DeepTracer-ID: De novo protein identification from cryo-EM maps
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
The recent revolution in cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) has made it possible to determine macromolecular structures directly from cell extracts. However, identifying the correct protein from the cryo-EM map is still challenging and often needs additional sequence information from other techniques, such as tandem mass spectrometry and/or bioinformatics. Here, we present DeepTracer-ID, a server-based approach to identify the candidate protein in a user-provided organism de novo from a cryo-EM map, without the need for additional information. Our method first uses DeepTracer to generate a protein backbone model that best represents the cryo-EM map, and this model is then searched against the library of AlphaFold2 predictions for all proteins in the given organism. This method is highly accurate and robust for high-resolution cryo-EM maps: in all 13 experimental maps tested blindly, DeepTracer-ID identified the correct proteins as the top candidates. Eight of the maps were of known structures, while the other five unpublished maps were validated by prior protein annotation and careful inspection of the model refined into the map. The program also showed promising results for both homomeric and heteromeric protein complexes. This platform is possible because of the recent breakthroughs in large-scale three-dimensional protein structure prediction.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764 · see citing works
ColabFold - Making protein folding accessible to all
Mirdita, M., Schütze, K., Moriwaki, Y., Heo, L., Ovchinnikov, S., & Steinegger, M. (2021) · doi:10.1101/2021.08.15.456425 · Cited by 9,391 · see citing works
Varadi, M., Anyango, S., Deshpande, M., Nair, S., Natassia, C., Yordanova, G., Yuan, D., Stroe, O., Wood, G., Laydon, A., et al. (2022) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkab1061 · Cited by 7,850 · see citing works
Cryo-EM structures of tau filaments from Alzheimer’s disease
Fitzpatrick, A. W. P., Falcon, B., He, S., Murzin, A. G., Murshudov, G., Garringer, H. J., Crowther, R. A., Ghetti, B., Goedert, M., & Scheres, S. H. W. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature23002 · Cited by 2,061 · see citing works
Kühlbrandt, W. (2014) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1251652 · Cited by 1,325 · see citing works
FATCAT 2.0: towards a better understanding of the structural diversity of proteins
Li, Z., Jaroszewski, L., Iyer, M., Sedova, M., & Godzik, A. (2020) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkaa443 · Cited by 231 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Automated model building and protein identification in cryo-EM maps
Jamali, K., Käll, L., Zhang, R., Brown, A., Kimanius, D., & Scheres, S. H. W. (2023) · doi:10.1101/2023.05.16.541002 · Cited by 686 · see citing works
Giri, N., Roy, R. S., & Cheng, J. (2023) · Current Opinion in Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/j.sbi.2023.102536 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
McCafferty, C. L., Pennington, E. L., Papoulas, O., Taylor, D. W., & Marcotte, E. M. (2023) · Communications Biology · doi:10.1038/s42003-023-04773-7 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
- Authors
- Chang, L., Wang, F., Connolly, K., Meng, H., Su, Z., Cvirkaite-Krupovic, V., Krupovic, M., Egelman, E. H., & Si, D.
- Affiliations
- University of Washington Bothell (US)
- University of Virginia (US)
- University of Washington (US)
- University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
- Corresponding author
- Wang, Fengbin
- Egelman, Edward H.
- Si, Dong
- Venue
- Biophysical Journal
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-08
- Volume
- 121
- Issue
- 15
- Pages
- 2840-2848
- ISSN
- 0006-3495 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC9388381
- OpenAlex
- W4283642176
- Cited by
- 50
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 5.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Biophysical Journal (publishedVersion)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-21-CE11-0001-01)
- National Science Foundation (2030381)
- School of Medicine
- NSF
- National Institutes of Health (K99CA259526, GM122510, K99GM138756, G20-RR31199)
- Agence Nationale pour le Développement de la Recherche Universitaire
- University of Washington Bothell
- University of Virginia
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Structural Biology › Advanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and Applications
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Enzyme Structure and Function
- Keywords
- AlphaFold2, protein structure prediction, heteromeric protein complexes, macromolecular structure determination
- MeSH terms
- Models, Molecular, Protein Conformation, Proteins, Software, Cryoelectron Microscopy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review