The DOI matches its Crossref record; 119 of the 119 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Significance of nanomaterials in electrochemical glucose sensors: An updated review (2016-2020)
Abstract
The last decade has witnessed an immense demand for the development of new glucose biosensors. The research has mainly focused on achieving biocompatible and improved sensing capabilities as compared to the current technologies, which opens new directions toward more efficient glucose sensors. These sensing platforms have been continuously evolving with the contribution of novel materials, such as gold, platinum, metal alloys/adatom, graphene, composites and glucose-specific organic materials, owing to their electrocatalytic response to the oxidation of glucose. The chief motive of this review is to cover the recent advances on enzymatic and non-enzymatic glucose sensors evolved in the last four years. We discuss the sensor fabrication methods, the materials and nanostructures involved, the detection principles and the performance of the sensors in whole blood, saliva, urine or interstitial fluids in detail.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
1 retracted
Başkaya, G., Yıldız, Y., Savk, A., Okyay, T. O., Eriş, S., Sert, H., & Şen, F. (2017) · Biosensors and Bioelectronics · doi:10.1016/j.bios.2017.01.045 · Cited by 156
RetractedUltrastructural Characterization of the Lower Motor System in a Mouse Model of Krabbe Disease
Cappello, V., Marchetti, L., Parlanti, P., Landi, S., Tonazzini, I., Cecchini, M., Piazza, V., & Gemmi, M. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-016-0001-8 · Cited by 13,097
Electrochemical Glucose Biosensors
Wang, J. (2008) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr068123a · Cited by 3,498
Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus
American Diabetes Association (2013) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc13-s067 · Cited by 2,245
Lee, H., Choi, T. K., Lee, Y. B., Cho, H. R., Ghaffari, R., Wang, L., Choi, H. J., Chung, T. D., Lu, N., Hyeon, T., et al. (2016) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/nnano.2016.38 · Cited by 1,802
Carbon Nanomaterials in Biosensors: Should You Use Nanotubes or Graphene?
Yang, W., Ratinac, K. R., Ringer, S. P., Thordarson, P., Gooding, J. J., & Braet, F. (2010) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.200903463 · Cited by 1,431
Glucose oxidase: an ideal enzyme
Wilson, R., & Turner, A. P. F. (1992) · Biosensors and Bioelectronics · doi:10.1016/0956-5663(92)87013-f · Cited by 1,350
UPDIKE, S. J., & HICKS, G. P. (1967) · Nature · doi:10.1038/214986a0 · Cited by 1,336
Electrochemical non-enzymatic glucose sensors
Park, S., Boo, H., & Chung, T. D. (2006) · Analytica Chimica Acta · doi:10.1016/j.aca.2005.05.080 · Cited by 1,159
Electrochemical Non-enzymatic Glucose Sensors: A Perspective and an Evaluation
Toghill, K. E., & Compton, R. G. (2010) · International Journal of Electrochemical Science · doi:10.1016/s1452-3981(23)15359-4 · Cited by 926
Cited by
Review—Perovskite/Spinel Based Graphene Derivatives Electrochemical and Biosensors
dos Santos, O. A. L., Sneha, M., Devarani, T., Bououdina, M., Backx, B. P., Vijaya, J. J., & Bellucci, S. (2021) · Journal of The Electrochemical Society · doi:10.1149/1945-7111/ac0306 · Cited by 32
Metadata
- Authors
- Sehit, E., & Altintas, Z.
- Venue
- Biosensors and Bioelectronics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-07
- Volume
- 159
- Pages
- 112165
- ISSN
- 0956-5663 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3013994763
- Cited by
- 380
- References
- 119
- FWCI
- 22.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Significance of nanomaterials in electrochemical glucose sensors: An updated review (2016-2020). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.bios.2020.112165
- The paper
- Sehit, E., & Altintas, Z. (2020). Significance of nanomaterials in electrochemical glucose sensors: An updated review (2016-2020). Biosensors and Bioelectronics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2020.112165
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
