Cited by 42Neural dynamics and brain functionQuantum Mechanics and ApplicationsCognitive Science and Education Research

Quantum-like model of behavioral response computation using neural oscillators

Open access
de Barros, J. Acacio·2012·Biosystems

Abstract

In this paper we propose the use of neural interference as the origin of quantum-like effects in the brain. We do so by using a neural oscillator model consistent with neurophysiological data. The model used was shown elsewhere to reproduce well the predictions of behavioral stimulus-response theory. The quantum-like effects are brought about by the spreading activation of incompatible oscillators, leading to an interference-like effect mediated by inhibitory and excitatory synapses.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biosystems.2012.10.002

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • De Barros and Suppes demonstrated that neural oscillators can generate interference patterns analogous to those observed in unitary evolution.

    “De Barros and Suppes (2009) (see also De Barros, 2012) demonstrated that neural oscillators can generate interference patterns analogous to those observed in unitary evolution.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 65 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
de Barros, J. A.
Venue
Biosystems
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-12
Volume
110
Issue
3
Pages
171-182
ISSN
0303-2647 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2096874581
Cited by
42
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 7 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Biosystems (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Cognitive Science and Education Research
Keywords
quantum-like models, neural oscillators, stimulus-response theory, spreading activation
MeSH terms
Brain, Cognition, Decision Making, Humans, Learning, Models, Neurological, Quantum Theory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review