Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 489

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Machine learning based prediction of soil total nitrogen, organic carbon and moisture content by using VIS-NIR spectroscopy

Open access
Morellos, Antonios, Pantazi, Xanthoula-Eirini, Moshou, Dimitrios, Alexandridis, Thomas, Whetton, Rebecca, Tziotzios, Georgios, Wiebensohn, Jens, Bill, Ralf, Mouazen, Abdul M.·2016·Biosystems Engineering

Abstract

It is widely known that the visible and near infrared (VIS-NIR) spectroscopy has the potential of estimating soil total nitrogen (TN), organic carbon (OC) and moisture content (MC) due to the direct spectral responses these properties have in the near infrared (NIR) region. However, improving the prediction accuracy requires advanced modelling techniques, particularly when measurement is planned for fresh (wet and un-processed) soil samples. The aim of this work is to compare the predictive performance of two linear multivariate and two machine learning methods for TN, OC and MC. The two multivariate methods investigated included principal component regression (PCR) and partial least squares regression (PLSR), whereas the machine learning methods included least squares support vector machines (LS-SVM), and Cubist. A mobile, fibre type, VIS-NIR spectrophotometer was utilised to collect soil spectra (305–2200 nm) in diffuse reflectance mode from 140 wet soil samples collected from one field in Germany. The results indicate that machine learning methods are capable of tackling non-linear problems in the dataset. LS-SVMs and the Cubist method out-performed the linear multivariate methods for the prediction of all three soil properties studied. LS-SVM provided the best prediction for MC (root mean square error of prediction (RMSEP) = 0.457% and residual prediction deviation (RPD) = 2.24) and OC (RMSEP = 0.062% and RPD = 2.20), whereas the Cubist method provided the best prediction for TN (RMSEP = 0.071 and RPD = 1.96).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2016.04.018

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 40 references

Cited by

See all 489

Metadata

Authors
Morellos, A., Pantazi, X.-E., Moshou, D., Alexandridis, T., Whetton, R., Tziotzios, G., Wiebensohn, J., Bill, R., & Mouazen, A. M.
Venue
Biosystems Engineering
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-12
Volume
152
Pages
104-116
ISSN
1537-5110 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2399675776
Cited by
489
References
40
FWCI
16.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Machine learning based prediction of soil total nitrogen, organic carbon and moisture content by using VIS-NIR spectroscopy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2016.04.018
The paper
Morellos, A., Pantazi, X.-E., Moshou, D., Alexandridis, T., Whetton, R., Tziotzios, G., Wiebensohn, J., Bill, R., & Mouazen, A. M. (2016). Machine learning based prediction of soil total nitrogen, organic carbon and moisture content by using VIS-NIR spectroscopy. Biosystems Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2016.04.018

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.