Cited by 28Analytical Chemistry and SensorsElectrochemical sensors and biosensorsNanowire Synthesis and Applications

The interplay between pH sensitivity and label-free protein detection in immunologically modified nano-scaled field-effect transistor

Shalev, Gil, Rosenwaks, Yossi, Levy, Ilan·2012·Biosensors and Bioelectronics

Abstract

We present experimental results in order to establish a correlation between pH sensitivity of immunologically modified nano-scaled field-effect transistor (NS-ImmunoFET) with their sensing capacity for label-free detection. The NS-ImmunoFETs are fabricated from silicon-on-insulator (SOI) wafers and are fully-depleted with thickness of ~20 nm. The data shows that higher sensitivity to pH entails enhanced sensitivity to analyte detection. This suggests that the mechanism of analyte detection as pure electrostatic perturbation induced by antibody-analyte interaction is over simplified. The fundamental assumption, in existing models for field-effect sensing mechanism assumes that the analyte molecules do not directly interact with the surface but rather stand 'deep' in the solution and away from the dielectric surface. Recent studies clearly provide contradicting evidence demonstrating that antibodies lie down flat on the surface. These observations led us to propose that the proteins that cover the gate area intimately interact with active sites on the surface thus forming a network of interacting sites. Since sensitivity to pH is directly correlated with the amount of amphoteric sites, we witness a direct correlation between sensitivity to pH and analyte detection. The highest and lowest threshold voltage shift for a label-free and specific detection of 6.5 nM IgG were 40 mV and 2.3 mV for NS-ImmunoFETs with pH sensitivity of 35 mV/decade and 15 mV/decade, respectively. Finally, physical modeling of the NS-ImmunoFET is presented and charge of a single IgG protein at pH 6 is calculated. The obtained value is consistent with charge of IgG protein cited in literature.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bios.2011.11.038

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shalev, G., Rosenwaks, Y., & Levy, I.
Affiliations
  • Tel Aviv University (IL)
  • Soroka Medical Center (IL)
Corresponding author
Rosenwaks, Yossi
Venue
Biosensors and Bioelectronics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-01
Volume
31
Issue
1
Pages
510-515
ISSN
0956-5663 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2006444815
Cited by
28
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3
FWCI
1.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biosensors and Bioelectronics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Bioengineering › Analytical Chemistry and Sensors
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electrochemical sensors and biosensors
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Nanowire Synthesis and Applications
Keywords
immunosensor, label-free protein detection, pH sensitivity, IgG detection, threshold voltage shift, protein surface charge, silicon-on-insulator, fully depleted SOI
MeSH terms
Amplifiers, Electronic, Conductometry, Equipment Design, Hydrogen-Ion Concentration, Immunoglobulin G, Immunoassay, Sensitivity and Specificity, Transistors, Electronic, Reproducibility of Results, Biosensing Techniques, Equipment Failure Analysis, Nanotechnology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review