Cited by 29Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorSubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes

Reduced Neural Recruitment for Bayesian Adjustment of Inhibitory Control in Methamphetamine Dependence

Open access
Harlé, Katia M., Zhang, Shunan, Ma, Ning, Yu, Angela J., Paulus, Martin P.·2016·Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging

Abstract

Delineating the processes that contribute to the progression and maintenance of substance dependence is critical to understanding and preventing addiction. Several previous studies have shown inhibitory control deficits in individuals with stimulant use disorder. We used a Bayesian computational approach to examine potential neural deficiencies in the dynamic predictive processing underlying inhibitory function among recently abstinent methamphetamine-dependent individuals (MDIs), a population at high risk of relapse. Sixty-two MDIs were recruited from a 28-day inpatient treatment program at the San Diego Veterans Affairs Medical Center and compared with 34 healthy control subjects. They completed a stop-signal task during functional magnetic resonance imaging. A Bayesian ideal observer model was used to predict individuals' trial-to-trial probabilistic expectations of inhibitory response, P(stop), to identify group differences specific to Bayesian expectation and prediction error computation. Relative to control subjects, MDIs were more likely to make stop errors on difficult trials and had attenuated slowing following stop errors. MDIs further exhibited reduced sensitivity as measured by the neural tracking of a Bayesian measure of surprise (unsigned prediction error), which was evident across all trials in the left posterior caudate and orbitofrontal cortex (Brodmann area 11), and selectively on stop error trials in the right thalamus and inferior parietal lobule. MDIs are less sensitive to surprising task events, both across trials and upon making commission errors, which may help explain why these individuals may not engage in switching strategy when the environment changes, leading to adverse consequences.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bpsc.2016.06.008

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In substance use disorder, activity in orbitofrontal, parietal, and subcortical (caudate and thalamus) areas in response to unpredictable stimuli was reduced in the clinical population.

    “Activity in orbitofrontal, parietal, and subcortical (caudate and thalamus) areas in response to unpredictable stimuli was also reduced in the clinical population (Harl ´ e et al., 2016).”
  • Abstinent methamphetamine-dependent individuals showed impaired inhibitory control and reduced strategic adaptation compared with healthy controls.

    “abstinent methamphetamine-dependent individuals showed impaired inhibitory control and reduced strategic adaptation compared with HC.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 56

