CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 132Sleep and related disordersDigital Mental Health InterventionsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 49 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Guided internet cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia compared to a control treatment - a randomized trial

Open access
Kaldo, Viktor, Jernelöv, Susanna, Blom, Kerstin, Ljótsson, Brjánn, Brodin, Maria, Jörgensen, Mia, Kraepelien, Martin, Rück, Christian, Lindefors, Nils·2015·Behaviour Research and Therapy
DOI 10.1016/j.brat.2015.06.001
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

AIM: To evaluate if internet-delivered Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for insomnia (ICBT-i) with brief therapist support outperforms an active control treatment. METHOD: Adults diagnosed with insomnia were recruited via media (n = 148) and randomized to either eight weeks of ICBT-i or an active internet-based control treatment. Primary outcome was the insomnia severity index (ISI) assessed before and after treatment, with follow-ups after 6 and 12 months. Secondary outcomes were use of sleep medication, sleep parameters (sleep diary), perceived stress, and a screening of negative treatment effects. Hierarchical Linear Mixed Models were used for intent-to-treat analyses and handling of missing data. RESULTS: ICBT-i was significantly more effective than the control treatment in reducing ISI (Cohen's d = 0.85), sleep medication, sleep efficiency, sleep latency, and sleep quality at post-treatment. The positive effects were sustained. However, after 12 months the difference was no longer significant due to a continuous decrease in ISI among controls, possibly due to their significantly higher utilization of insomnia relevant care after treatment. Forty-six negative effects were reported but did not differ between interventions. CONCLUSIONS: Supported ICBT-i is more effective than an active control treatment in reducing insomnia severity and treatment gains remain stable one year after treatment.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.brat.2015.06.001

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 48 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Bastien, 2001, Validation of the insomnia severity index as an outcome measure for insomnia research, Sleep Medicine, 2, 297, 10.1016/S1389-9457(00)00065-4 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Morin, 2009, vol. 301, 2005

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–130 of 130

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Kaldo, V., Jernelöv, S., Blom, K., Ljótsson, B., Brodin, M., Jörgensen, M., Kraepelien, M., Rück, C., & Lindefors, N.
Affiliations
Karolinska Institutet (SE)
Corresponding author
Kaldo, Viktor
ORCID
Venue
Behaviour Research and Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-08
Volume
71
Pages
90-100
ISSN
0005-7967 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.brat.2015.06.001
OpenAlex
W1771931246
Cited by
132
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 4
FWCI
14.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Behaviour Research and Therapy (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Söderström-Königska Foundation (SLS-156621)
  • AFA Sickness Insurance Research Fund (2999/09-721)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
insomnia, internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy, Insomnia Severity Index, therapist support, sleep medication use, sleep efficiency, sleep latency, sleep quality, perceived stress, treatment effects, long-term treatment outcomes
MeSH terms
Female, Humans, Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Compliance, Professional-Patient Relations, Therapy, Computer-Assisted, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Patient Satisfaction, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review