Cited by 18Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesPhysical Activity and HealthAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Effects of physical exercise on negative emotional susceptibility in young adult females: An event-related potential study

Qiu, Fanghui, Peng, Weiwei, Li, Manman, Zhang, Lanlan, Zhu, Hua, Tan, Xiaoying, Li, Hong, Zhang, Jian·2019·Brain Research

Abstract

The present study investigated whether habitual physical exercise can regulate susceptibility to negative emotions in young adult female participants. Female participants with and without long-term physical exercise habits were recruited and assigned to exercise and non-exercise groups, respectively. All participants performed a standard/deviant distinction task in which the emotional valence of the deviants could be highly negative (HN), moderately negative (MN), or neutral. Event-related potentials (ERPs) elicited by deviants were recorded and compared between the two groups. Regardless of the emotional valence of the deviants, the exercise group exhibited shorter reaction times (RTs) and greater parietal P3 responses to all deviants, compared to the non-exercise group, consistent with a superiority in detecting and responding to deviants. Importantly, whereas the non-exercise group showed greater frontal-central N2 responses to MN deviant stimuli than to neutral deviant stimuli, such a difference was not observed in the exercise group, indicating that the participants who exercised regularly had decreased attentional capture and allocation to MN deviants, and thus an apparent decreased negative emotional susceptibility selectively to moderately negative emotional stimuli. These results may indicate an effect of physical exercise on the processing of negative emotional information and support the promotion of physical exercise in the maintenance of mental health in females.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.brainres.2019.146382

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Qiu, F., Peng, W., Li, M., Zhang, L., Zhu, H., Tan, X., Li, H., & Zhang, J.
Affiliations
  • Shanghai University of Sport (CN)
  • Shenzhen University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Li, Hong
  • Zhang, Jian
Venue
Brain Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-11
Volume
1722
Pages
146382
ISSN
0006-8993 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2966894519
Cited by
18
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Brain Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Nantong Municipal Commission of Health and Family Planning
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China
  • Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
physical activity, emotional valence, P300, N2 component, attentional capture, emotional processing, young adult women, mental health promotion
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Brain, Electroencephalography, Emotions, Evoked Potentials, Female, Humans, Reaction Time, Exercise, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review