
Bacterial Cellulose-Based Composite Scaffolds for Biomedical Applications: A Review
Liu, W., Du, H., Zhang, M., Liu, K., Liu, H., Xie, H., Zhang, X., & Si, C. (2020) · ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering · doi:10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c00125 · Cited by 447
Wang, W., & Lee, D.-J. (2021) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2021.125587 · Cited by 406
Freitas, L. C., Barbosa, J. R., da Costa, A. L. C., Bezerra, F. W. F., Pinto, R. H. H., & Carvalho Junior, R. N. D. (2021) · Resources, Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105466 · Cited by 328
Recent advances in the valorization of plant biomass
Ning, P., Yang, G., Hu, L., Sun, J., Shi, L., Zhou, Y., Wang, Z., & Yang, J. (2021) · Biotechnology for Biofuels · doi:10.1186/s13068-021-01949-3 · Cited by 296
Xu, H., Kong, Y., Peng, J., Song, X., Liu, Y., Su, Z., Li, B., Gao, C., & Tian, W. (2021) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2020.124209 · Cited by 131
Metadata
- Authors
- Lin, W., Xing, S., Jin, Y., Lu, X., Huang, C., & Yong, Q.
- Venue
- Bioresource Technology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-06
- Volume
- 306
- Pages
- 123163
- ISSN
- 0960-8524 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3010898847
- Cited by
- 315
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 16.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Insight into understanding the performance of deep eutectic solvent pretreatment on improving enzymatic digestibility of bamboo residues. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123163
- The paper
- Lin, W., Xing, S., Jin, Y., Lu, X., Huang, C., & Yong, Q. (2020). Insight into understanding the performance of deep eutectic solvent pretreatment on improving enzymatic digestibility of bamboo residues. Bioresource Technology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123163
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
