Brainmarker-I Differentially Predicts Remission to Various Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Treatments: A Discovery, Transfer, and Blinded Validation Study
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder is characterized by neurobiological heterogeneity, possibly explaining why not all patients benefit from a given treatment. As a means to select the right treatment (stratification), biomarkers may aid in personalizing treatment prescription, thereby increasing remission rates. METHODS: The biomarker in this study was developed in a heterogeneous clinical sample (N = 4249) and first applied to two large transfer datasets, a priori stratifying young males (<18 years) with a higher individual alpha peak frequency (iAPF) to methylphenidate (N = 336) and those with a lower iAPF to multimodal neurofeedback complemented with sleep coaching (N = 136). Blinded, out-of-sample validations were conducted in two independent samples. In addition, the association between iAPF and response to guanfacine and atomoxetine was explored. RESULTS: Retrospective stratification in the transfer datasets resulted in a predicted gain in normalized remission of 17% to 30%. Blinded out-of-sample validations for methylphenidate (n = 41) and multimodal neurofeedback (n = 71) corroborated these findings, yielding a predicted gain in stratified normalized remission of 36% and 29%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study introduces a clinically interpretable and actionable biomarker based on the iAPF assessed during resting-state electroencephalography. Our findings suggest that acknowledging neurobiological heterogeneity can inform stratification of patients to their individual best treatment and enhance remission rates.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Studies identifying data-driven subgroups of patients characterized by different EEG profiles, which appear associated with various clinical characteristics and different rates of treatment response, demonstrate this.
“This is demonstrated by studies identifying data-driven subgroups of patients characterized by different EEG profiles, which appear associated with various clinical characteristics 75 and different rates of treatment response 76,77 .”
From Candidate diagnostic biomarkers for neurodevelopmental disorders in children and adolescents: a systematic review (2023) · cites this paper as [76]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Cortese, S., Adamo, N., Del Giovane, C., Mohr-Jensen, C., Hayes, A. J., Carucci, S., Atkinson, L. Z., Tessari, L., Banaschewski, T., Coghill, D., et al. (2018) · The Lancet Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s2215-0366(18)30269-4 · Cited by 1,402 · see citing works
Molina, B. S. G., Hinshaw, S. P., Swanson, J. M., Arnold, L. E., Vitiello, B., Jensen, P. S., Epstein, J. N., Hoza, B., Hechtman, L., Abikoff, H. B., et al. (2009) · Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry · doi:10.1097/chi.0b013e31819c23d0 · Cited by 1,182 · see citing works
Self-citationA Review of Heterogeneity in Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)
Luo, Y., Weibman, D., Halperin, J. M., & Li, X. (2019) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2019.00042 · Cited by 394 · see citing works
Musser, E. D., Backs, R. W., Schmitt, C. F., Ablow, J. C., Measelle, J. R., & Nigg, J. T. (2011) · Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10802-011-9499-1 · Cited by 179 · see citing works
Bellato, A., Arora, I., Hollis, C., & Groom, M. J. (2020) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.11.001 · Cited by 172 · see citing works
Griffiths, K. R., Leikauf, J. E., Tsang, T. W., Clarke, S., Hermens, D. F., Efron, D., Williams, L. M., & Kohn, M. R. (2018) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2018.03.009 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- Garcia Pimenta M, Brown T, Arns M, Enriquez-Geppert S (2021): Treatment efficacy and clinical effectiveness of EEG neurofeedback as a personalized and multimodal treatment in ADHD: A critical review. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat 17:637-648.
- Olbrich S, van Dinteren R, Arns M (2015): Personalized medicine: Review and perspectives of promising baseline EEG biomarkers in major depressive disorder and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Neuropsychobiology 72:229-240.
- Klimesch W (1999): EEG alpha and theta oscillations reflect cognitive and memory performance: A review and analysis. Brain Res Brain Res Rev 29:169-195.
- Van Doren J, Arns M, Heinrich H, Vollebregt MA, Strehl U, Loo SK (2019): Sustained effects of neurofeedback in ADHD: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatr 28:293-305.
- van Dijk H, van Wingen G, Denys D, Olbrich S, van Ruth R, Arns M (2022): The two decades brainclinics research archive for insights in neurophysiology (TD-BRAIN) database. Sci Data 9:333. Blinded Validation of an ADHD Stratification Biomarker Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging January 2023; 8:52-60 www.sobp.org/BPCNNI 59 Biological Psychiatry: CNNI
- Virtanen P, Gommers R, Oliphant TE, Haberland M, Reddy T, Cournapeau D, et al. (2020): SciPy 1.0: Fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in Python [published correction appears in Nat Methods 2020; 17:352]. Nat Methods 17:261-272.
- Musser ED, Backs RW, Schmitt CF, Ablow JC, Measelle JR, Nigg JT (2011): Emotion regulation via the autonomic nervous system in chil- dren with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) [published correction appears in J Abnorm Child Psychol 2018; 46:655-657]. J Abnorm Child Psychol 39:841-852.
- Corlier J, Carpenter LL, Wilson AC, Tirrell E, Gobin AP, Kavanaugh B, Leuchter AF (2019): The relationship between individual alpha peak frequency and clinical outcome with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD). Brain Stimul 12:1572-1578. Blinded Validation of an ADHD Stratification Biomarker 60 Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging January 2023; 8:52-60 www.sobp.org/BPCNNI Biological Psychiatry:
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Cortese, S., Solmi, M., Michelini, G., Bellato, A., Blanner, C., Canozzi, A., Eudave, L., Farhat, L. C., Højlund, M., Köhler‐Forsberg, O., et al. (2023) · World Psychiatry · doi:10.1002/wps.21037 · Cited by 147 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Voetterl, H., van Wingen, G., Michelini, G., Griffiths, K. R., Gordon, E., DeBeus, R., Korgaonkar, M. S., Loo, S. K., Palmer, D., Breteler, R., Denys, D., Arnold, L. E., du Jour, P., van Ruth, R., Jansen, J., van Dijk, H., & Arns, M.
- Affiliations
- Maastricht University (NL)
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- The University of Sydney (AU)
- University of North Carolina at Asheville (US)
- Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
- Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL)
- The Ohio State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Voetterl, Helena
- Arns, Martijn
- ORCID
- Venue
- Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2023-01
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 52-60
- ISSN
- 2451-9022 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4220782567
- Cited by
- 35
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 5
- FWCI
- 4.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Biological Psychiatry Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research Publications (Maastricht University) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Queen Mary Research Online (Queen Mary University of London) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Takeda Pharmaceutical Company
- National Institute of Mental Health
- Seaside Therapeutics
- Pfizer
- Shire
- Roche
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
- Keywords
- attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, treatment response prediction, biomarkers, resting-state EEG, methylphenidate, neurofeedback, sleep coaching, guanfacine, atomoxetine, treatment stratification, personalized treatment, remission
- MeSH terms
- Atomoxetine Hydrochloride, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Humans, Male, Methylphenidate, Retrospective Studies, Treatment Outcome
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review