Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 926

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Electrochemical Non-enzymatic Glucose Sensors: A Perspective and an Evaluation

Open access
Toghill, Kathryn E., Compton, Richard G.·2010·International Journal of Electrochemical Science

Abstract

An overview of glucose sensors is presented, with specific focus on the promise of non-enzymatic electrochemical glucose sensors. The review addresses their merits and shortfalls with respect to their commercially available enzymatic counterparts. The mechanisms for catalysis are evaluated, and the future of the systems discussed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1452-3981(23)15359-4

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 926

Metadata

Authors
Toghill, K. E., & Compton, R. G.
Venue
International Journal of Electrochemical Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-09
Volume
5
Issue
9
Pages
1246-1301
ISSN
1452-3981 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W11159070
Cited by
926
References
5
FWCI
30.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Electrochemical Non-enzymatic Glucose Sensors: A Perspective and an Evaluation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s1452-3981(23)15359-4
The paper
Toghill, K. E., & Compton, R. G. (2010). Electrochemical Non-enzymatic Glucose Sensors: A Perspective and an Evaluation. International Journal of Electrochemical Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1452-3981(23)15359-4

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.