CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 22

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Dog bites and maxillofacial surgery: what can we do?

Mannion, C.J., Graham, A., Shepherd, K., Greenberg, D.·2015·British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
DOI 10.1016/j.bjoms.2015.02.022
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The number of injuries caused by dog bites is increasing in the United Kingdom. We review patients admitted with dog bites to a single maxillofacial department in a district general hospital over a 21-month period. Data include patients' characteristics, and the site and severity of injury. The relationship of the victim to the animal and its breed and classification were added where possible. In total, 65 patients, mean age 22 years (range 1-71, median 14) were included. There were 84 wounds, and their site and severity were recorded according to the Lackmann classification. Twelve different breeds of dog were responsible for the bites. An appreciable proportion of those injured were young children. Educational strategies should aim to reduce the incidence of all dog bites, particularly in young children, as their needs after initial treatment are complex. We propose specific strategies to reduce the number of these injuries.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bjoms.2015.02.022

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 20

  1. Lackmann, 1992, Surgical treatment of facial dog bite injuries in children, J Craniomaxillofac Surg, 20, 81, 10.1016/S1010-5182(05)80472-X · DOI
  2. Mannion, 2013, Injuries sustained by dog bites, Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 51, 368, 10.1016/j.bjoms.2013.02.004 · DOI
  3. Palmer, 1983, Dog bites of the face: a 15 year review, Br J Plast Surg, 36, 315, 10.1016/0007-1226(83)90051-6 · DOI
  4. Overall, 2001, Dog bites to humans – demography, epidemiology, injury, and risk, J Am Vet Med Assoc, 218, 1923, 10.2460/javma.2001.218.1923 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Reisner, 2011, Behavioural characteristics associated with dog bites to children presenting to an urban trauma centre, Inj Prev, 17, 348, 10.1136/ip.2010.029868 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Dixon, 2012, Dog bite prevention: an assessment of child knowledge, J Pediatr, 160, 337, 10.1016/j.jpeds.2011.07.016 · DOI
  7. Cameron, 2009, Differing views on the cause of aggression in dogs, J Am Vet Med Assoc, 234, 39
  8. Dixon, 2013, An evaluation of a dog bite prevention intervention in the pediatric emergency department, J Trauma Acute Care Surg, 75, S308, 10.1097/TA.0b013e31829be2bc · DOI
  9. Chapman, 2000, Preventing dog bites in children: randomized controlled trial of an educational intervention, BMJ, 320, 1512, 10.1136/bmj.320.7248.1512 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Frangakis, 2003, Modelling risk factors for injuries from dog bites in Greece: a case-only design and analysis, Accid Anal Prev, 35, 435, 10.1016/S0001-4575(02)00015-5 · DOI
  11. Bernado, 2000, Dog bites in children treated in a pediatric emergency department, J Soc Pediatr Nurs, 5, 87, 10.1111/j.1744-6155.2000.tb00090.x · DOI
  12. Avner, 1991, Dog bites in urban children, Pediatrics, 88, 55, 10.1542/peds.88.1.55 · DOI
  13. Ledger, 2005, Breeds specific legislation: considerations for evaluating its effectiveness and recommendations for alternatives, Can Vet J, 46, 735
  14. Villalbi, 2010, Decline in hospitalisations due to dog bite injuries in Catalonia, 1997–2008. An effect on government regulation?, Inj Prev, 16, 408, 10.1136/ip.2010.026997 · DOI
  15. Cornelissen, 2010, Dog bites in The Netherlands: a study of victims, injuries, circumstances and aggressors to support evaluation of breed specific legislation, Vet J, 186, 292, 10.1016/j.tvjl.2009.10.001 · DOI · Paper page
  16. De Keuster, 2006, Epidemiology of dog bites: a Belgian experience of canine behaviour and public health concerns, Vet J, 172, 482, 10.1016/j.tvjl.2005.04.024 · DOI
  17. Casey, 2014, Human directed aggression in domestic dogs (Canis familiaris): occurrence in different contexts and risk factors, Appl Anim Behav Sci, 152, 52, 10.1016/j.applanim.2013.12.003 · DOI
  18. Shepherd, 2013, Teaching dog owners new tricks, Vet Rec, 172, 583, 10.1136/vr.f3355 · DOI
  19. Bini, 2011, Mortality, mauling and maiming by vicious dogs, Ann Surg, 253, 791, 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318211cd68 · DOI
  20. Mannion, 2014, One health approach to dog bite prevention, Vet Rec, 174, 151, 10.1136/vr.g1371 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 22

Metadata

Authors
Mannion, C. J., Graham, A., Shepherd, K., & Greenberg, D.
Venue
British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-07
Volume
53
Issue
6
Pages
522-525
ISSN
0266-4356
DOI
10.1016/j.bjoms.2015.02.022
Cited by
22
References
0
Language
en
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review