Cited by 46Body Image and Dysmorphia StudiesMental Health Treatment and AccessDermatologic Treatments and Research

The provision of specialist psychosocial support for people with visible differences: A European survey

Open access
Harcourt, Diana, Hamlet, Claire, Feragen, Kristin Billaud, Garcia-Lopez, Luis-Joaquin, Masnari, Ornella, Mendes, Jose, Nobile, Francesca, Okkerse, Jolanda +4 more·2018·Body Image

Abstract

A substantial body of research has demonstrated the challenges commonly facing people with visible differences (disfigurements) and explored the potential benefits offered by specialist psychosocial support and intervention for those who are negatively affected. However, little is known about the availability of such support in Europe for people whose appearance is in any way different to 'the norm'. This survey of 116 psychosocial specialists from 15 European countries, working with a range of patient groups, has shown a tendency for specialists to prioritise Cognitive-behavioural-based approaches, amongst a wide range of other approaches and interventional techniques. It indicates variations in the availability of support, and a perceived need for improved access to interventions, additional training, and greater awareness of the psychosocial issues associated with visible differences.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bodyim.2018.02.001

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Minimal specialist psychological provision is available across Europe.

    “With minimal specialist psychological provision available (eg, across Europe [9]), the development and testing of specialist self-help interventions are warranted.”

    From An Acceptance and Commitment Therapy Prototype Mobile Program for Individuals with a Visible Difference: Mixed Methods Feasibility Study (2022) · cites this paper as [9]

    The Conclusions (section 5; page not provided) report disparities in availability and a need to increase access to specialist support for people with visible differences. But the Results (section 3.3; page not provided) say more than half of respondents considered access easy in both inpatient and outpatient settings. The paper supports gaps in provision, not the unqualified description of provision across Europe as minimal. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Zucchelli, F., Donnelly, O., Williamson, H., & Hooper, N. (2017). Acceptance and commitment therapy for people experiencing appearance-related distress associated with a visible difference: A rationale and review of relevant literature. [submitted for publication].

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Harcourt, D., Hamlet, C., Feragen, K. B., Garcia-Lopez, L.-J., Masnari, O., Mendes, J., Nobile, F., Okkerse, J., Pittermann, A., Spillekom-van Koulil, S., Stock, N. M., & Williamson, H.
Affiliations
  • University of the West of England (GB)
  • Oslo University Hospital (NO)
  • University Children's Hospital Zurich (CH)
  • Erasmus MC - Sophia Children’s Hospital (NL)
  • Vienna General Hospital (AT)
Corresponding author
Harcourt, Diana
Venue
Body Image
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-06
Volume
25
Pages
35-39
ISSN
1740-1445 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2787786759
Cited by
46
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5
FWCI
6.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Body Image (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • UWE Research Repository (UWE Bristol) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • RePub (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Funders
  • COST (European Cooperation in Science and Technology) programme
  • EU Framework Programme Horizon 2020
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Dermatologic Treatments and Research
Keywords
visible difference, disfigurement, psychosocial support, cognitive-behavioral approach, access to interventions, training needs
MeSH terms
Adult, Body Image, Burns, Europe, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review