Cited by 302

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

On the Use of Ripley's K-Function and Its Derivatives to Analyze Domain Size

Kiskowski, Maria A., Hancock, John F., Kenworthy, Anne K.·2009·Biophysical Journal

Abstract

Ripley's K-, H-, and L-functions are used increasingly to identify clustering of proteins in membrane microdomains. In this approach, aggregation (or clustering) is identified if the average number of proteins within a distance r of another protein is statistically greater than that expected for a random distribution. However, it is not entirely clear how the function may be used to quantitatively determine the size of domains in which clustering occurs. Here, we evaluate the extent to which the domain radius can be determined by different interpretations of Ripley's K-statistic in a theoretical, idealized context. We also evaluate the measures for noisy experimental data and use Monte Carlo simulations to separate the effects of different types of experimental noise. We find that the radius of maximal aggregation approximates the domain radius, while identifying the domain boundary with the minimum of the derivative of H(r) is highly accurate in idealized conditions. The accuracy of both measures is impacted by the noise present in experimental data; for example, here, the presence of a large fraction of particles distributed as monomers and interdomain interactions. These findings help to delineate the limitations and potential of Ripley's K in real-life scenarios.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bpj.2009.05.039

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. Jacobson, 2007, Lipid rafts: at a crossroad between cell biology and physics, Nat. Cell Biol., 9, 7, 10.1038/ncb0107-7 · DOI
  2. Prior, 2003, Direct visualization of Ras proteins in spatially distinct cell surface microdomains, J. Cell Biol., 160, 165, 10.1083/jcb.200209091 · DOI
  3. Sharma, 2004, Nanoscale organization of multiple GPI-anchored proteins in living cell membranes, Cell, 116, 577, 10.1016/S0092-8674(04)00167-9 · DOI
  4. Hess, 2005, Quantitative electron microscopy and fluorescence spectroscopy of the membrane distribution of influenza hemagglutinin, J. Cell Biol., 169, 965, 10.1083/jcb.200412058 · DOI
  5. Parton, 2004, Lipid rafts and plasma membrane microorganization: insights from Ras, Trends Cell Biol., 14, 141, 10.1016/j.tcb.2004.02.001 · DOI
  6. Hancock, 2005, Electron microscopic imaging of Ras signaling domains, Methods, 37, 165, 10.1016/j.ymeth.2005.05.018 · DOI
  7. Zhang, 2006, Characterizing the topography of membrane receptors and signaling molecules from spatial patterns obtained using nanometer-scale electron-dense probes and electron microscopy, Micron, 37, 14, 10.1016/j.micron.2005.03.014 · DOI
  8. Kellner, 2007, Nanoscale organization of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors revealed by stimulated emission depletion microscopy, Neuroscience, 144, 135, 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2006.08.071 · DOI
  9. Hess, 2007, Dynamic clustered distribution of hemagglutinin resolved at 40 nm in living cell membranes discriminates between raft theories, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 104, 17370, 10.1073/pnas.0708066104 · DOI
  10. Ripley, 1977, Modelling spatial patterns, J. R. Stat. Soc. Series B Stat. Methodol., 39, 172, 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1977.tb01615.x · DOI · Paper page
  11. Besag, 1977, Comments on Ripley's paper, J. R. Stat. Soc. Series A., B39, 193
  12. Ehrlich, 2004, Endocytosis by random initiation and stabilization of clathrin-coated pits, Cell, 118, 591, 10.1016/j.cell.2004.08.017 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Heneberg, 2006, Topography of plasma membrane microdomains and its consequences for mast cell signaling, Eur. J. Immunol., 36, 2795, 10.1002/eji.200636159 · DOI
  14. Kiyokawa, 2005, Spatial and functional heterogeneity of sphingolipid-rich membrane domains, J. Biol. Chem., 280, 24072, 10.1074/jbc.M502244200 · DOI
  15. Lillemeier, 2006, Plasma membrane-associated proteins are clustered into islands attached to the cytoskeleton, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 103, 18992, 10.1073/pnas.0609009103 · DOI
  16. Pelkmans, 2005, Kinase-regulated quantal assemblies and kiss-and-run recycling of caveolae, Nature, 436, 128, 10.1038/nature03866 · DOI
  17. Plowman, 2005, H-ras, K-ras, and inner plasma membrane raft proteins operate in nanoclusters with differential dependence on the actin cytoskeleton, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 102, 15500, 10.1073/pnas.0504114102 · DOI
  18. Wyse, 2003, Caveolin interacts with the angiotensin II type 1 receptor during exocytic transport but not at the plasma membrane, J. Biol. Chem., 278, 23738, 10.1074/jbc.M212892200 · DOI
  19. Chung, 2007, Spatial demographic and genetic consequences of harvesting within populations of the terrestrial orchid, Cymbidium goeringii. Biol. Conserv., 137, 125, 10.1016/j.biocon.2007.01.021 · DOI
  20. Stoyan, 2000, Recent applications of spatial point process methods in forestry statistics, Stat. Sci., 15, 61
  21. Weigand, 2004, Rings, circles, and null-models for point patterns analysis in ecology, Oikos, 104, 209, 10.1111/j.0030-1299.2004.12497.x · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Kiskowski, M. A., Hancock, J. F., & Kenworthy, A. K.
Venue
Biophysical Journal
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-08
Volume
97
Issue
4
Pages
1095-1103
ISSN
0006-3495
Cited by
302
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review