A systematic review and meta-analysis of cognitive processing deficits associated with body dysmorphic disorder
Open accessAbstract
This systematic review and meta-analysis examined the evidence supporting the association between body dysmorphic disorder (BDD) symptomology and four types of cognitive processing abnormalities: local processing, selective attention, interpretive biases, and memory deficits. Twenty-three studies met inclusion requirements that examined differences in performance on cognitive tasks between BDD and control groups across the four categories. Multilevel modelling was used to calculate an overall effect size for each cognitive category. BDD and control groups differed significantly on measures of selective attention (g = 0.60, 95% CI = 0.26: 0.93), interpretive biases (g = 0.30, 95% CI = . 07: 0.54), and memory deficits (g=.56, 95% CI = 0.26: 0.87). Differences between the BDD and control groups on measures of local processing did not reach significance. These findings support the hypothesis that people with BDD may selectively attend to perceived threats or to disorder-related stimuli, misinterpret ambiguous stimuli as threatening, overvalue the importance of attractiveness, and have inaccurate coding and recall for facial or bodily stimuli. Recommendations for future research of these specific cognitive deficits in BDD include introducing the use of Modified Dot Probe Paradigms and new treatment targets that can be used as adjuncts to current treatment modalities.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A BDD-s betegeknél a lokális, részletekre irányuló és az egészleges, globális feldolgozás nem különbözik szignifikánsan a kontrollcsoporttól.
“a lokális, részletekre irányuló, valamint az egészleges, globális feldolgozás terén nem különbözik a két csoport szigni fi káns mértékben (Johnson, Williamson és Wade, 2018).”
From A testdiszmorfiás zavar pszichológiai vonatkozásai (2023) · cites this paper as Johnson, Williamson és Wade, 2018
Cites
Anxiety and cognitive performance: Attentional control theory
Eysenck, M. W., Derakshan, N., Santos, R., & Calvo, M. G. (2007) · Emotion · doi:10.1037/1528-3542.7.2.336 · Cited by 5,289 · see citing works
MacLeod, C., Rutherford, E., Campbell, L., Ebsworthy, G., & Holker, L. (2002) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-843x.111.1.107 · Cited by 1,334 · see citing works
Cognitive assessment of obsessive-compulsive disorder
(1997) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/s0005-7967(97)00017-x · Cited by 963 · see citing works
Direction and impact of language bias in meta-analyses of controlled trials: empirical study
Jüni, P., Holenstein, F., Sterne, J., Bartlett, C., & Egger, M. (2002) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/31.1.115 · Cited by 892 · see citing works
Moreno, S. G., Sutton, A. J., Ades, A., Stanley, T. D., Abrams, K. R., Peters, J. L., & Cooper, N. J. (2009) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/1471-2288-9-2 · Cited by 373 · see citing works
Emotion recognition deficits in body dysmorphic disorder
Buhlmann, U., McNally, R. J., Etcoff, N. L., Tuschen-Caffier, B., & Wilhelm, S. (2004) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/s0022-3956(03)00107-9 · Cited by 169 · see citing works
Moritz, S., Jelinek, L., Hauschildt, M., & Naber, D. (2010) · Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience · doi:10.31887/dcns.2010.12.2/smoritz · Cited by 113 · see citing works
Executive function in body dysmorphic disorder
Dunai, J., Labuschagne, I., Castle, D. J., Kyrios, M., & Rossell, S. L. (2010) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s003329170999198x · Cited by 89 · see citing works
Rabiei, M., Mulkens, S., Kalantari, M., Molavi, H., & Bahrami, F. (2012) · Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.jbtep.2011.09.013 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A testdiszmorfiás zavar pszichológiai vonatkozásai
Szászi, B., & Szabó, P. (2023) · Magyar Pszichologiai Szemle · doi:10.1556/0016.2023.00042 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Johnson, S., Williamson, P., & Wade, T. D.
- Affiliations
- Flinders University (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Johnson, Shevaugn
- Venue
- Behaviour Research and Therapy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-08
- Volume
- 107
- Pages
- 83-94
- ISSN
- 0005-7967 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2806530359
- Cited by
- 42
- References
- 9
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3
- FWCI
- 0.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-nd
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
- Locations
- Behaviour Research and Therapy (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Flinders Academic Commons (Flinders University) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Flinders Academic Commons (Flinders University) (acceptedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
- Keywords
- body dysmorphic disorder, cognitive processing deficits, selective attention, interpretation bias, memory impairment, local processing, facial attractiveness, threat perception, dot-probe task, treatment goals
- MeSH terms
- Attentional Bias, Attention, Cognition, Humans, Memory, Neuropsychological Tests, Body Dysmorphic Disorders
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review