The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Intraoperative hypotension and the risk of postoperative adverse outcomes: a systematic review
Open accessAbstract
Background: Intraoperative hypotension is a common side effect of general anaesthesia and might lead to inadequate organ perfusion. It is unclear to what extent hypotension during noncardiac surgery is associated with unfavourable outcomes. Methods: We conducted a systematic search in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and CINAHL, and classified the quality of retrieved articles according to predefined adapted STROBE and CONSORT criteria. Reported strengths of associations from high‐quality studies were classified into end‐organ specific injury risks, such as acute kidney injury, myocardial injury, and stroke, and overall organ injury risks for various arterial blood pressure thresholds. Results: We present an overview of 42 articles on reported associations between various absolute and relative intraoperative hypotension definitions and their associations with postoperative adverse outcomes after noncardiac surgery. Elevated risks of end‐organ injury were reported for prolonged exposure (≥10 min) to mean arterial pressures <80 mm Hg and for shorter durations <70 mm Hg. Reported risks increase with increased durations for mean arterial pressures <65–60 mm Hg or for any exposure <55–50 mm Hg. Conclusions: The reported associations suggest that organ injury might occur when mean arterial pressure decreases <80 mm Hg for ≥10 min, and that this risk increases with blood pressures becoming progressively lower. Given the retrospective observational design of the studies reviewed, reflected by large variability in patient characteristics, hypotension definitions and outcomes, solid conclusions on which blood pressures under which circumstances are truly too low cannot be drawn. We provide recommendations for the design of future studies. Clinical registration number: (PROSPERO ID). CRD42013005171.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
the CONSORT Group, Schulz, K. F., Altman, D. G., & Moher, D. (2010) · BMC Medicine · doi:10.1186/1741-7015-8-18 · Cited by 13,371
Cited by
Postoperative delirium: perioperative assessment, risk reduction, and management
Jin, Z., Hu, J., & Ma, D. (2020) · British Journal of Anaesthesia · doi:10.1016/j.bja.2020.06.063 · Cited by 697
Wijnberge, M., Geerts, B. F., Hol, L., Lemmers, N., Mulder, M. P., Berge, P., Schenk, J., Terwindt, L. E., Hollmann, M. W., Vlaar, A. P., et al. (2020) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2020.0592 · Cited by 586
Ostermann, M., Lumlertgul, N., Jeong, R., See, E., Joannidis, M., & James, M. (2025) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(24)02385-7 · Cited by 396
Fernandes, M. P. B., Armengol de la Hoz, M., Rangasamy, V., & Subramaniam, B. (2021) · Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia · doi:10.1053/j.jvca.2020.07.029 · Cited by 53
Czok, M., Pluta, M. P., Putowski, Z., & Krzych, Ł. J. (2021) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph18020786 · Cited by 40
Metadata
- Authors
- Wesselink, E. M., Kappen, T. H., Torn, H. M., Slooter, A. J. C., & van Klei, W. A.
- Venue
- British Journal of Anaesthesia
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-10
- Volume
- 121
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 706-721
- ISSN
- 0007-0912 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2809427753
- Cited by
- 896
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 14.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Intraoperative hypotension and the risk of postoperative adverse outcomes: a systematic review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.bja.2018.04.036
- The paper
- Wesselink, E. M., Kappen, T. H., Torn, H. M., Slooter, A. J. C., & van Klei, W. A. (2018). Intraoperative hypotension and the risk of postoperative adverse outcomes: a systematic review. British Journal of Anaesthesia. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2018.04.036
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.