Cited by 132Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum DisordersAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

Group versus individual cognitive-behavioural treatment for obsessive-compulsive disorder: A controlled trial

Anderson, Rebecca A., Rees, Clare S.·2007·Behaviour Research and Therapy

Abstract

The efficacy of group cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) for obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) has received relatively little research attention compared with the large number of studies that have investigated individual CBT. The current study is the first controlled study to compare an identical CBT protocol, containing both cognitive and behavioural elements, delivered either individually or in a group. Participants were randomly assigned to either 10 weeks of individual CBT, 10 weeks of group CBT or a 10 week wait-list. Participants with significant rates of secondary comorbidity were included in the study to enhance the generalisability of results. Intention-to-treat and completer analyses were carried out and indicated no differences between the group and individual treatments on outcome measures. Large effect sizes were found for both conditions. Analysis of clinically significant change indicated that the individual treatment was associated with a more rapid response but that both treatments had equivalent rates of recovered participants by brief follow-up. The importance of further investigations of the efficacy of group CBT for OCD is discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.brat.2006.01.016

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • CBT has been found superior to wait list controls in every relevant trial.

    “CBT has been found to be superior to wait list controls in every relevant trial (Anderson & Rees, 2007; Cordioli et al., 2003; Freeston et al., 1997; McLean et al., 2001; Vogel et al., 2004; Whittal et al., 2010).”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 49 · Cited by 132

Authors
Anderson, R. A., & Rees, C. S.
Affiliations
Curtin University (AU)
Corresponding author
Rees, Clare S.
Venue
Behaviour Research and Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-01
Volume
45
Issue
1
Pages
123-137
ISSN
0005-7967 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1990019631
Cited by
132
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 7
FWCI
9.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behaviour Research and Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
obsessive-compulsive disorder, group cognitive behavioral therapy, treatment comparison, treatment efficacy, comorbidities, treatment response time
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, Psychometrics, Psychotherapy, Group, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review