Cited by 1,930Physical Activity and HealthCardiovascular and exercise physiologyExercise and Physiological Responses

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 109 of the 109 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The effects of acute exercise on cognitive performance: A meta-analysis

Open access

Abstract

There is a substantial body of literature related to the effects of a single session of exercise on cognitive performance. The premise underlying this research is that physiological changes in response to exercise have implications for cognitive function. This literature has been reviewed both narratively and meta-analytically and, although the research findings are mixed, researchers have generally concluded that there is a small positive effect. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to provide an updated comprehensive analysis of the extant literature on acute exercise and cognitive performance and to explore the effects of moderators that have implications for mechanisms of the effects. Searches of electronic databases and examinations of reference lists from relevant studies resulted in 79 studies meeting inclusion criteria. Consistent with past findings, analyses indicated that the overall effect was positive and small (g=0.097 n=1034). Positive and small effects were also found in all three acute exercise paradigms: during exercise (g=0.101; 95% confidence interval [CI]; 0.041-0.160), immediately following exercise (g=0.108; 95% CI; 0.069-0.147), and after a delay (g=0.103; 95% CI; 0.035-0.170). Examination of potential moderators indicated that exercise duration, exercise intensity, type of cognitive performance assessed, and participant fitness were significant moderators. In conclusion, the effects of acute exercise on cognitive performance are generally small; however, larger effects are possible for particular cognitive outcomes and when specific exercise parameters are used.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.brainres.2012.02.068

Cites

109 of 109 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 107 references

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Lipsey, 2000, vol. 49
  2. *Barnes, D. L., 2000. The effect of exercise-induced physiological arousal on working memory. Doctor of Philosophy Dissertation, North Carolina State University, Raleigh.
  3. *Delignieres, 1994, Influence of physical exercise on choice reaction time in sports experts: the mediating role of resource allocation, J. Hum. Mov. Stud., 27, 173
  4. *Kenney, J. L., 2006. The dose–response effects of melatonin ingestion on sustained exercise, thermoregulation, and associated neurobehavioral assessments. Doctor of Philosophy Dissertation, Boston University, Boston.
  5. *McMorris, 1996, Effect of exercise on soccer decision-making tasks of differing complexities, J. Hum. Mov. Stud., 30, 177
  6. *Pesce, 2002, Effects of a sub-maximal physical load on the orienting and focusing of visual attention, J. Hum. Mov. Stud., 42, 401
  7. *Pesce, 2004, Modulation of visuospatial attention at rest and during physical exercise: gender differences, Int. J. Sport Psychol., 35, 328
  8. *Rong, N., 1986. The effects of exhaustive exercise on fractionated hand and leg reaction time (fatigue). Master of Science Master's Thesis, Central Michigan University.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 401–500 of 1,001

Metadata

Authors
Chang, Y. K., Labban, J. D., Gapin, J. I., & Etnier, J. L.
Affiliations
University of North Carolina at Greensboro (US)
Corresponding author
Etnier, J.L.
Venue
Brain Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-05
Volume
1453
Pages
87-101
ISSN
0006-8993 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2011039678
Cited by
1,930
References
107
Citations by year
2026: 144 · 2025: 173 · 2024: 192 · 2023: 179 · 2022: 181 · 2021: 191 · 2020: 163 · 2019: 189 · 2018: 140 · 2017: 103 · 2016: 98 · 2015: 74 · 2014: 69 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 8
FWCI
6.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Brain Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • NC Digital Online Collection of Knowledge and Scholarship (The University of North Carolina at Greensboro) (submittedVersion)
Funders
University of North Carolina at Greensboro
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Exercise and Physiological Responses
Keywords
acute exercise, cognitive performance, exercise and cognition, exercise duration, exercise intensity, physical fitness, cognitive outcomes
MeSH terms
Cognition, Humans, Neuropsychological Tests, Exercise

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review