Cited by 74Neuroendocrine regulation and behaviorNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorOlfactory and Sensory Function Studies

Dopamine and monogamy

Curtis, J. Thomas, Liu, Yan, Aragona, Brandon J., Wang, Zuoxin·2006·Brain Research

Abstract

Social attachments play a central role in human society. In fact, such attachments are so important that deficits in the ability to form meaningful social bonds are associated with a variety of psychological disorders. Although mother-infant bonding has been studied for many years, we only recently have begun to examine the processes that underlie social bonds between adults. Over the past decade, central dopamine has become a focus of such research, especially its role in pair bonding between mates in species that display monogamous life strategies. Neuroanatomical and pharmacological studies in rodents have firmly established central dopamine systems, especially the mesocorticolimbic dopamine circuitry, in the formation, expression, and maintenance of monogamous pair bonds. As this research has progressed, it has become apparent that there is considerable overlap between the processes that underlie pair bonding and those that mediate responses to abused substances. This suggests that social bonding and substance abuse each may affect the other. Herein we review the current state of knowledge of central dopamine involvement in pair bond formation, expression, and maintenance. We first describe the neuroanatomical substrate within which dopamine exerts its effects on social bonding. We then describe dopamine receptor subtype-specific influences on pair bonding and how dopamine receptor activation may interact with activation of other neurochemical systems. Finally, we describe possible interactions between social bonding and substance abuse.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.07.126

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 201 · Cited by 74

Authors
Curtis, J. T., Liu, Y., Aragona, B. J., & Wang, Z.
Affiliations
Florida State University (US)
Corresponding author
Curtis, J. Thomas
Venue
Brain Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-12
Volume
1126
Issue
1
Pages
76-90
ISSN
0006-8993 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1994854314
Cited by
74
References
201
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 6
FWCI
5.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Brain Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH 58616, R01MH058616)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD048462, HD-48462)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
Keywords
dopamine, monogamy, pair bonding, social bonding, dopamine receptor subtypes, substance abuse, addiction, social attachment, rodent models
MeSH terms
Animals, Dopamine, Female, Humans, Limbic System, Male, Neural Pathways, Pair Bond, Receptors, Dopamine, Reward, Sexual Behavior, Animal, Social Behavior, Substance-Related Disorders, Models, Animal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review