Cited by 12Sexual Differentiation and DisordersHypothalamic control of reproductive hormonesNeuroendocrine regulation and behavior

Neonatal RU-486 (mifepristone) exposure increases androgen receptor immunoreactivity and sexual behavior in male rats

Forbes-Lorman, Robin, Auger, Anthony P., Auger, Catherine J.·2014·Brain Research

Abstract

Progesterone and progestin receptors (PRs) are known to play a role in the development of brain physiology and behavior in many different species. The distribution and regulation of PRs within the developing brain suggest that they likely contribute to the organization of the brain and behavior in a sex-specific manner. We examined the role of PR signaling during development on the organization of adult sexual behavior and androgen receptor (AR) expression in the brain. We administered the PR antagonist, RU-486, subcutaneously to male and female rats on postnatal days 1-7 (0=day of birth) and examined adult sexual behavior and AR-immunoreactivity (AR-ir) in the adult brain. A typical sex difference in lordosis quotient (LQ) was observed and neonatal RU-486 treatment did not alter this behavior. In contrast, neonatal RU-486 treatment increased adult male sexual behavior and AR-ir in several brain areas in males. These data indicate that a transient disruption in PR signaling during development can have lasting consequences on the male brain and may increase male sexual behavior in part by increasing AR expression, and therefore androgen sensitivity, in adulthood.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.brainres.2013.11.012

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Forbes-Lorman, R., Auger, A. P., & Auger, C. J.
Affiliations
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Venue
Brain Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-01
Volume
1543
Pages
143-150
ISSN
0006-8993 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2042237322
Cited by
12
References
3
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1
FWCI
0.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Brain Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation (NSF) (IOS-1122074)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Sexual Differentiation and Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Hypothalamic control of reproductive hormones
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
Keywords
RU486, mifepristone, progesterone receptor, androgen receptor, neonatal drug exposure, sexual differentiation of the brain, male sexual behavior, sex differences, androgen sensitivity, postnatal development
MeSH terms
Analysis of Variance, Animals, Animals, Newborn, Brain, Female, Hormone Antagonists, Male, Receptors, Androgen, Sexual Behavior, Animal, Sex Characteristics, Mifepristone, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review