Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 896

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Intraoperative hypotension and the risk of postoperative adverse outcomes: a systematic review

Open access
Wesselink, E.M., Kappen, T.H., Torn, H.M., Slooter, A.J.C., van Klei, W.A.·2018·British Journal of Anaesthesia

Abstract

Background: Intraoperative hypotension is a common side effect of general anaesthesia and might lead to inadequate organ perfusion. It is unclear to what extent hypotension during noncardiac surgery is associated with unfavourable outcomes. Methods: We conducted a systematic search in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and CINAHL, and classified the quality of retrieved articles according to predefined adapted STROBE and CONSORT criteria. Reported strengths of associations from high‐quality studies were classified into end‐organ specific injury risks, such as acute kidney injury, myocardial injury, and stroke, and overall organ injury risks for various arterial blood pressure thresholds. Results: We present an overview of 42 articles on reported associations between various absolute and relative intraoperative hypotension definitions and their associations with postoperative adverse outcomes after noncardiac surgery. Elevated risks of end‐organ injury were reported for prolonged exposure (≥10 min) to mean arterial pressures <80 mm Hg and for shorter durations <70 mm Hg. Reported risks increase with increased durations for mean arterial pressures <65–60 mm Hg or for any exposure <55–50 mm Hg. Conclusions: The reported associations suggest that organ injury might occur when mean arterial pressure decreases <80 mm Hg for ≥10 min, and that this risk increases with blood pressures becoming progressively lower. Given the retrospective observational design of the studies reviewed, reflected by large variability in patient characteristics, hypotension definitions and outcomes, solid conclusions on which blood pressures under which circumstances are truly too low cannot be drawn. We provide recommendations for the design of future studies. Clinical registration number: (PROSPERO ID). CRD42013005171.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bja.2018.04.036

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 896

Metadata

Authors
Wesselink, E. M., Kappen, T. H., Torn, H. M., Slooter, A. J. C., & van Klei, W. A.
Venue
British Journal of Anaesthesia
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-10
Volume
121
Issue
4
Pages
706-721
ISSN
0007-0912 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2809427753
Cited by
896
References
1
FWCI
14.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Intraoperative hypotension and the risk of postoperative adverse outcomes: a systematic review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.bja.2018.04.036
The paper
Wesselink, E. M., Kappen, T. H., Torn, H. M., Slooter, A. J. C., & van Klei, W. A. (2018). Intraoperative hypotension and the risk of postoperative adverse outcomes: a systematic review. British Journal of Anaesthesia. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2018.04.036

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.