The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Evaluation of the antimicrobial activity of chitosan and its quaternized derivative on E. coli and S. aureus growth
Open accessAbstract
Chitosan is largely known for its activity against a wide range of microorganisms, in which the most acceptable antimicrobial mechanism is found to include the presence of charged groups in the polymer backbone and their ionic interactions with bacteria wall constituents. This interaction suggests the occurrence of a hydrolysis of the peptidoglycans in the microorganism wall, provoking the leakage of intracellular electrolytes, leading the microorganism to death. The charges present in chitosan chains are generated by protonation of amino groups when in acid medium or they may be introduced via structural modification. This latter can be achieved by a methylation reaction resulting in a quaternized derivative with a higher polymeric charge density. Since the charges in this derivative are permanents, it is expected a most efficient antimicrobial activity. Hence, in the present study, commercial chitosan underwent quaternization processes and both (mother polymer and derivative) were evaluated, in gel form, against Staphylococcus aureus (Gram-positive) and Escherichia coli (Gram-negative), as model bacteria. The results, as acquired from turbidity measurements, differ between materials with an expressive reduction on the Gram-positive microorganism (S. aureus) growth, while E. coli (Gram-negative) strain was less sensitive to both polymers. Additionally, the antibacterial effectiveness of chitosan was strongly dependent on the concentration, what is discussed in terms of spatial polymer conformation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Recent advances on antimicrobial wound dressing: A review
Simões, D., Miguel, S. P., Ribeiro, M. P., Coutinho, P., Mendonça, A. G., & Correia, I. J. (2018) · European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics · doi:10.1016/j.ejpb.2018.02.022 · Cited by 935
Chitosan as a Wound Dressing Starting Material: Antimicrobial Properties and Mode of Action
Matica, M. A., Aachmann, F. L., Tøndervik, A., Sletta, H., & Ostafe, V. (2019) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms20235889 · Cited by 818
Current state of chitin purification and chitosan production from insects
Hahn, T., Tafi, E., Paul, A., Salvia, R., Falabella, P., & Zibek, S. (2020) · Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology · doi:10.1002/jctb.6533 · Cited by 373
Cu-chitosan nanoparticle boost defense responses and plant growth in maize (Zea mays L.)
Choudhary, R. C., Kumaraswamy, R. V., Kumari, S., Sharma, S. S., Pal, A., Raliya, R., Biswas, P., & Saharan, V. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-017-08571-0 · Cited by 367
Kim, S. (2018) · International Journal of Polymer Science · doi:10.1155/2018/1708172 · Cited by 298
Metadata
- Authors
- Goy, R. C., Morais, S. T. B., & Assis, O. B. G.
- Venue
- Revista Brasileira de Farmacognosia
- Published
- 2016-01
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 122-127
- ISSN
- 0102-695X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2178468384
- Cited by
- 529
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evaluation of the antimicrobial activity of chitosan and its quaternized derivative on E. coli and S. aureus growth. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.bjp.2015.09.010
- The paper
- Goy, R. C., Morais, S. T. B., & Assis, O. B. G. (2016). Evaluation of the antimicrobial activity of chitosan and its quaternized derivative on E. coli and S. aureus growth. Revista Brasileira de Farmacognosia. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjp.2015.09.010
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.