Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 613

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Immobilization of lipases on hydrophobic supports: immobilization mechanism, advantages, problems, and solutions

Open access
Rodrigues, Rafael C., Virgen-Ortíz, Jose J., dos Santos, José C.S., Berenguer-Murcia, Ángel, Alcantara, Andres R., Barbosa, Oveimar, Ortiz, Claudia, Fernandez-Lafuente, Roberto·2019·Biotechnology Advances

Abstract

Lipases are the most widely used enzymes in biocatalysis, and the most utilized method for enzyme immobilization is using hydrophobic supports at low ionic strength. This method allows the one step immobilization, purification, stabilization, and hyperactivation of lipases, and that is the main cause of their popularity. This review focuses on these lipase immobilization supports. First, the advantages of these supports for lipase immobilization will be presented and the likeliest immobilization mechanism (interfacial activation on the support surface) will be revised. Then, its main shortcoming will be discussed: enzyme desorption under certain conditions (such as high temperature, presence of cosolvents or detergent molecules). Methods to overcome this problem include physical or chemical crosslinking of the immobilized enzyme molecules or using heterofunctional supports. Thus, supports containing hydrophobic acyl chain plus epoxy, glutaraldehyde, ionic, vinylsulfone or glyoxyl groups have been designed. This prevents enzyme desorption and improved enzyme stability, but it may have some limitations, that will be discussed and some additional solutions will be proposed (e.g., chemical amination of the enzyme to have a full covalent enzyme-support reaction). These immobilized lipases may be subject to unfolding and refolding strategies to reactivate inactivated enzymes. Finally, these biocatalysts have been used in new strategies for enzyme coimmobilization, where the most stable enzyme could be reutilized after desorption of the least stable one after its inactivation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2019.04.003

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 613

Metadata

Authors
Rodrigues, R. C., Virgen-Ortíz, J. J., dos Santos, J. C. S., Berenguer-Murcia, Á., Alcantara, A. R., Barbosa, O., Ortiz, C., & Fernandez-Lafuente, R.
Venue
Biotechnology Advances
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-09
Volume
37
Issue
5
Pages
746-770
ISSN
0734-9750 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2940143329
Cited by
613
References
3
FWCI
23.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Immobilization of lipases on hydrophobic supports: immobilization mechanism, advantages, problems, and solutions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2019.04.003
The paper
Rodrigues, R. C., Virgen-Ortíz, J. J., dos Santos, J. C. S., Berenguer-Murcia, Á., Alcantara, A. R., Barbosa, O., Ortiz, C., & Fernandez-Lafuente, R. (2019). Immobilization of lipases on hydrophobic supports: immobilization mechanism, advantages, problems, and solutions. Biotechnology Advances. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2019.04.003

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.