Cited by 119Colorectal Cancer Screening and DetectionAI in cancer detectionArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education

Artificial Intelligence Allows Leaving-In-Situ Colorectal Polyps

Open access
Hassan, Cesare, Balsamo, Giuseppina, Lorenzetti, Roberto, Zullo, Angelo, Antonelli, Giulio·2022·Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Artificial Intelligence (AI) could support cost-saving strategies for colonoscopy because of its accuracy in the optical diagnosis of colorectal polyps. However, AI must meet predefined criteria to be implemented in clinical settings. METHODS: An approved computer-aided diagnosis (CADx) module for differentiating between adenoma and nonadenoma in unmagnified white-light colonoscopy was used in a consecutive series of colonoscopies. For each polyp, CADx output and subsequent endoscopist diagnosis with advanced imaging were matched against the histology gold standard. The primary outcome was the negative predictive value (NPV) of CADx for adenomatous histology for ≤5-mm rectosigmoid lesions. We also calculated the NPV for AI-assisted endoscopist predictions, and agreement between CADx and histology-based postpolypectomy surveillance intervals according to European and American guidelines. RESULTS: Overall, 544 polyps were removed in 162 patients, of which 295 (54.2%) were ≤5-mm rectosigmoid histologically verified lesions. CADx diagnosis was feasible in 291 of 295 (98.6%), and the NPV for ≤5-mm rectosigmoid lesions was 97.6% (95% CI, 94.1%-99.1%). There were 242 of 295 (82%) lesions that were amenable for a leave-in-situ strategy. Based on CADx output, 212 of 544 (39%) would be amenable to a resect-and-discard strategy, resulting in a 95.6% (95% CI, 90.8%-98.0%) and 95.9% (95% CI, 89.8%-98.4%) agreement between CADx- and histology-based surveillance intervals according to European and American guidelines, respectively. A similar NPV (97.6%; 95% CI, 94.8%-99.1%) for ≤5-mm rectosigmoids was achieved by AI-assisted endoscopists assessing polyps with electronic chromoendoscopy, with a CADx-concordant diagnosis in 97.2% of cases. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, CADx without advanced imaging exceeded the benchmarks required for optical diagnosis of colorectal polyps. CADx could help implement cost-saving strategies in colonoscopy by reducing the burden of polypectomy and/or pathology. CLINICALTRIALS: gov registration number: NCT04884581.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cgh.2022.04.045

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previous studies on CADx systems for colonoscopy focused on assessing the performances of AI against the accuracy of physicians or against criteria established by gastroenterology societies for implementing the technology in a clinical setting.

    “Previous studies on cadx systems for colonoscopy focused on assessing the performances of ai against the accuracy of physicians19,20,27–30, or against the criteria established by gastroenterology societies for implementing the technology in a clinical setting31–34.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hassan, C., Balsamo, G., Lorenzetti, R., Zullo, A., & Antonelli, G.
Affiliations
  • Humanitas University (IT)
  • ASL Roma (IT)
  • Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
Corresponding author
Hassan, Cesare
Venue
Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-11
Volume
20
Issue
11
Pages
2505-2513.e4
ISSN
1542-3565 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4285014966
Cited by
119
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 5
FWCI
11.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in cancer detection
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Keywords
artificial intelligence, computer-aided diagnosis, colorectal polyps, adenoma, rectosigmoid polyps, negative predictive value, post-polypectomy surveillance, white light colonoscopy, histopathological correlation, advanced imaging
MeSH terms
Adenoma, Artificial Intelligence, Colonic Polyps, Colonoscopy, Humans, Colorectal Neoplasms, Narrow Band Imaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review