Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 378

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Non-invasive axial loading of mouse tibiae increases cortical bone formation and modifies trabecular organization: A new model to study cortical and cancellous compartments in a single loaded element

De Souza, Roberto L., Matsuura, Maiko, Eckstein, Felix, Rawlinson, Simon C.F., Lanyon, Lance E., Pitsillides, Andrew A.·2005·Bone

Abstract

Systematic study of bones' responses to loading requires simple non-invasive models in appropriate experimental animals where the applied load is controllable and the changes in bone quantifiable. Herein, we validate a model for applying axial loads, non-invasively to murine tibiae. This allows the effects of mechanical loading in both cancellous and cortical bone to be determined within a single bone in which genetic, neuronal and functional influences can also be readily manipulated. Using female C57Bl/J6 mice, peak strains at the tibial mid-shaft were measured during walking (<300 micro epsilon tension) and jumping (<600 micro epsilon compression) with single longitudinally oriented strain gauges attached to the bone's lateral and medial surfaces. Identically positioned gauges were also used to determine, for calibration, the strains engendered by external applied compressive tibial loading between the flexed knee and ankle ex vivo. Applied loads between 5 and 13 N produced strains of 1150-2000 micro epsilon on the lateral surface, and in vivo repetitions of these loads on alternate days for 2 weeks produced significant load magnitude-related increases in cortical bone formation that were similar in mice at 8, 12 and 20 weeks of age. Micro-CT scans showed that loading significantly increases trabecular bone volume in 8 week old mice, but modifies trabecular organization with decreases in trabecular bone volume in 12 and 20 week old mice. This model for loading the tibia has several advantages over other approaches, including scope to study the effects of loading in cancellous as well as cortical bone, against a background of either disuse or of treatment with osteotropic agents within a single bone in normal, mutant and transgenic mice.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bone.2005.07.022

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 378

Metadata

Authors
De Souza, R. L., Matsuura, M., Eckstein, F., Rawlinson, S. C. F., Lanyon, L. E., & Pitsillides, A. A.
Venue
Bone
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-12
Volume
37
Issue
6
Pages
810-818
ISSN
  • 1873-2763 (ISSN-L)
  • 8756-3282
OpenAlex
W2025398368
Cited by
378
References
1
FWCI
6.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.