The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 57 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening – An overview
Open accessAbstract
There are several modalities available for a colorectal cancer (CRC) screening program. When determining which CRC screening program to implement, the costs of such programs should be considered in comparison to the health benefits they are expected to provide. Cost-effectiveness analysis provides a tool to do this. In this paper we review the evidence on the cost-effectiveness of CRC screening. Published studies universally indicate that when compared with no CRC screening, all screening modalities provide additional years of life at a cost that is deemed acceptable by most industrialized nations. Many recent studies even find CRC screening to be cost-saving. However, when the alternative CRC screening strategies are compared against each other in an incremental cost-effectiveness analysis, no single optimal strategy emerges across the studies. There is consensus that the new technologies of stool DNA testing, computed tomographic colonography and capsule endoscopy are not yet cost-effective compared with the established CRC screening tests.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975-2003
Ries, L. A. G., Harkins, D., Krapcho, M. F., Mariotto, A. B., Miller, B., Feuer, E. J., Clegg, L. X., Eisner, M. P., Horner, M., Howlader, N., et al. (2006) · Digital Archive @ GSU · Cited by 11,403
Reducing Mortality from Colorectal Cancer by Screening for Fecal Occult Blood
Mandel, J. S., Bond, J. H., Church, T. R., Snover, D. C., Bradley, G. M., Schuman, L. M., & Ederer, F. (1993) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199305133281901 · Cited by 3,229
Levin, B., Lieberman, D. A., McFarland, B., Andrews, K. S., Brooks, D., Bond, J., Dash, C., Giardiello, F. M., Glick, S., Johnson, D., et al. (2008) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2008.02.002 · Cited by 2,990
Randomised controlled trial of faecal-occult-blood screening for colorectal cancer
Hardcastle, J. D., Chamberlain, J. O., Robinson, M. H., Moss, S. M., Amar, S. S., Balfour, T. W., James, P. D., & Mangham, C. M. (1996) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(96)03386-7 · Cited by 2,793
Randomised study of screening for colorectal cancer with faecal-occult-blood test
Kronborg, O., Fenger, C., Olsen, J., Jørgensen, O. D., & Søndergaard, O. (1996) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(96)03430-7 · Cited by 2,501
Screening for Colorectal Cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement
U.S. Preventive Services Task Force* (2008) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-149-9-200811040-00243 · Cited by 1,959
Colorectal cancer screening: Clinical guidelines and rationale
Winawer, S., Fletcher, R., Miller, L., Godlee, F., Stolar, M., Mulrow, C., Woolf, S., Glick, S., Ganiats, T., Bond, J., et al. (1997) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/gast.1997.v112.agast970594 · Cited by 1,612
Screening for Colorectal Cancer
Eddy, D. M. (1990) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-113-5-373 · Cited by 1,200
Whitlock, E. P., Lin, J. S., Liles, E., Beil, T. L., & Fu, R. (2008) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-149-9-200811040-00245 · Cited by 845
[Principles and practice of mass screening for disease].
Wilson, J. M., & Jungner, Y. G. (1968) · PubMed · Cited by 808
Cited by
Artificial Intelligence Allows Leaving-In-Situ Colorectal Polyps
Hassan, C., Balsamo, G., Lorenzetti, R., Zullo, A., & Antonelli, G. (2022) · Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2022.04.045 · Cited by 119
Metadata
- Authors
- Lansdorp-Vogelaar, I., Knudsen, A. B., & Brenner, H.
- Venue
- Best Practice & Research Clinical Gastroenterology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-08
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 439-449
- ISSN
- 1521-6918 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2018449686
- Cited by
- 438
- References
- 57
- FWCI
- 18.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening – An overview. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.bpg.2010.04.004
- The paper
- Lansdorp-Vogelaar, I., Knudsen, A. B., & Brenner, H. (2010). Cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening – An overview. Best Practice & Research Clinical Gastroenterology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpg.2010.04.004
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
