CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 215Eating Disorders and BehaviorsBody Image and Dysmorphia StudiesImpact of Technology on Adolescents

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 80 of the 80 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Social media, body satisfaction and well-being among adolescents: A mediation model of appearance-ideal internalization and comparison.

Open access
Jarman, Hannah K., Marques, Mathew D., McLean, Siân A., Slater, Amy, Paxton, Susan J.·2021·Body Image
DOI 10.1016/j.bodyim.2020.11.005
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Despite adolescents' prolific use of social media, relationships between social media and body satisfaction and well-being are not yet well understood, especially among boys. This study tested a sociocultural model of body image within the context of social media among adolescent boys and girls. Specifically, this study examined whether appearance-ideal internalization and social appearance comparisons mediated relationships between social media engagement (intensity and appearance-focused use) and body satisfaction and subjective well-being. Australian adolescents between 11 and 17 years (N = 1,579, M age = 13.45 years, SD = 1.15; 55.4 % boys) completed an online survey. Structural equational modelling indicated that only higher appearance-focused social media use was directly associated with lower body satisfaction and well-being. Generally, higher appearance-ideal internalization and comparisons mediated the relationships between higher social media engagement and lower body satisfaction and well-being. Multi-group analyses indicated these relationships were equivalent across gender. Findings supported the proposed model among boys and girls and extend existing theoretical knowledge to encompass male body image and well-being. Interventions which target internalization and comparisons in the context of social media are likely to be valuable in improving body satisfaction and subjective well-being in co-educational settings.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bodyim.2020.11.005

Cites

80 of 80 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 80 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 215

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Jarman, H. K., Marques, M. D., McLean, S. A., Slater, A., & Paxton, S. J.
Affiliations
  • La Trobe University (AU)
  • University of the West of England (GB)
Corresponding author
Jarman, Hannah K.
ORCID
Venue
Body Image
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-03
Volume
36
Pages
139-148
ISSN
1740-1445 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.bodyim.2020.11.005
OpenAlex
W3109038096
Cited by
214
References
80
Citations by year
2026: 37 · 2025: 54 · 2024: 47 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 16
FWCI
7.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Body Image (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UWE Research Repository (UWE Bristol) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • La Trobe University
Funders
Australian Research Council
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
Keywords
social media use, body satisfaction, subjective well-being, adolescent boys, adolescent girls, gender differences
MeSH terms
Adolescent Health, Social Comparison, Adolescent, Australia, Body Image, Child, Defense Mechanisms, Female, Humans, Male, Models, Psychological, Personal Satisfaction, Surveys and Questionnaires, Social Media

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review