  1. [1]Degenhardt L Mathers B Guarinieri M Panda S Phillips B Strathdee SA for Reference Group to the United Nations on HIV and Injecting Drug Use Meth/amphetamine use and associated HIV: Implications for global policy and public health. Int J Drug Policy 2010 21 347 358 20117923
  2. [2]Panenka WJ Procyshyn RM Lecomte T MacEwan GW Flynn SW Honer WG Barr AM Methamphetamine use: A comprehensive review of molecular, preclinical and clinical findings. Drug Alcohol Depend 2013 129 167 179 23273775
  3. [4]Gowin JL Harlé KM Stewart JL Wittmann M Tapert SF Paulus MP Attenuated insular processing during risk predicts relapse in early abstinent methamphetamine-dependent individuals. Neuropsychopharmacology 2014 39 1379 1387 24317375 PMC3988541
  4. [5]Clark VP Beatty GK Anderson RE Kodituwakku P Phillips JP Lane TDR Reduced fMRI activity predicts relapse in patients recovering from stimulant dependence. Human Brain Mapp 2012 35 414 428 PMC4470394 23015512
  5. [6]Paulus MP Tapert SF Schuckit MA Neural activation patterns of methamphetamine-dependent subjects during decision making predict relapse. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2005 62 761 768 15997017
  6. [7]Baicy K London ED Corticolimbic dysregulation and chronic methamphetamine abuse. Addiction 2007 102 suppl 1 5 15 17493049
  7. [8]Fillmore MT Drug abuse as a problem of impaired control: current approaches and findings. Behav and Cogn Neurosci Rev 2003 2 179 197 15006292
  8. [9]Jentsch JD Taylor JR Impulsivity resulting from frontostriatal dysfunction in drug abuse: implications for the control of behavior by reward-related stimuli. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 1999 146 373 390 10550488
  9. [10]Nordahl TE Salo R Natsuaki Y Galloway GP Waters C Moore CD Methamphetamine users in sustained abstinence: A proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy study. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2005 62 444 452 15809412
  10. [11]Salo R Nordahl TE Natsuaki Y Leamon MH Galloway GP Waters C Attentional control and brain metabolite levels in methamphetamine abusers. Biol Psychiatry 2007 61 1272 1280 17097074
  11. [12]Chang L Alicata D Ernst T Volkow N Structural and metabolic brain changes in the striatum associated with methamphetamine abuse. Addiction 2007 102 16 32 17493050
  12. [13]Thompson PM Hayashi KM Simon SL Geaga JA Hong MS Sui Y Structural abnormalities in the brains of human subjects who use methamphetamine. J Neurosci 2004 24 6028 6036 15229250 PMC6729247
  13. [14]Sekine Y Minabe Y Kawai M Suzuki K Iyo M Isoda H Metabolite alterations in basal ganglia associated with methamphetamine-related psychiatric symptoms: A proton MRS study. Neuropsychopharmacology 2002 27 453 461 12225702
  14. [15]Volkow ND Chang L Wang GJ Fowler JS Franceschi D Sedler MJ Higher cortical and lower subcortical metabolism in detoxified methamphetamine abusers. Am J Psychiatry 2001 158 383 389 11229978
  15. [16]Nestor LJ Ghahremani DG Monterosso J London ED Prefrontal hypoactivation during cognitive control in early abstinent methamphetamine-dependent subjects. Psychiatry Res 2011 194 287 295 22047731 PMC3225642
  16. [17]Sekine Y Minabe Y Ouchi Y Takei N Iyo M Nakamura K Association of dopamine transporter loss in the orbitofrontal and dorsolateral prefrontal cortices with methamphetamine-related psychiatric symptoms. Am J Psychiatry 2003 160 1699 1701 12944350
  17. [18]Kim YT Lee SW Kwon DH Seo JH Ahn BC Lee J Dose-dependent frontal hypometabolism on FDG-PET in methamphetamine abusers. J Psychiatr Res 2009 43 1166 1170 19394959
  18. [19]London ED Simon SL Berman SM Mandelkern MA Lichtman AM Bramen J Mood disturbances and regional cerebral metabolic abnormalities in recently abstinent methamphetamine abusers. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2004 61 73 84 14706946
  19. [21]Tabibnia G Monterosso JR Baicy K Aron AR Poldrack RA Chakrapani S Different forms of self-control share a neurocognitive substrate. J Neurosci 2011 31 4805 4810 21451018 PMC3096483
  20. [22]Hoffman WF Moore M Templin R McFarland B Hitzemann RJ Mitchell SH Neuropsychological function and delay discounting in methamphetamine-dependent individuals. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2006 188 162 170 16915378
  21. [23]Kirby KN Petry NM Heroin and cocaine abusers have higher discount rates for delayed rewards than alcoholics or non-drug-using controls. Addiction 2004 99 461 471 15049746
  22. [24]Wittmann M Leland DS Churan J Paulus MP Impaired time perception and motor timing in stimulant-dependent subjects. Drug Alcohol Depend 2007 90 183 192 17434690 PMC1997301
  23. [25]Rogers RD Everitt B Baldacchino A Blackshaw A Swainson R Wynne K Dissociable deficits in the decision-making cognition of chronic amphetamine abusers, opiate abusers, patients with focal damage to prefrontal cortex, and tryptophan-depleted normal volunteers: Evidence for monoaminergic mechanisms. Neuropsychopharmacology 1999 20 322 339 10088133
  24. [26]Paulus MP Hozack NE Zauscher BE Frank L Brown GG Braff DL Schuckit MA Behavioral and functional neuroimaging evidence for prefrontal dysfunction in methamphetamine-dependent subjects. Neuropsychopharmacology 2002 26 53 63 11751032
  25. [27]Aron JL Paulus MP Location, location: Using functional magnetic resonance imaging to pinpoint brain differences relevant to stimulant use. Addiction 2007 102 suppl 1 33 43 17493051
  26. [28]Ide JS Shenoy P Yu AJ Li CS Bayesian prediction and evaluation in the anterior cingulate cortex. J Neurosci 2013 33 2039 2047 23365241 PMC3711643
  27. [29]Harlé KM Shenoy P Stewart JL Tapert SF Angela JY Paulus MP Altered neural processing of the need to stop in young adults at risk for stimulant dependence. J Neurosci 2014 34 4567 4580 24672002 PMC3965782
  28. [30]Yu AJ Cohen JD Sequential effects: Superstition or rational behavior. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst 2008 21 1873 1880 26412953 PMC4580342
  29. [31]Shenoy P Angela JY Rational decision-making in inhibitory control. Front Hum Neurosci 2011 5 48 21647306 PMC3103997
  30. [32]Kennerley SW Behrens TE Wallis JD Double dissociation of value computations in orbitofrontal and anterior cingulate neurons. Nature Neurosci 2011 14 1581 1589 22037498 PMC3225689
