Cited by 17DNA and Biological ComputingPhysical Unclonable Functions (PUFs) and Hardware SecurityAdvanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques

DNA-based random number generation in security circuitry

Open access
Gearheart, Christy M., Arazi, Benjamin, Rouchka, Eric C.·2010·Biosystems

Abstract

DNA-based circuit design is an area of research in which traditional silicon-based technologies are replaced by naturally occurring phenomena taken from biochemistry and molecular biology. This research focuses on further developing DNA-based methodologies to mimic digital data manipulation. While exhibiting fundamental principles, this work was done in conjunction with the vision that DNA-based circuitry, when the technology matures, will form the basis for a tamper-proof security module, revolutionizing the meaning and concept of tamper-proofing and possibly preventing it altogether based on accurate scientific observations. A paramount part of such a solution would be self-generation of random numbers. A novel prototype schema employs solid phase synthesis of oligonucleotides for random construction of DNA sequences; temporary storage and retrieval is achieved through plasmid vectors. A discussion of how to evaluate sequence randomness is included, as well as how these techniques are applied to a simulation of the random number generation circuitry. Simulation results show generated sequences successfully pass three selected NIST random number generation tests specified for security applications.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biosystems.2010.03.005

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previous work theoretically proposed a scheme for a possible automated workflow for DNA random number generation, but the physical realization of the theory and experimental limitations were not investigated.

    “Previous work has presented the idea of simulation of the DNA random number generation circuitry by theoretically proposing a scheme for a possible automated workflow for DNA random number generation. However, the physical realization of the theory and the experimental limitations were not investigated21,22.”

    From DNA synthesis for true random number generation (2020) · cites this paper as [21]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Schneider T Hengen PN 2004 Molecular Computing Elements, Gates and Flip-Flops Pages 37 in USA, ed. USA
  2. Weigl A Anheier W 2003 Hardware Comparison of Seven Random Number Generators for Smart Cards 55 58 ITG-GI-GMM Workshop of Test Methods and Reliability of Circuits and Systems Timmendorfer Beach

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gearheart, C. M., Arazi, B., & Rouchka, E. C.
Affiliations
  • University of Louisville (US)
  • Ben-Gurion University of the Negev (IL)
Corresponding author
Rouchka, Eric C.
Venue
Biosystems
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-06
Volume
100
Issue
3
Pages
208-214
ISSN
0303-2647 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1972152317
Cited by
17
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Biosystems (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (P20GM103436)
  • National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (P30ES014443)
  • National Center for Research Resources (P20RR016481)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA and Biological Computing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Hardware and Architecture › Physical Unclonable Functions (PUFs) and Hardware Security
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques
Keywords
random number generation, DNA computing, solid-phase oligonucleotide synthesis, plasmid vectors, NIST randomness tests
MeSH terms
Base Sequence, Plasmids, Random Allocation, Software, Computer Security, Computers, Molecular, Microfluidic Analytical Techniques, Systems Biology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review