Body composition, volumetric and areal bone parameters in male-to-female transsexual persons
Abstract
Context Male-to-female (M-->F) transsexual persons undergo extreme changes in gonadal hormone concentrations, both by pharmacological and surgical interventions. Given the importance of sex steroids for developing and maintaining bone mass, bone health is a matter of concern in daily management of these patients.Objective To provide data on bone metabolism, geometry and volumetric bone mineral density in M-->F transsexual persons.Design/setting/participants Twenty-three M-->F transsexual persons, recruited from our gender dysphoria clinic and at least 3 yrs after sex reassignment surgery, together with 46 healthy age- and height-matched control men were included in this cross-sectional study.Main outcome measures Body composition, areal and volumetric bone parameters determined using DXA and peripheral quantitative computed tomography. Hormone levels and markers of bone metabolism assessed using immunoassays. Peak torque of biceps and quadriceps muscles and grip strength assessed using an isokinetic and hand dynamometer, respectively.Results M-->F transsexual persons presented lower total and regional muscle mass and lower muscle strength as compared to controls (all P<0.001). In addition, they had higher total and regional fat mass (P<0.010) and a lower level of sports-related activity index (P<0.010). Bone mineral content and areal density (aBMD) of the lumbar spine, total hip and distal radius, as well as trabecular vBMD of the distal radius was lower as compared to controls (P<0.010). At cortical sites, no differences in cortical vBMD were observed, whereas M-->F transsexual persons were characterized by smaller cortical bone size at both the radius and tibia (P<0.010). Lower levels of biochemical markers of bone formation and resorption (P<0.010) suggested decreased bone turnover.Conclusion M-->F transsexual persons have less lean mass and muscle strength, and higher fat mass. In addition, they present lower trabecular vBMD and aBMD at the lumbar spine, total hip and distal radius, and smaller cortical bone size as compared to matched controls. Both the lower level of sports-related physical activity as well testosterone deprivation could contribute to these findings. These results indicate that bone health should be a parameter of interest in the long-term follow-up care for M-->F transsexual persons.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The third cross-sectional study compared transwomen who had undergone at least 48 months of GAHT with cisgender men and reported 17% lower lean body mass in transwomen than in cisgender men.
“The third cross-sectional study compared transwomen who had undergone at least 48 months of GAHT with cisgender men54 and reported 17% lower LBM in transwomen than in cisgender men.”
Three cross-sectional studies reported that transwomen had 6.4% and 8.0% lower lean body mass than cisgender men and reductions of 4% in lean body mass in transwomen with 12 months of GAHT.
“These studies reported 6.4% and 8.0% lower LBM than in cisgender men and reductions of 4% in LBM in the transwomen with 12 months of GAHT.”
Transwomen who had all undergone at least 48 months of GAHT had 24% smaller cross-sectional area than cisgender men.
“The transwomen in the second study had all undergone at least 48 months of GAHT54 and had 24% smaller CSA than cisgender men.”
Another cross-sectional study found 24% lower hand grip and quadriceps strength in transwomen than in cisgender men after 48 months or more on GAHT (p<0.001).
“The other study54 found 24% lower hand grip and quadriceps strength in transwomen than in cisgender men after 48 months or more on GAHT (p<0.001).”
Two cross-sectional studies found that transwomen on GAHT for 6 or 48 months had lower (10%) HCT than cisgender men (p<0.005).
“Two studies found that transwomen on GAHT for 6 or 48 months had lower (10%) HCT than cisgender men53 54 (p<0.005)”
Transgender women had 17% less lean mass and 25% lower peak quadriceps muscle strength than control males after a mean 8 years of cross-hormone treatment.
“The results showed that transgender women had 17% less lean mass and 25% lower peak quadriceps muscle strength than the control males [78].”
From Transgender Women in the Female Category of Sport: Perspectives on Testosterone Suppression and Performance Advantage (2021) · cites this paper as [78]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 34 · Cited by 131
- Authors
- Lapauw, B., Taes, Y., Simoens, S., Van Caenegem, E., Weyers, S., Goemaere, S., Toye, K., Kaufman, J.-M., & T'Sjoen, G. G.
- Affiliations
- Ghent University Hospital (BE)
- Corresponding author
- T'Sjoen, Guy G.
- Venue
- Bone
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-12
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1016-1021
- ISSN
- 1873-2763 (ISSN-L)
- 8756-3282
- OpenAlex
- W2098935287
- Cited by
- 131
- References
- 34
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 2.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Bone (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Bone health and osteoporosis research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › HIV-related health complications and treatments
- Keywords
- male-to-female transsexuals, bone mineral density, body composition, muscle mass, fat mass, trabecular bone, bone turnover markers, gender-affirming surgery, physical activity, bone health, sex steroids
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Body Composition, Bone and Bones, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Hormones, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Transsexualism, Absorptiometry, Photon, Bone Density, Case-Control Studies
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review