Predicting body appreciation in young women: An integrated model of positive body image
Abstract
This study examined a range of predictors, based on previous theoretical models, of positive body image in young adult women. Participants were 266 women who completed an online questionnaire measuring body appreciation, activity participation, media consumption, perceived body acceptance by others, self-compassion, and autonomy. Potential mechanisms in predicting body appreciation assessed were self-objectification, social appearance comparison, and thin-ideal internalisation. Results indicated that greater perceived body acceptance by others and self-compassion, and lower appearance media consumption, self-objectification, social comparison, and thin-ideal internalisation were related to greater body appreciation. An integrated model showed that appearance media (negatively) and non-appearance media and self-compassion (positively) were associated with lower self-objectification, social comparison, and thin-ideal internalisation, which in turn related to greater body appreciation. Additionally, perceived body acceptance by others was directly associated with body appreciation. The results contribute to an understanding of potential pathways of positive body image development, thereby highlighting possible intervention targets.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The amount of time spent on SNS was associated with greater body-objectification.
“In this regard, recent studies reported that the amount of time spent on SNS was associated with greater body-objectification (Andrew, Tiggemann, & Clark, 2016; Barzoki, Mohtasham, Shahidi, & Tavakol, 2017; Graff & Czarnomska, 2019; Melioli, Rodgers, Rodrigues, & Chabrol, 2015; Slater, & Tiggemann, 2015; Vandenbosch & Eggermont, 2012, 2015).”
From Adolescents’ Body Shame and Social Networking Sites: The Mediating Effect of Body Image Control in Photos (2020) · cites this paper as Andrew, Tiggemann, & Clark, 2016
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 80 · Cited by 136
- Authors
- Andrew, R., Tiggemann, M., & Clark, L.
- Affiliations
- Flinders University (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Tiggemann, Marika
- ORCID
- Tiggemann, Marika
- Venue
- Body Image
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-09
- Volume
- 18
- Pages
- 34-42
- ISSN
- 1740-1445 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2404635710
- Cited by
- 136
- References
- 80
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3
- FWCI
- 12.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Body Image (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
- Keywords
- body appreciation, positive body image, young women, self-objectification, thin-ideal internalization, self-compassion, autonomy, activities and participation, body image development
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Body Image, Empathy, Female, Humans, Models, Psychological, Self Concept, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review