The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Influence of perioperative anaesthetic and analgesic interventions on oncological outcomes: a narrative review
Open accessAbstract
Surgery is an important treatment modality for the majority of solid organ cancers. Unfortunately, cancer recurrence following surgery of curative intent is common, and typically results in refractory disease and patient death. Surgery and other perioperative interventions induce a biological state conducive to the survival and growth of residual cancer cells released from the primary tumour intraoperatively, which may influence the risk of a subsequent metastatic disease. Evidence is accumulating that anaesthetic and analgesic interventions could affect many of these pathophysiological processes, influencing risk of cancer recurrence in either a beneficial or detrimental way. Much of this evidence is from experimental in vitro and in vivo models, with clinical evidence largely limited to retrospective observational studies or post hoc analysis of RCTs originally designed to evaluate non-cancer outcomes. This narrative review summarises the current state of evidence regarding the potential effect of perioperative anaesthetic and analgesic interventions on cancer biology and clinical outcomes. Proving a causal link will require data from prospective RCTs with oncological outcomes as primary endpoints, a number of which will report in the coming years. Until then, there is insufficient evidence to recommend any particular anaesthetic or analgesic technique for patients undergoing tumour resection surgery on the basis that it might alter the risk of recurrence or metastasis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bray, F., Ferlay, J., Soerjomataram, I., Siegel, R. L., Torre, L. A., & Jemal, A. (2018) · CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/caac.21492 · Cited by 84,109
Molecular mechanisms of epithelial–mesenchymal transition
Lamouille, S., Xu, J., & Derynck, R. (2014) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm3758 · Cited by 8,091
Origin and physiological roles of inflammation
Medzhitov, R. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07201 · Cited by 6,618
Hypoxia-Inducible Factors: Master Regulators of Cancer Progression
Schito, L., & Semenza, G. L. (2016) · Trends in Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.trecan.2016.10.016 · Cited by 962
Sympathetic nervous system regulation of the tumour microenvironment
Cole, S. W., Nagaraja, A. S., Lutgendorf, S. K., Green, P. A., & Sood, A. K. (2015) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc3978 · Cited by 576 · cited 1×
“The mechanism is unclear: it may be due to increased activity of both the SNS and the HPA axis, with the subsequent increase in circulating catecholamines and glucocorticoids attenuating the activity of immune cells.(131) Clinically, poorly controlled pain or increased opioid requirements have retrospectively been ass…”
BackgroundPerioperative events influence cancer recurrence risk after surgery
Hiller, J. G., Perry, N. J., Poulogiannis, G., Riedel, B., & Sloan, E. K. (2018) · Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1038/nrclinonc.2017.194 · Cited by 556 · cited 3×
“Activation of the HPA axis stimulates the release of cortisol and catecholaminesdthese humoral factors not only inhibit the proliferation and antitumour activity of NK cells and CD8þ T cells, but also promote the proliferation of regulatory T cells (Tregs) and Type 2 helper T cells (Th2), which have pro-tumour effects…”
BackgroundHuang, H., Benzonana, L. L., Zhao, H., Watts, H. R., Perry, N. J. S., Bevan, C., Brown, R., & Ma, D. (2014) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1038/bjc.2014.426 · Cited by 223
Self-citation
Cited by
Recurrence of breast cancer after regional or general anaesthesia: a randomised controlled trial
Sessler, D. I., Pei, L., Huang, Y., Fleischmann, E., Marhofer, P., Kurz, A., Mayers, D. B., Meyer-Treschan, T. A., Grady, M., Tan, E. Y., et al. (2019) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(19)32313-x · Cited by 409
Self-citationAnaesthesia, analgesia, and the surgical stress response
Cusack, B., & Buggy, D. J. (2020) · BJA Education · doi:10.1016/j.bjae.2020.04.006 · Cited by 266
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Wall, T., Sherwin, A., Ma, D., & Buggy, D. J.
- Venue
- British Journal of Anaesthesia
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-08
- Volume
- 123
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 135-150
- ISSN
- 0007-0912 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2954607948
- Cited by
- 215
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 7.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Influence of perioperative anaesthetic and analgesic interventions on oncological outcomes: a narrative review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.bja.2019.04.062
- The paper
- Wall, T., Sherwin, A., Ma, D., & Buggy, D. J. (2019). Influence of perioperative anaesthetic and analgesic interventions on oncological outcomes: a narrative review. British Journal of Anaesthesia. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2019.04.062
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.