Cited by 69Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation StudiesSchizophrenia research and treatmentElectroconvulsive Therapy Studies

Stimulating cognition in schizophrenia: A controlled pilot study of the effects of prefrontal transcranial direct current stimulation upon memory and learning

Open access
Orlov, Natasza D., Tracy, Derek K., Joyce, Daniel, Patel, Shinal, Rodzinka-Pasko, Joanna, Dolan, Hayley, Hodsoll, John, Collier, Tracy +2 more·2017·Brain Stimulation

Abstract

Background Schizophrenia is characterized by prominent cognitive deficits, impacting on memory and learning; these are strongly associated with the prefrontal cortex. Objective/hypothesis To combine two interventions, transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the prefrontal cortex and cognitive training, to examine change in cognitive performance in patients with schizophrenia. Methods A double blind, sham-controlled pilot study of 49 patients with schizophrenia, randomized into real or sham tDCS stimulation groups. Subjects participated in 4 days of cognitive training (days 1, 2, 14, 56) with tDCS applied at day-1 and day-14. The primary outcome measure was change in accuracy on working memory and implicit learning tasks from baseline. The secondary outcome measure was the generalization of learning to non-trained task, indexed by the CogState neuropsychological battery. Data analysis was conducted using multilevel modelling and multiple regressions. Results 24 participants were randomized to real tDCS and 25 to sham. The working memory task demonstrated a significant mean difference in performance in the tDCS treatment group: at day-2 (b = 0.68, CI 0.14-1.21; p = 0.044) and at day-56 (b = 0.71, 0.16-1.26; p = 0.044). There were no significant effects of tDCS on implicit learning. Trend evidence of generalization onto untrained tasks of attention and vigilance task (b = 0.40, 0.43-0.77; p = 0.058) was found. Conclusions This is the first study to show a significant longer-term effect of tDCS on working memory in schizophrenia. Given the current lack of effective therapies for cognitive deficits, tDCS may offer an important novel approach to modulating brain networks to ameliorate cognitive deficits in schizophrenia.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.brs.2016.12.013

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. [1]Heinrichs, R.W. and K.K. Zakzanis, Neurocognitive deficit in schizophrenia: a quantitative review of the evidence. Neuropsychology, 1998. 12 (3): p. 426.
  2. [2]Silver, H., et al., Working memory deficit as a core neuropsychological dysfunction in schizophrenia. American Journal of Psychiatry, 2003. 160 (10): p. 1809-1816.
  3. [5]Green, M.F., et al., Approaching a consensus cognitive battery for clinical trials in schizophrenia: the NIMH-MATRICS conference to select cognitive domains and test criteria. Biol Psychiatry, 2004. 56 (5): p. 301-7.
  4. [12]Gaser, C., et al., Ventricular enlargement in schizophrenia related to volume reduction of the thalamus, striatum, and superior temporal cortex. American Journal of Psychiatry, 2004. 161 (1): p. 154-156.
  5. [17]Rowe, A.R., et al., Dementia praecox redux: A systematic review of the nicotinic receptor as a target for cognitive symptoms of schizophrenia. J Psychopharmacol, 2015. 29 (2).
  6. [20]Boggio, P.S., et al., Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on working memory in patients with Parkinson's disease. Journal of the neurological sciences, 2006. 249 (1): p. 31-38.
  7. [25]Keeser, D., et al., Prefrontal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Changes Connectivity of Resting-State Networks during fMRI. Journal of Neuroscience, 2011. 31 (43): p. 15284-15293.
  8. [26]Stagg, C.J., et al., Widespread modulation of cerebral perfusion induced during and after transcranial direct current stimulation applied to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. The Journal of Neuroscience, 2013. 33 (28): p. 11425-11431.
  9. [32]Mondino, M., et al., Can transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) alleviate symptoms and improve cognition in psychiatric disorders? The World Journal of Biological Psychiatry, 2014. 15 (4): p. 261-275.
  10. [35]Reinhart, R.M., et al., Medial-frontal stimulation enhances learning in schizophrenia by restoring prediction error signaling. The Journal of Neuroscience, 2015. 35 (35): p. 1223212240.
  11. [36]Reinhart, R.M., et al., Synchronizing theta oscillations with direct-current stimulation strengthens adaptive control in the human brain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2015. 112 (30): p. 9448-9453.
  12. [37]Nitsche, M., et al., Pharmacological modulation of cortical excitability shifts induced by transcranial direct current stimulation in humans. The Journal of physiology, 2003. 553 (1): p. 293-301.
  13. [39]Champod, A.S. and M. Petrides, Dissociable roles of the posterior parietal and the prefrontal cortex in manipulation and monitoring processes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2007. 104 (37): p. 14837-14842.
  14. [44]American Psychiatric Association, Diagnostic And Statistical Manual Of Mental Disorders DSMIV-TR Fourth Edition (Text Revision) Author: American Psychiatr. 2000.
  15. [46]Haatveit, B.C., et al., The validity of d prime as a working memory index: Results from the 'Bergen n-back task'. Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology, 2010. 32 (8): p. 871-880.
  16. [50]Attwell, D. and S.B. Laughlin, An energy budget for signaling in the grey matter of the brain. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism, 2001. 21 (10): p. 1133-1145.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Orlov, N. D., Tracy, D. K., Joyce, D., Patel, S., Rodzinka-Pasko, J., Dolan, H., Hodsoll, J., Collier, T., Rothwell, J., & Shergill, S. S.
Affiliations
  • King's College London (GB)
  • National Health Service (GB)
  • UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology (GB)
Corresponding author
Orlov, Natasza D.
Venue
Brain Stimulation
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-05
Volume
10
Issue
3
Pages
560-566
ISSN
  • 1876-4754 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-861X
OpenAlex
W2562496993
Cited by
69
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 5
FWCI
3.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Brain stimulation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies
Keywords
schizophrenia, transcranial direct current stimulation, prefrontal cortex, cognitive training, working memory, implicit learning, cognitive impairment, attention and vigilance, neuromodulation
MeSH terms
Adult, Attention, Cognition, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Male, Memory, Short-Term, Pilot Projects, Schizophrenia, Prefrontal Cortex, Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review