Live-cell superresolution imaging by pulsed STED two-photon excitation microscopy
Open accessAbstract
Two-photon laser scanning microscopy (2PLSM) allows fluorescence imaging in thick biological samples where absorption and scattering typically degrade resolution and signal collection of one-photon imaging approaches. The spatial resolution of conventional 2PLSM is limited by diffraction, and the near-infrared wavelengths used for excitation in 2PLSM preclude the accurate imaging of many small subcellular compartments of neurons. Stimulated emission depletion (STED) microscopy is a superresolution imaging modality that overcomes the resolution limit imposed by diffraction and allows fluorescence imaging of nanoscale features. Here, we describe the design and operation of a superresolution two-photon microscope using pulsed excitation and STED lasers. We examine the depth dependence of STED imaging in acute tissue slices and find enhancement of 2P resolution ranging from approximately fivefold at 20 μm to approximately twofold at 90-μm deep. The depth dependence of resolution is found to be consistent with the depth dependence of depletion efficiency, suggesting resolution is limited by STED laser propagation through turbid tissue. Finally, we achieve live imaging of dendritic spines with 60-nm resolution and demonstrate that our technique allows accurate quantification of neuronal morphology up to 30-μm deep in living brain tissue.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Two-photon STED has been successfully applied to dendritic spines in organotypical slices, resulting in 60-150 nm lateral resolution at 50-100 μm depths, but without improving the axial resolution.
“Nevertheless, it has been successfully applied to dendritic spines in organotypical slices, resulting in 60–150 nm lateral resolution at 50–100 μm depths, but without improving the axial resolution (Ding et al., 2009; Bethge et al., 2013; Takasaki et al., 2013).”
From Barriers in the brain: resolving dendritic spine morphology and compartmentalization (2014) · cites this paper as Takasaki et al., 2013
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 22 · Cited by 142
- Authors
- Takasaki, K. T., Ding, J. B., & Sabatini, B. L.
- Affiliations
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
- Corresponding author
- Sabatini, Bernardo L.
- Venue
- Biophysical Journal
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-02
- Volume
- 104
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 770-777
- ISSN
- 0006-3495 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3576532
- OpenAlex
- W2035988096
- Cited by
- 142
- References
- 22
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 30 · 2013: 8
- FWCI
- 12.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Biophysical Journal (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (T90DA022759, R90DA023427)
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R00NS075136, T32NS007484, RC1NS068917)
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (P30HD018655)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Laser-Matter Interactions and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Nonlinear Optical Materials Studies
- Keywords
- STED microscopy, two-photon microscopy, super-resolution imaging, pulsed excitation, live-cell imaging, turbid tissue, dendritic spines, neuronal morphology, intracellular imaging
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Microscopy, Confocal, Microscopy, Fluorescence, Multiphoton, Dendritic Spines, Mice, Nanospheres, CA1 Region, Hippocampal
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review