Cited by 5Protein Structure and DynamicsGenomics and Phylogenetic StudiesGenomics and Rare Diseases

Biophysical characterization of high-confidence, small human proteins

Open access
Whited, A.M., Jungreis, Irwin, Allen, Jeffre, Cleveland, Christina L., Mudge, Jonathan M., Kellis, Manolis, Rinn, John L., Hough, Loren E.·2024·Biophysical Reports

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Significant efforts have been made to characterize the biophysical properties of proteins. Small proteins have received less attention because their annotation has historically been less reliable. However, recent improvements in sequencing, proteomics, and bioinformatics techniques have led to the high-confidence annotation of small open reading frames (smORFs) that encode for functional proteins, producing smORF-encoded proteins (SEPs). SEPs have been found to perform critical functions in several species, including humans. While significant efforts have been made to annotate SEPs, less attention has been given to the biophysical properties of these proteins. We characterized the distributions of predicted and curated biophysical properties, including sequence composition, structure, localization, function, and disease association of a conservative list of previously identified human SEPs. We found significant differences between SEPs and both larger proteins and control sets. Additionally, we provide an example of how our characterization of biophysical properties can contribute to distinguishing protein-coding smORFs from non-coding ones in otherwise ambiguous cases.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bpr.2024.100167

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Whited, A. M., Jungreis, I., Allen, J., Cleveland, C. L., Mudge, J. M., Kellis, M., Rinn, J. L., & Hough, L. E.
Affiliations
  • University of Colorado Boulder (US)
  • Broad Institute (US)
  • European Bioinformatics Institute (GB)
Corresponding author
Hough, Loren E.
Venue
Biophysical Reports
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-09
Volume
4
Issue
3
Pages
100167
ISSN
2667-0747 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4399920386
Cited by
5
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2
FWCI
0.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Biophysical Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (R35GM119755, U41HG007234, R01 HG004037)
  • HHMI
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomics and Rare Diseases
Keywords
small proteins, small open reading frames, human protein, protein structure, protein localization, protein function, disease association, sequence composition, protein annotation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review