The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Machine learning based prediction of soil total nitrogen, organic carbon and moisture content by using VIS-NIR spectroscopy
Open accessAbstract
It is widely known that the visible and near infrared (VIS-NIR) spectroscopy has the potential of estimating soil total nitrogen (TN), organic carbon (OC) and moisture content (MC) due to the direct spectral responses these properties have in the near infrared (NIR) region. However, improving the prediction accuracy requires advanced modelling techniques, particularly when measurement is planned for fresh (wet and un-processed) soil samples. The aim of this work is to compare the predictive performance of two linear multivariate and two machine learning methods for TN, OC and MC. The two multivariate methods investigated included principal component regression (PCR) and partial least squares regression (PLSR), whereas the machine learning methods included least squares support vector machines (LS-SVM), and Cubist. A mobile, fibre type, VIS-NIR spectrophotometer was utilised to collect soil spectra (305–2200 nm) in diffuse reflectance mode from 140 wet soil samples collected from one field in Germany. The results indicate that machine learning methods are capable of tackling non-linear problems in the dataset. LS-SVMs and the Cubist method out-performed the linear multivariate methods for the prediction of all three soil properties studied. LS-SVM provided the best prediction for MC (root mean square error of prediction (RMSEP) = 0.457% and residual prediction deviation (RPD) = 2.24) and OC (RMSEP = 0.062% and RPD = 2.20), whereas the Cubist method provided the best prediction for TN (RMSEP = 0.071 and RPD = 1.96).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory
Vapnik, V. N. (1995) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-2440-0 · Cited by 39,138
Smoothing and Differentiation of Data by Simplified Least Squares Procedures.
Savitzky, A., & Golay, M. J. E. (1964) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac60214a047 · Cited by 21,904
Cross validatory choice and assessment of statistical predictions
Stone, M. (1974) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1974.tb00994.x · Cited by 10,881
A note on a general definition of the coefficient of determination
NAGELKERKE, N. J. D. (1991) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/78.3.691 · Cited by 5,927
Standard Normal Variate Transformation and De-Trending of Near-Infrared Diffuse Reflectance Spectra
Barnes, R. J., Dhanoa, M. S., & Lister, S. J. (1989) · Applied Spectroscopy · doi:10.1366/0003702894202201 · Cited by 3,867
Steele, D. (1990) · Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular Spectroscopy · doi:10.1016/0584-8539(90)80069-b · Cited by 2,240
Viscarra Rossel, R. A., Walvoort, D. J. J., McBratney, A. B., Janik, L. J., & Skjemstad, J. O. (2006) · Geoderma · doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2005.03.007 · Cited by 2,165
Near‐Infrared Reflectance Spectroscopy–Principal Components Regression Analyses of Soil Properties
Chang, C.-W., Laird, D. A., Mausbach, M. J., & Hurburgh, C. R. (2001) · Soil Science Society of America Journal · doi:10.2136/sssaj2001.652480x · Cited by 1,926
Visible and near infrared spectroscopy in soil science
Stenberg, B., Viscarra Rossel, R. A., Mouazen, A. M., & Wetterlind, J. (2010) · Advances in Agronomy · doi:10.1016/s0065-2113(10)07005-7 · Cited by 1,549
Self-citationUsing data mining to model and interpret soil diffuse reflectance spectra
Rossel, R. A. V., & Behrens, T. (2010) · Geoderma · doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2009.12.025 · Cited by 1,264
Cited by
Machine Learning in Agriculture: A Review
Liakos, K., Busato, P., Moshou, D., Pearson, S., & Bochtis, D. (2018) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s18082674 · Cited by 3,441
Self-citationAdvancing Biosensors with Machine Learning
Cui, F., Yue, Y., Zhang, Y., Zhang, Z., & Zhou, H. S. (2020) · ACS Sensors · doi:10.1021/acssensors.0c01424 · Cited by 768
Ayoub Shaikh, T., Rasool, T., & Rasheed Lone, F. (2022) · Computers and Electronics in Agriculture · doi:10.1016/j.compag.2022.107119 · Cited by 768
The digitization of agricultural industry – a systematic literature review on agriculture 4.0
Abbasi, R., Martinez, P., & Ahmad, R. (2022) · Smart Agricultural Technology · doi:10.1016/j.atech.2022.100042 · Cited by 531
Using deep learning to predict soil properties from regional spectral data
Padarian, J., Minasny, B., & McBratney, A. B. (2019) · Geoderma Regional · doi:10.1016/j.geodrs.2018.e00198 · Cited by 451
Metadata
- Authors
- Morellos, A., Pantazi, X.-E., Moshou, D., Alexandridis, T., Whetton, R., Tziotzios, G., Wiebensohn, J., Bill, R., & Mouazen, A. M.
- Venue
- Biosystems Engineering
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-12
- Volume
- 152
- Pages
- 104-116
- ISSN
- 1537-5110 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2399675776
- Cited by
- 489
- References
- 40
- FWCI
- 16.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Machine learning based prediction of soil total nitrogen, organic carbon and moisture content by using VIS-NIR spectroscopy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2016.04.018
- The paper
- Morellos, A., Pantazi, X.-E., Moshou, D., Alexandridis, T., Whetton, R., Tziotzios, G., Wiebensohn, J., Bill, R., & Mouazen, A. M. (2016). Machine learning based prediction of soil total nitrogen, organic carbon and moisture content by using VIS-NIR spectroscopy. Biosystems Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2016.04.018
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.