Cited by 81Body Image and Dysmorphia StudiesReconstructive Facial Surgery TechniquesDermatologic Treatments and Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Meeting the psychological needs of patients with facial disfigurement

Bradbury, Eileen·2012·British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

Abstract

Those with congenital or acquired disfigurement are faced with the challenges of social reactions and their own psychological responses to looking different. There is no simple linear relation between the degree of disfigurement and the degree of experienced distress. Factors that influence an individual's ability to cope include the social meaning of the disfigurement, life history, social and family support, and developmental stage. Decision-making about surgery, including that for those seeking aesthetic surgery, should take account of these complex factors to understand the patient's needs, ensure informed consent, and avoid unnecessary or ill-timed surgery. All those working with patients with disfigurement should have an understanding of their psychosocial needs, and there should be access to an identified member of staff such as a clinical nurse specialist with counselling skills, and a recognised referral route to a psychologist or liaison psychiatrist.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bjoms.2010.11.022

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Bradbury, 1993, Psychological approaches to children and adolescents with disfigurement, ACPP Rev Newslett, 15, 1

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Bradbury, E.
Affiliations
Alexandra Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Bradbury, Eileen
Venue
British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-04
Volume
50
Issue
3
Pages
193-196
ISSN
0266-4356 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2018202930
Cited by
81
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Dermatologic Treatments and Research
Keywords
facial disfigurement, psychological distress, psychosocial needs, coping, social stigma, informed consent, social support, clinical nurse specialists, psychological referral
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Child, Child Development, Counseling, Facial Injuries, Family, Female, Health Services Needs and Demand, Humans, Informed Consent, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Patient Care Team, Referral and Consultation, Self Concept, Sex Factors, Social Adjustment, Social Behavior, Social Environment, Social Support, Stress, Psychological, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Craniofacial Abnormalities, Plastic Surgery Procedures, Adolescent Development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review