Cited by 81Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicalsSexual Differentiation and DisordersHypothalamic control of reproductive hormones

Influence of endocrine active compounds on the developing rodent brain

Patisaul, Heather B., Polston, Eva K.·2008·Brain Research Reviews

Abstract

Changes in the volumes of sexually dimorphic brain nuclei are often used as a biomarker for developmental disruption by endocrine-active compounds (EACs). However, these gross, morphological analyses do not reliably predict disruption of cell phenotype or neuronal function. Therefore, an experimental approach that simultaneously assesses anatomical, physiological and behavioral endpoints is required when developing risk assessment models for EAC exposure. Using this more comprehensive approach we have demonstrated that the disruption of nuclear volume does not necessarily coincide with disruption of cellular phenotype or neuroendocrine function in two sexually dimorphic brain nuclei: the anteroventral periventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus (AVPV) and the sexually dimorphic nucleus of the preoptic area (SDN). These results demonstrate that nuclear volume is likely not an appropriate biomarker for EAC exposure. We further demonstrated that neonatal exposure to the EACs genistein (GEN) and Bisphenol-A (BPA) can affect sexually dimorphic brain morphology and neuronal phenotypes in adulthood with regional and cellular specificity suggesting that effects observed in one brain region may not be predictive of effects within neighboring regions. Finally, developmental EAC exposure has been shown to affect a variety of sexually dimorphic behaviors including reproductive behavior. These effects are likely to have a broad impact as maladaptive behavior could translate to decreased f…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.brainresrev.2007.06.008

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Neonatal treatment with BPA reduces sex differences in the brain and can modify neurite and dendrite formation in rodents.

    “Neonatal treatment with BPA in general reduces sex differences in the brain and can modify neurite and dendrite formation [3], [8], [9], [10], [11].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Patisaul, H. B., & Polston, E. K.
Affiliations
  • North Carolina State University (US)
  • Howard University (US)
Corresponding author
Patisaul, Heather B.
Venue
Brain Research Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-03
Volume
57
Issue
2
Pages
352-362
ISSN
0165-0173 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2061043446
Cited by
81
References
2
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 4
FWCI
0.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Brain Research Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Sexual Differentiation and Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Hypothalamic control of reproductive hormones
Keywords
endocrine active compounds, sexually dimorphic nucleus of the preoptic area, genistein, bisphenol A, neonatal exposure, neuronal phenotype, neuroendocrine function, reproductive behavior
MeSH terms
Bisphenol A Compounds, Animals, Benzhydryl Compounds, Brain, Estrogens, Non-Steroidal, Female, Male, Phenols, Sex Characteristics, Genistein, Protein Kinase Inhibitors, Mice, Rats, Endocrine Disruptors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review