Cited by 136Eating Disorders and BehaviorsBody Image and Dysmorphia StudiesMotivation and Self-Concept in Sports

Predicting body appreciation in young women: An integrated model of positive body image

Andrew, Rachel, Tiggemann, Marika, Clark, Levina·2016·Body Image

Abstract

This study examined a range of predictors, based on previous theoretical models, of positive body image in young adult women. Participants were 266 women who completed an online questionnaire measuring body appreciation, activity participation, media consumption, perceived body acceptance by others, self-compassion, and autonomy. Potential mechanisms in predicting body appreciation assessed were self-objectification, social appearance comparison, and thin-ideal internalisation. Results indicated that greater perceived body acceptance by others and self-compassion, and lower appearance media consumption, self-objectification, social comparison, and thin-ideal internalisation were related to greater body appreciation. An integrated model showed that appearance media (negatively) and non-appearance media and self-compassion (positively) were associated with lower self-objectification, social comparison, and thin-ideal internalisation, which in turn related to greater body appreciation. Additionally, perceived body acceptance by others was directly associated with body appreciation. The results contribute to an understanding of potential pathways of positive body image development, thereby highlighting possible intervention targets.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bodyim.2016.04.003

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The amount of time spent on SNS was associated with greater body-objectification.

    “In this regard, recent studies reported that the amount of time spent on SNS was associated with greater body-objectification (Andrew, Tiggemann, & Clark, 2016; Barzoki, Mohtasham, Shahidi, & Tavakol, 2017; Graff & Czarnomska, 2019; Melioli, Rodgers, Rodrigues, & Chabrol, 2015; Slater, & Tiggemann, 2015; Vandenbosch & Eggermont, 2012, 2015).”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 80 · Cited by 136

Authors
Andrew, R., Tiggemann, M., & Clark, L.
Affiliations
Flinders University (AU)
Corresponding author
Tiggemann, Marika
Venue
Body Image
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-09
Volume
18
Pages
34-42
ISSN
1740-1445 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2404635710
Cited by
136
References
80
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3
FWCI
12.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Body Image (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
Keywords
body appreciation, positive body image, young women, self-objectification, thin-ideal internalization, self-compassion, autonomy, activities and participation, body image development
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Body Image, Empathy, Female, Humans, Models, Psychological, Self Concept, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review