Cited by 130Bone Tissue Engineering MaterialsSurface Treatment and CoatingsAnatomy and Medical Technology

Development and application of hydroxyapatite-based scaffolds for bone tissue regeneration: A systematic literature review

Fendi, Fendi, Abdullah, Bualkar, Suryani, Sri, Usman, Andi Nilawati, Tahir, Dahlang·2024·Bone

Abstract

Hydroxyapatite [HA, Ca 10(PO 4)6(OH)2], with its robust biocompatibility and bioactivity, has found extensive utility in bone grafting, replacement therapies, and supplemental medical materials. HA is highly regarded for its osteoconductive properties because it boasts hydrophilicity, nontoxicity, non-allergenicity, and non-mutagenicity. Nevertheless, HA's intrinsic mechanical weakness has spurred efforts to enhance its properties. This enhancement is achieved through ion incorporation, with elements such as magnesium, zinc, lithium, strontium, boron, and others being integrated into the HA structure. In the domain of orthopedics, HA-based scaffolds have emerged as a solution for addressing prevalent issues like bone deformities and defects stemming from congenital anomalies, injuries, trauma, infections, or tumors. The fabrication of three-dimensional scaffolds (3D scaffolds) has enabled advancements in bone regeneration and replacement, with a focus on practical applications such as repairing calvarial, skull, and femoral defects. In vitro and in vivo assessments have substantiated the effectiveness of 3D scaffolds for bone defect repair, regeneration, and tissue engineering. Beyond bone-related applications, scaffolds demonstrate versatility in enhancing cartilage healing and serving as bioimplants. The wide array of scaffold applications underscores their ongoing potential for further development in the realm of medical science.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bone.2024.117075

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For bone repair biomaterials, it is necessary to have high mechanical strength similar to normal bone tissue, provide sufficient support for bone tissue on both sides of defect, give certain mechanical stimulation to bone tissue at broken end, promote bone formation and bone repair, and have suitable degradation time to match speed of bone regeneration and repair and new bone formation.

    “For bone repair biomaterials, it is necessary to have a high mechanical strength similar to normal bone tissue, to provide sufficient support for bone tissue on both sides of the defect, and to give certain mechanical stimulation to bone tissue at the broken end, to promote bone formation and bone repair, and to have a suitable degradation time to match the speed of bone regeneration and repair”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 103 · Cited by 130

Authors
Fendi, F., Abdullah, B., Suryani, S., Usman, A. N., & Tahir, D.
Affiliations
Hasanuddin University (ID)
Corresponding author
Tahir, Dahlang
Venue
Bone
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-06
Volume
183
Pages
117075
ISSN
  • 1873-2763 (ISSN-L)
  • 8756-3282
OpenAlex
W4392919486
Cited by
130
References
103
Citations by year
2026: 48 · 2025: 59 · 2024: 23
FWCI
4.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Bone (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Surface Treatment and Coatings
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Anatomy and Medical Technology
Keywords
hydroxyapatite, bone tissue engineering, bone scaffolds, bone regeneration, bone defects, 3D scaffolds, osteoconduction, cartilage repair, bioimplants, bone grafting
MeSH terms
Animals, Bone and Bones, Bone Regeneration, Humans, Skull, Durapatite, Tissue Engineering, Tissue Scaffolds

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review