  31. [33]Somerville LH Heatherton TF Kelley WM Anterior cingulate cortex responds differentially to expectancy violation and social rejection. Nat Neurosci 2006 9 1007 1008 16819523
  32. [34]Menon M Jensen J Vitcu I Graff-Guerrero A Crawley A Smith MA Kapur S Temporal difference modeling of the blood-oxygen level dependent response during aversive conditioning in humans: Effects of dopaminergic modulation. Biol Psychiatry 2007 62 765 772 17224134
  33. [36]Bucholz KK Cadoret R Cloninger CR Dinwiddie SH Hesselbrock VM Nurnberger JI Jr A new, semi-structured psychiatric interview for use in genetic linkage studies: A report on the reliability of the SSAGA. J Stud Alcohol 1994 55 149 158 8189735
  34. [37]Matthews SC Simmons AN Arce E Paulus MP Dissociation of inhibition from error processing using a parametric inhibitory task during functional magnetic resonance imaging. Neuroreport 2005 16 755 760 15858420
  35. [38]Shenoy P Rao RPN Yu A A rational decision making framework for inhibitory control. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst 24 2011
  36. [41]Cox RW AFNI: Software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages. Comput Biomed Res 1996 29 162 173 8812068
  37. [42]Büchel C Holmes AP Rees G Friston KJ Characterizing stimulus-response functions using nonlinear regressors in parametric fMRI experiments. Neuroimage 1998 8 140 148 9740757
  38. [45]Wallis JD Orbitofrontal cortex and its contribution to decision-making. Annu Rev Neurosci 2007 30 31 56 17417936
  39. [47]Elliott R Frith CD Dolan RJ Differential neural response to positive and negative feedback in planning and guessing tasks. Neuropsychologia 1997 35 1395 1404 9347486
  40. [48]Elliott R Rees G Dolan RJ Ventromedial prefrontal cortex mediates guessing. Neuropsychologia 1999 37 403 411 10215087
  41. [49]Nobre AC Coull JT Frith CD Mesulam MM Orbitofrontal cortex is activated during breaches of expectation in tasks of visual attention. Nat Neurosci 1999 2 11 12 10195173
  42. [50]Ramnani N Elliott R Athwal BS Passingham RE Prediction error for free monetary reward in the human prefrontal cortex. Neuro-image 2004 23 777 786 15528079
  43. [51]Delgado MR Li J Schiller D Phelps EA The role of the striatum in aversive learning and aversive prediction errors. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B: Biol Sci 2008 363 3787 3800 18829426 PMC2607367
  44. [52]Haruno M Kawato M Different neural correlates of reward expectation and reward expectation error in the putamen and caudate nucleus during stimulus-action-reward association learning. J Neurophysiol 2006 95 948 959 16192338
  45. [53]Mattfeld AT Gluck MA Stark CE Functional specialization within the striatum along both the dorsal/ventral and anterior/posterior axes during associative learning via reward and punishment. Learn Mem 2011 18 703 711 22021252 PMC3207255
  46. [54]Horn NR Dolan M Elliott R Deakin JF Woodruff PW Response inhibition and impulsivity: An fMRI study. Neuropsychologia 2003 41 1959 1966 14572528
  47. [55]Tervo DG Proskurin M Manakov M Kabra M Vollmer A Branson K Karpova AY Behavioral variability through stochastic choice and its gating by anterior cingulate cortex. Cell 2014 159 21 32 25259917
  48. [56]Ploghaus A Tracey I Clare S Gati JS Rawlins JN Matthews PM Learning about pain: The neural substrate of the prediction error for aversive events. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2000 97 9281 9286 10908676 PMC16859
  49. [57]Kim H Shimojo S O'Doherty JP Is avoiding an aversive outcome rewarding? Neural substrates of avoidance learning in the human brain. PLoS Biol 2006 4 e233 16802856 PMC1484497
  50. [58]Di Martino A Scheres A Margulies D Kelly AM Uddin LQ Shehzad Z Functional connectivity of human striatum: A resting state FMRI study. Cereb Cortex 2008 18 2735 2747 18400794
  51. [59]Rushworth MF Behrens TE Johansen-Berg H Connection patterns distinguish 3 regions of human parietal cortex. Cereb Cortex 2006 16 1418 1430 16306320
  52. [60]Knutson B Wimmer GE Splitting the difference: How does the brain code reward episodes? Ann N Y Acad Sci 2007 1104 54 69 17416922
  53. [61]Spoormaker VI Andrade KC Schröter MS Sturm A Goya-Maldonado R Sämann PG Czisch M The neural correlates of negative prediction error signaling in human fear conditioning. Neuroimage 2011 54 2250 2256 20869454
  54. [62]Liljeholm M Tricomi E O'Doherty JP Balleine BW Neural correlates of instrumental contingency learning: Differential effects of action-reward conjunction and disjunction. J Neurosci 2011 31 2474 2480 21325514 PMC3269757
  55. [63]Liljeholm M Wang S Zhang J O'Doherty JP Neural correlates of the divergence of instrumental probability distributions. J Neurosci 2013 33 12519 12527 23884955 PMC3721851
  56. [65]Mars RB Debener S Gladwin TE Harrison LM Haggard P Rothwell JC Bestmann S Trial-by-trial fluctuations in the event-related electroencephalogram reflect dynamic changes in the degree of surprise. J Neurosci 2008 28 12539 12545 19020046 PMC6671727

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Harlé, K. M., Zhang, S., Ma, N., Yu, A. J., & Paulus, M. P.
Affiliations
University of California San Diego (US)
Corresponding author
Harlé, Katia M.
Venue
Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-09
Volume
1
Issue
5
Pages
448-459
ISSN
2451-9022 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2470144699
Cited by
29
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1
FWCI
1.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Biological Psychiatry Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • TUbilio (Technical University of Darmstadt) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Mental Health
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA016663, R01DA018307, P20DA027843, F32DA036959, R01DA027797)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Keywords
methamphetamine dependence, inhibitory control, Bayesian surprise, prediction error, stop-signal task, relapse risk, orbitofrontal cortex, thalamus, inferior parietal lobule, stimulant use disorder

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review