The DOI matches its Crossref record; 135 of the 140 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Growth and structure of authorship and co-authorship network in the strategic management realm: Evidence from the Strategic Management Journal
Open accessAbstract
The main objective of this study is to investigate the intellectual structure and evolution of author collaborations from articles published in the Strategic Management Journal between 1980 and 2014. This assessment includes the general view of authorship, authorship patterns, author productivity, ranking of authors, visualization of the co-authorship network, comparison of strategic management co-authorship network attributes with those of other disciplines, the evolution of main components and core authors in the networks by period, discussions on whether the strategic management network fits with the small world network theory, individual network attributes such as degree centrality, Bonacich's power index, closeness centrality, and betweenness centrality. Finally, the authors provide an inclusive evaluation of the results, limitations, and suggestions for future research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Similarly, the use of bibliometric reviews ensures objectivity and offers unique insights into the literature (Koseoglu, 2016).”
From Blockchain technology in the smart city: A bibliometric review (2022) · cites this paper as Koseoglu, 2016
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
1 retracted
RETRACTED: Social networks of author–coauthor relationships
Said, Y. H., Wegman, E. J., Sharabati, W. K., & Rigsby, J. T. (2007) · Computational Statistics & Data Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.csda.2007.07.021 · Cited by 50
RetractedCollective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks
Watts, D. J., & Strogatz, S. H. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/30918 · Cited by 43,060
Emergence of Scaling in Random Networks
Barabási, A.-L., & Albert, R. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.286.5439.509 · Cited by 36,135
Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition
Lazega, E., & Burt, R. S. (1995) · Revue Française de Sociologie · doi:10.2307/3322456 · Cited by 7,983
Bibliometric Methods in Management and Organization
Zupic, I., & Čater, T. (2015) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/1094428114562629 · Cited by 7,495
Power and Centrality: A Family of Measures
Bonacich, P. (1987) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/228631 · Cited by 5,261
The structure of scientific collaboration networks
Newman, M. E. J. (2001) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.98.2.404 · Cited by 4,550
Social capital a theory of social structure and action
Lin, N. (2001) · Cited by 4,456
Science mapping software tools: Review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools
Cobo, M. J., López-Herrera, A. G., Herrera‐Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2011) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.21525 · Cited by 3,740
Factoring and weighting approaches to status scores and clique identification
Bonacich, P. (1972) · Journal of Mathematical Sociology · doi:10.1080/0022250x.1972.9989806 · Cited by 3,246
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Amsaveni, 2013, Authorship pattern and collaborative research in bioinformatics, Int. J. Comput. Sci. Mobile Comput., 2, 230
- Fleming, 2004, Perfecting cross-pollination, Harv. Bus. Rev., 83, 22
- Maheswaran, 2008, Research publications in structural engineering based on Journal of structural engineering, Ann. Libr. Inf. Stud., 55, 17
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Forty-five years of Journal of Business Research: A bibliometric analysis
Donthu, N., Kumar, S., & Pattnaik, D. (2019) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.10.039 · Cited by 1,046
Bibliometric studies in tourism
Köseoğlu, M. A., Rahimi, R., Okumuş, F., & Liu, J. (2016) · Annals of Tourism Research · doi:10.1016/j.annals.2016.10.006 · Cited by 644
Risk management in SMEs: A systematic literature review and future directions
Lima, P. F. D. A., Crema, M., & Verbano, C. (2019) · European Management Journal · doi:10.1016/j.emj.2019.06.005 · Cited by 281
Mostaghel, R., Oghazi, P., Parida, V., & Sohrabpour, V. (2022) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.03.072 · Cited by 193
Sustainable land use and management research: a scientometric review
Xie, H., Zhang, Y., Zeng, X., & He, Y. (2020) · Landscape Ecology · doi:10.1007/s10980-020-01002-y · Cited by 161
Metadata
- Authors
- Koseoglu, M. A.
- Venue
- BRQ Business Research Quarterly
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-07
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 153-170
- ISSN
- 2340-9436 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2309393944
- Cited by
- 242
- References
- 140
- Citations by year
- 2026: 23 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 4
- FWCI
- 11.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- BRQ Business Research Quarterly (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- AYBU AVESIS (submittedVersion)
- Econstor (Econstor) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychology Research and Bibliometrics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Complex Network Analysis Techniques
- Keywords
- co-authorship networks, authorship patterns, author productivity, author ranking, core authors, small-world networks, network centrality, Strategic Management Journal, intellectual structure, strategic management research
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
