Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 256

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 74 of the 74 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Deep Brain Stimulation for Tourette-Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Open access
Baldermann, Juan Carlos, Schüller, Thomas, Huys, Daniel, Becker, Ingrid, Timmermann, Lars, Jessen, Frank, Visser-Vandewalle, Veerle, Kuhn, Jens·2016·Brain Stimulation

Abstract

BACKGROUND A significant proportion of patients with Tourette syndrome (TS) continue to experience symptoms across adulthood that in severe cases fail to respond to standard therapies. For these cases, deep brain stimulation (DBS) is emerging as a promising treatment option. OBJECTIVE We conducted a systematic literature review to evaluate the efficacy of DBS for GTS. METHODS Individual data of case reports and series were pooled; the Yale Global Tic Severity Scale (YGTSS) was chosen as primary outcome parameter. RESULTS In total, 57 studies were eligible, including 156 cases. Overall, DBS resulted in a significant improvement of 52.68% (IQR = 40.74, p < 0.001) in the YGTSS. Analysis of controlled studies significantly favored stimulation versus off stimulation with a standardized mean difference of 0.96 (95% CI: 0.36-1.56). Disentangling different target points revealed significant YGTSS reductions after stimulation of the thalamus, the posteroventrolateral part and the anteromedial part of the globus pallidus internus, the anterior limb of the internal capsule and nucleus accumbens with no significant difference between these targets. A significant negative correlation of preoperative tic scores with the outcome of thalamic stimulation was found. CONCLUSIONS Despite small patient numbers, we conclude that DBS for GTS is a valid option for medically intractable patients. Different brain targets resulted in comparable improvement rates, indicating a modulation of a common network. Future studies might focus on a better characterization of the clinical effects of distinct regions, rather than searching for a unique target.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.brs.2015.11.005

Cites

74 of 74 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 74 references

Cited by

See all 256

Metadata

Authors
Baldermann, J. C., Schüller, T., Huys, D., Becker, I., Timmermann, L., Jessen, F., Visser-Vandewalle, V., & Kuhn, J.
Venue
Brain Stimulation
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-03
Volume
9
Issue
2
Pages
296-304
ISSN
  • 1876-4754 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-861X
OpenAlex
W2203330065
Cited by
256
References
74
FWCI
1.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Deep Brain Stimulation for Tourette-Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.brs.2015.11.005
The paper
Baldermann, J. C., Schüller, T., Huys, D., Becker, I., Timmermann, L., Jessen, F., Visser-Vandewalle, V., & Kuhn, J. (2016). Deep Brain Stimulation for Tourette-Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Brain Stimulation. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2015.11.005

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.