Cited by 109Digital Mental Health InterventionsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMental Health Treatment and Access

A randomized controlled trial of an internet-delivered treatment: Its potential as a low-intensity community intervention for adults with symptoms of depression

Open access
Richards, D., Timulak, L., O'Brien, E., Hayes, C., Vigano, N., Sharry, J., Doherty, G.·2015·Behaviour Research and Therapy

Abstract

Background Internet-delivered treatments for depression have proved successful, with supported programs offering the potential for improved adherence and outcomes. Internet interventions are particularly interesting in the context of increasing access to interventions, and delivering interventions population-wide.Methods The study was a randomized controlled trial of an 7-module internet-delivered cognitive behavioral therapy (iCBT) program for adults with depressive symptoms (n = 96) compared to a waiting-list control group (n = 92). Participants received weekly support from a trained supporter. The primary outcome was depressive symptoms as measured by the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II). The program was made available nationwide from an established and recognized charity for depression.Results For the treatment group, post-treatment effect sizes reported were large for the primary outcome measure (d = 0.91). The between-group effects were moderate to large and statistically significant for the primary outcomes (d = 0.50) favoring the treatment group. Gains were maintained at 6-month follow-up.Conclusion The study has demonstrated the efficacy of the internet-delivered Space from Depression treatment. Participants demonstrated reliable and statistically significant changes in symptoms from pre-to post-intervention. The study supports a model for delivering online depression interventions population-wide using trained supporters.Trial registration number Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN03704676. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN03704676.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.brat.2015.10.005

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 59 · Cited by 109

Authors
Richards, D., Timulak, L., O'Brien, E., Hayes, C., Vigano, N., Sharry, J., & Doherty, G.
Affiliations
Trinity College Dublin (IE)
Corresponding author
Richards, D.
Venue
Behaviour Research and Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-12
Volume
75
Pages
20-31
ISSN
0005-7967 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2118750952
Cited by
109
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1
FWCI
12.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Behaviour Research and Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Arrow@dit (Dublin Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
Funders
SilverCloud Health Ltd. and Aware Charity
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy, depression, depressive symptoms, digital mental health interventions, medication adherence, population-level interventions
MeSH terms
Adult, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Residence Characteristics, Therapy, Computer-Assisted, Waiting Lists, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review