Toward a molecular understanding of protein solubility: increased negative surface charge correlates with increased solubility
Open accessAbstract
Protein solubility is a problem for many protein chemists, including structural biologists and developers of protein pharmaceuticals. Knowledge about how intrinsic factors influence solubility is limited due to the difficulty of obtaining quantitative solubility measurements. Solubility measurements in buffer alone are difficult to reproduce, because gels or supersaturated solutions often form, making it impossible to determine solubility values for many proteins. Protein precipitants can be used to obtain comparative solubility measurements and, in some cases, estimations of solubility in buffer alone. Protein precipitants fall into three broad classes: salts, long-chain polymers, and organic solvents. Here, we compare the use of representatives from two classes of precipitants, ammonium sulfate and polyethylene glycol 8000, by measuring the solubility of seven proteins. We find that increased negative surface charge correlates strongly with increased protein solubility and may be due to strong binding of water by the acidic amino acids. We also find that the solubility results obtained for the two different precipitants agree closely with each other, suggesting that the two precipitants probe similar properties that are relevant to solubility in buffer alone.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Amino acid residues with lower aromaticity or hydrophilic are known to improve protein solubility.
“Amino acid residues with a lower aromaticity or hydrophilic are known to improve protein solubility (Han et al., 2019; Kramer et al., 2012; Niwa et al., 2009; Trevino et al., 2007; Warwicker et al., 2014; Wilkinson and Harrison, 1991).”
From Solubility-Weighted Index: fast and accurate prediction of protein solubility (2020) · cites this paper as Kramer et al., 2012
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Current insights into protein solubility: A review of its importance for alternative proteins
Grossmann, L., & McClements, D. J. (2023) · Food Hydrocolloids · doi:10.1016/j.foodhyd.2022.108416 · Cited by 367 · see citing works
Contreras, M. D. M., Lama-Muñoz, A., Manuel Gutiérrez-Pérez, J., Espínola, F., Moya, M., & Castro, E. (2019) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2019.02.040 · Cited by 232 · see citing works
High-concentration protein formulations: How high is high?
Garidel, P., Kuhn, A. B., Schäfer, L. V., Karow-Zwick, A. R., & Blech, M. (2017) · European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics · doi:10.1016/j.ejpb.2017.06.029 · Cited by 187 · see citing works
Solubility-Weighted Index: fast and accurate prediction of protein solubility
Bhandari, B. K., Gardner, P. P., & Lim, C. S. (2020) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa578 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
What RNA World? Why a Peptide/RNA Partnership Merits Renewed Experimental Attention
Carter, C. (2015) · Life · doi:10.3390/life5010294 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
SOLart: a structure-based method to predict protein solubility and aggregation
Hou, Q., Kwasigroch, J. M., Rooman, M., & Pucci, F. (2020) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btz773 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Sensitivity of oat protein solubility to changing ionic strength and pH
Li, R., & Xiong, Y. L. (2021) · Journal of Food Science · doi:10.1111/1750-3841.15544 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Mishra, S., Pandey, N., Rawat, A., Srivastava, D., Ray, A., & Kumar, V. (2023) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2023.3337260
- Authors
- Kramer, R. M., Shende, V. R., Motl, N., Pace, C. N., & Scholtz, J. M.
- Affiliations
- Texas A&M Health Science Center (US)
- University of Bremen (DE)
- Texas A&M University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Scholtz, J. Martin
- Venue
- Biophysical Journal
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-04
- Volume
- 102
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1907-1915
- ISSN
- 0006-3495 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3328702
- OpenAlex
- W2080187647
- Cited by
- 418
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 41 · 2025: 49 · 2024: 43 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 46 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 3.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Biophysical Journal (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (T32GM65088, T32GM065088)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein purification and stability
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Crystallization and Solubility Studies
- Keywords
- protein solubility, negative surface charge, protein precipitation, ammonium sulfate, polyethylene glycol 8000, acidic amino acids, water binding, pharmaceutical proteins
- MeSH terms
- Ammonium Sulfate, Animals, Humans, Polyethylene Glycols, Proteins, Solubility, Surface Properties, Protein Stability
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review